Skip to main content
Log in

The Contribution of Longitudinal Research to the Study of Women's Poverty

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss some of the central conceptual and methodological issues which must be tackled if we wish to investigate poverty in a gender-sensitive way. The relationship between women and poverty is complex and therefore very difficult to reveal: the disproportionate vulnerability of women arises from the interaction of economic disadvantages in the labour market, in domestic circumstances and in welfare systems.

The methodological challenge that emerges now is how can we reveal the gender dimension of poverty? Especially in the case of women, the life course perspective may offer a fruitful starting point: life course changes are more pronounced for women than for men both in the family and in the labour market. Thus, longitudinal data are required, since only they can efficiently estimate the parameters of dynamic processes in the social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, P. (1993). Understanding Poverty. Hampshire and London: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M. J. & Ellwood, D. T. (1986). Slipping into and out of poverty. The dynamics of spells. The Journal of Human Resources 21(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., Heady, C. & Millar, J. (1998). The transition to lone parenthood in the United Kingdom, Paper, University of Bath, March.

  • Becker, S. (1997). Responding to Poverty.The Politics of Cash and Care. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimbi, F. (1997). Lone mothers in Italy. A hidden and embarassing issue in a familist welfare regime. In: J. Lewis (ed.), Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes.Shifting Policy Logics. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhman, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G. & Smeeding, T. (1988). Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg income study (LIS) database. The Review of Income and Wealth 34(2): 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser, R. V., Smeeding, T. M. & Merz, J. (1994). Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the United States using alternative equivalence scales, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 117.

  • Charles, N. & Kerr, M. (1987). Just the way it is: Gender and age differences in family food consumption. In: J. Brannen & G. Wilson (eds), Give and Take in Families. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Coxall, J., Craig, G. & Sadiq-Sangster, A. (1992). Hardship Britain: Being Poor in the 1990s. London: Child Poverty Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. & Glendinning, C. (1990). Missing the Target. Ilford: Barnardos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1992). Europe's poor women? Gender in research on poverty. European Sociological Review 8(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleeck, H., Van den Bosch, K. & De Lathouwer, L. (eds) (1992). Poverty and the Adequacy of Social Security in the EC.A Comparative Analysis. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditch, J., Barnes, H., Bradshaw, J. & Kilkey, M. (1998). Synthesis of National Family Policies. EU Observatory on National Family Policies, University of York.

  • Duncan, S. & Edwards, R. (1997). Single mothers-mothers versus workers, or, mothers and workers? In: S. Duncan & R. Edwards (eds), Single Mothers in an International Context: Mothers or Workers? London: UCL Press, pp. 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erler, G. (1988). The German paradox. Non-feminization of the labour force and post-industrial social policies. In: J. Jenson, E. Hagen & C. Reddy (eds), Feminization of the Labour Force.Paradox and Promises. Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (1996). The European Community Household Panel (ECHP): Survey Methodology and Implementation. Volume 1, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, C. & Millar, J. (eds) (1992). Women and Poverty in Britain in the 1990s. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Graham, H. (1984). Women, Health and the Family. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. (1987). Women's poverty and caring. In: C. Glendinning & J. Millar (eds), Women and Poverty in Britain. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedman, B., Perucci, F. & Sundström, P. (1996). Engendering Statistics.A Tool for a Change. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, H. (1983). Poverty and gender: The distribution of resources within families. In: M. Brown (ed.), The Structure of Disadvantage. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. & Lansley, S. (1985). Poor Britain. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlier, E. (1999). The EC Household Panel Newsletter. Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, Theme 3, n. 2, Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., Sorensen, A. & Watson, D. (1989). Sex differences in poverty 1950–1980. Signs-Journal of Women in Culture and Society 15(1): 102–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, J. (1998). The 'big' picture: Quality in the lives of lone parents. In: J. Millar & R. Ford (eds), Private Lives and Public Responses.Lone Parenthood and Future Policy in the UK. London: Policy Studies Institute, pp. 78–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. (1989). Poverty and the Lone-Parent Family: The Challenge to Social Policy. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J. & Glendinning, C. (1988). Gender and poverty. Journal of Social Policy 18(3): 363–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingione, E. (1996). Urban poverty in the advanced industrial world: Concepts, analysis and debates. In: E. Mingione (ed.), Urban Poverty and the Underclass. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. (1997a). Donne e povertà. Percorsi e caratteristiche del disagio nelle società europee occidentali: il caso della Germania e della Gran Bretagna. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Italy, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. (1997b). Gender differences in poverty and its duration: An analysis of Germany and Great Britain. In: T. Dunn and J. Schwarze (eds), Proceedings of the 1996 Second International Conference of the German Socio-Economic Study Users. DIW-Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 1/97, Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt, pp. 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. (1997c). Gender and Dynamics of Poverty: The Cases of (West) Germany and Great Britain, Working Papers of the ESRC Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, Paper 97–24, Colchester: University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E. (1988). Living on the poverty line: Lone mothers in Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, MZES Working Paper, MZES: University of Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Living Standards. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., Dale, A. & Joshi, H. (1996). Income fependency within vouples. In: L. Morris & E. Stina Lyon (eds), Gender Relations in Public and Private, New Research Perspectives. London: MacMillan Press, pp. 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruspini, E. The Contribution of Longitudinal Research to the Study of Women's Poverty. Quality & Quantity 33, 323–338 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004605021961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004605021961

Navigation