Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the strength of attachment of plant seedling roots to the soil in which they were grown. The study also assessed the effects of differing soil textures and differing soil matric potentials upon the strength of the root:soil attachment. A device for growing roots upon a soil surface was designed, and was used to produce roots which were attached to the soil. In order to quantify root:soil adhesion, roots of maize seedlings, grown on the soil surface, were subsequently peeled off using a universal test machine, in conjunction with simultaneous time-lapse video observation. To clarify the partitioning of energy in the root:soil peeling test, separate mechanical tests on roots, and on two adherent remoulded topsoil balls were also carried out. The seedling root was characterised by a low bending stiffness. The energy stored in bending was negligible, compared to the root:soil adhesion energy. The mechanical properties of two adherent remoulded topsoil balls were a decrease of the soil:soil adhesion energy as the soil:soil plastic energy increased. These two parameters were therefore interdependent. Using a video-camera system, it was possible to separate the different processes occurring during the root:soil peeling test, in particular, the seed:soil adhesion and the root:soil soil adhesion. An interpretation of the complex and variable force:displacement curves was thus possible, enabling calculation of the root:soil interfacial rupture energy. At a given suction (10 kPa), the results of the peeling test showed a clear soil texture effect on the value of the root:soil interfacial rupture energy. In contrast, for the same silty topsoil, the effect of the soil water suction on the value of the interfacial rupture energy was very moderate. The root:soil interfacial rupture energy was controlled mainly by a product of microscopic soil specific surface area and the macroscopic contact surface area between the root and the soil. Biological and physical interactions contributing to root:soil adhesion such as root:soil interlocking mechanics were also analysed and discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attou F 1996Etude expérimentale d'assemblages squelette-argile. Apport à la compréhension du comportement physique des sols. Orléans University, Ph.D. thesis.
Barley K P 1970The configuration of the root system in relation to nutrient uptake. Adv. Agronomy 22, 159–201.
Beck D L, Darrah L L and Zuber M S 1988Relationship of root tensile strength to vertical root pulling resistance in maize. Crop Sci. 28, 571–573.
Bengough A G, Croser C and Pritchard J 1997A biophysical analysis of root growth under mechanical stress. Plant Soil 189, 155–164.
Cormack R G H 1949The development of root hairs in Angiosperms. The Botanical Review XV, 583–611.
Czarnes S, Dexter A R and Bartoli F 1999Mechanics of two adherent centimetric remoulded soil balls: a preliminary examination. Soil Till. Res. 1414, 1–13.
Dexter A R 1978A stochastic model for the growth of roots in tilled soil. J. Soil Sci. 29, 102–116.
Dexter A R and Hewitt J S 1978The deflection of plant roots. J. Agric. Engng Res. 23, 17–22.
Dexter A R, Kroesbergen B and Kuipers H 1984a Some mechanical properties of aggregates of top soils from the IJsselmeer polders. 1. Undisturbed soil aggregates. Neth. J. Agri. Sci. 32, 205–214.
Dexter A R, Kroesbergen B and Kuipers H 1984b Some mechanical properties of aggregates of top soils from the IJsselmeer polders. 2. Remoulded soil aggregates and the effects of wetting and drying cycles. Neth. J. Agri. Sci. 32, 215–227.
Ennos A R 1989The mechanics of anchorage in seedlings of sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. New Phytol. 113, 185–192.
Ennos A R 1990The anchorage of leek seedlings: The effect of root length and soil strength. Ann. Bot. 65, 409–416.
Ennos A R 1993The anchorage mechanics of Maize, Zea mays. J. Exp. Bot. 4, 147–153.
Ewens M and Leigh R A 1985The effect of nutrient solution composition on the length of root hairs of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Exp. Bot. 36, 713–724.
Fincher R R, Darrah L L and Zuber M S 1985Root development in maize as measured by vertical pulling resistance. Maydica 30, 383–394.
Fuller K N G and Tabor D 1975The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 345, 327–342.
Gijsman A J, Flopris J, Van Noordwijk M and Brouwer G 1991 An inflatable minirhizotron system for root observations with improved soil/tube contact. Plant Soil 134, 261–269.
Greacen E L, Farrell D A and Cockroft B 1968Soil resistance to metal probes and plant roots. Transactions of the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, Adelaide, Australia, volume I, 769–779.
Gregg S J and Singh K S W 1967Adsoption, surface area and porosity. Academic Press, London.
Jaunin F and Hofer R M 1986Root hair formation and elongation of primary maize root. Physiol. Plant. 68, 653–656.
Klute A 1986Water retention: laboratory methods. In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Agronomy Monograph no 9, pp. 635–662.
Kooistra M J, Schoonderbeek D, Boone F R, Veen B W and Van Noordwijk M 1992Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. II. Effects of soil compaction. Plant Soil 139, 119–129.
Mackay A D and Barber S A 1987Effect of wetting and drying of a soil on root hair growth of maize roots. Plant Soil 104, 291–293.
Meisner C A and Karnok K J 1991Root hair occurrence and variation with environment. Agron. J. 83, 814–818.
Misra R K, Alston A M and Dexter A R 1988Role of root hairs in phosphorus depletion from a macrostructured soil. Plant Soil 107, 11–18.
Mitchell J K 1993Fundamentals of soil behavior, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Niklas K J 1992Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Petersen L W, Moldrup P, Jacobsen O H and Rolston D E 1996 Relations between specific surface area and soil physical and chemical properties. Soil Sci. 161: 9–21.
Reid C P P and Bowen G D 1979Effect of soil moisture on V/A mycorrhiza formation and root development in Medicago. In The soil-root interface. Ed. J L Harley. New Phytol. 211–220.
Schultz J and Carre A 1985Prévision de l'adhésion d'aluminium traité à l'aide de méthodes de mouillabilité. Surfaces 178, 30–36.
Smith C W, Hadas A, Dan J and Koyumdjisky H 1985Shrinkage and Atterberg limits in relation to other properties of principal soil types in Israel. Geoderma 35, 47–65.
Stokes R J and Evans D F 1997Fundamentals of Interfacial Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Van Damme H 1995Scale invariance and hydric behaviour of soils and clays. Comptes Rendus à l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 320, Series II a, 665–681.
Van Noordwijk M, Kooistra M J, Boone F R, Veen B W and Schoonderbeek D 1992Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. I. Validity of the method. Plant Soil 139, 109–118.
Veen B W, Van Noordwijk M, De Willigen P, Boone F R and Kooistra M J 1992Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. III. Effects on shoot growth, nitrate and water uptake efficiency. Plant Soil 139, 131–138.
Vincent J F V 1992Biomechanics – materials: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Czarnes, S., Hiller, S., Dexter, A.R. et al. Root:soil adhesion in the maize rhizosphere: the rheological approach. Plant and Soil 211, 69–86 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004656510344
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004656510344