Skip to main content
Log in

Event History Data and Making a History out of Cross-Sectional Data

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the turn of 20th century social scientists have built up a large stock of cross-sectional data-sets to study social change. However, scholars more and more collect event history data containing the exact timing of events. Comparing the (dis)advantages event history data are to be preferred. However, for research on value change the event history approach is inapplicable, since it is not possible to ask the timing of a value change retrospectively. I will illustrate that value change (i.e. cohort differences) can be studied adequately with cross-sectional data, if information about the historical context is added. For this purpose I test Inglehart's value change thesis.

Interestingly, there are also topics in which cross-sectional data-sets are unnecessarily being used. Using research on secularization as an example, I show that the event-history approach can be used to answer the question whether the decreasing number of religious people concerns a cohort-effect. However, whatever data-set is being used, to study cohort differences, one should always give a theoretical answer to the key-question: what exactly makes cohorts different

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. et al. (1979). Political Action. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. W. & Vink, R. (1994). Secularisatie in Nederland; 1966–1991. (Secularization in the Netherlands, 66–1991). Rijswijk: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H. P. (1986). Career opportunities in the Federal Republic of Germany: a dynamic approach to the study of life-course, cohort, and period effects. European Sociological Review 2: 208–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P., Hamerle, A. & Mayer, K. U. (1986). Ereignisanalyse: Statistische Theorie und Anwendung in den Wirtschaft-und Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. & Rohwer, G. (1995). Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Mahwah, NJ, U.S.A., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, L. H. & Iversen, G. R. (1979). Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, M. & Scheepers, P. (1998). Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979–1993: effects of period, cohort, and individual characteristics. European Sociological Review (forthcoming).

  • De Graaf, N. D. (1988). Postmaterialism and the Stratification Process: An International Comparison. Utrecht: ISOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf, N. D. & Evans, G. (1996). Why are the young more postmaterialist? A cross-national analysis of individual and contextual influence on postmaterial values. Comparative Political Studies 28: 608–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf, N. D., Hagenaars, J. & Luijkx, R. (1989). Intragenerational stability of postmaterialism in the United States,West Germany and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 5: 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorn, P. & Bommeljé, Y. (1983). Maar...men moet toch iets wezen: Nieuwe gegevens over ontkerkelijking in Nederland. Utrecht: Humanistisch Verbond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1960). Le Suicide, etude de sociologie. Paris: Press Universitaires de France (new edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, P. & Alber, J. (1984). Modernization, democratization, and the development of welfare states in Western Europe. In: P. Flora & J. Arnold Heidenheimer (eds), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, pp. 37–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felling, A., Peters, J. & Schreuder, O. (1986). Geloven en Leven: Een nationaal onderzoek naar de invloed van religieuze overtuigingen. Zeist: Kerckebosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N. D. (1977). Cohort Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R. M. (1970). Context and consex: a cautionary tale. American Journal of Sociology 75: 645–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halman, L., Heunks, F., Moor, R. de & Zanders, H. (1987). Traditie, secularisatie en individualisering: een studie naar de waarden van de Nederlanders in een Europese context. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1983). The persistence of materialist and post-materialist value orientations: comment on Van Deth's analysis. European Journal of Political Research 11: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1985a). Aggregate stability and individual level flux in mass belief systems: The level of analysis paradox. American Political Science Review 79: 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. and Rabier, J. (1986). Political re-alignment in advanced industrial society: from classbased politics to quality of life politics. Goverment and Opposition 21: 456–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. & De Graaf, N. D. (1997). National context, parental socialization, and religious belief: results from 15 nations. American Sociological Review 62: 639–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, 2nd edn, NY Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, A. (1964). Economic Growth in the West. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Need, A. (1997). The Kindred Vote: Individual and Family Effects of Social Class and Religion on Electoral Change in the Netherlands, 1956–1994 (dissertation). Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Need, A. & De Graaf, N. D. (1994). Losing my religion: een dynamische benadering, (Losing my religion: a dynamic approach). Mens en Maatschappij 69: 242–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Need, A. & De Graaf, N. D. (1996a). Losing my religion: a dynamic analysis of leaving the church in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 12: 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W. L. (1982). Estimable functions of age, period, and cohort effects. Am.Soc.Review 47: 774–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepens, T. (1991). Kerk in Nederland: Een landelijk onderzoek naar kerkbetrokkenheid en kerkverlating. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacchi, Stefan (1998). The dimensionality of postmaterialism: An application of factor analysis to ranked preference data. European Sociological Review 14: 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E. (1991). Leaving the faith: theories of religious switching using survival models. Social Science Research 20: 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Grotenhuis, M., De Graaf, N. D. & Peters, J. (1997). Does religiosity come with age? Effects of age, welfare, social security, and religious upbringing on church attendance and Christian belief in Western Europe. Mens en Maatschappij 72: 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, N. B. & Hannan, M. T. (1984). Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultee, W. C. & Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (1993). Netherlands Family Survey 1992–1993 [machine readable data set]). Nijmegen, Netherlands: Dept. of Sociology, Nijmegen University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. (1991). Event History Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Graaf, N. Event History Data and Making a History out of Cross-Sectional Data. Quality & Quantity 33, 261–276 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004635910768

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004635910768

Navigation