Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling competition for water in intercrops: theory and comparison with field experiments

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A knowledge of plant interactions above and below ground with respect to water is essential to understand the performance of intercrop systems. In this study, a physically based framework is proposed to analyse the competition for soil water in the case of intercropped plants. A radiative transfer model, associated with a transpiration-partitioning model based on a modified form of the Penman-Monteith equation, was used to estimate the evaporative demand of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum ( Sorghum vulgare R.) intercrops. In order to model soil–root water transport, the root water potential of each species was calculated so as to minimise the difference between the evaporative demand and the amount of water taken up by each species. A characterisation of the micrometeorological conditions (net radiation, photosynthetically active radiation, air temperature and humidity, rain), plant water relations (leaf area index, leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, sap flow measurements), as well as the two-component root systems and water balance (soil–root impacts, soil evaporation) was carried out during a 7-day experiment with densities of about 4.2 plant m-2 for both maize and sorghum. Comparison of the measured and calculated transpiration values shows that the slopes of the measured versus predicted regression lines for hourly transpiration were 0.823 and 0.778 for maize and sorghum, respectively. Overall trends in the variation of volumetric water content profiles are also reasonably well described. This model could be useful for analysing competition where several root systems are present under various environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiku S G K, Carberry P S, Rose C W, Mccown R L and Braddock R 1995 A maize (Zea mays) — cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercrop model. In Ecophysiology of Tropical Intercropping. Eds. H Sinoquet and P Cruz. pp 396-406. INRA Science Update, INRA ed., Versailles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries F, Prévot L and Monestiez P 1993 Geometrical canopy modelling in radiation simulation studies. In Crop Structure and Light Microclimate. Eds. C Varlet-Grancher, R Bonhomme and H Sinoquet. pp 159-173. INRA Editions, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin J P, Tinker P B and Nye PH 1972 Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil. II. The theoretical effect of rooting density and pattern on uptake of nutrients from soil. Plant Soil 63, 693-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard Y 1974 Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum A and Sullivan C Y 1974 Leaf water potential and stomatal activity in sorghum as influenced by soil moisture stress. Isr. J. Bot. 23, 14-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boast C W and Robertson T M 1982 A micro-lysimeter method for determining evaporation from a bare soil: Description and laboratory evaluation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 689-696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer J S 1971 Resistances to water transport in soybean, bean and sunflower. Crop Sci. 3, 403-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckler L, Lafolie F and Tardieu F 1991 Modelling root water potential and soil-root water transport: II. Field comparisons. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1213-1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M M 1994 Exploiting nutrients in fertile soil microsites. In Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Ecophysiological processes above-and belowground. Eds. M M Caldwell and R W Pearcy. pp 325-347. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell R M 1995 Simulation models for intercropping systems. In Ecophysiology of Tropical Intercropping. Eds. H Sinoquet and P Cruz. pp 353-368. INRA Science Update, INRA ed., Versailles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell R M and Richards J H 1986 Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption. In On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Ed. T Givnish. pp 251-273. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell R M and Richards J H 1989 Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79, 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson D T 1991 Root structure and sites of ion uptake. In Plant Roots, the Hidden Half. Eds. Y Wasiel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 417-454. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausnitzer V and Hopmans J W 1994 Simultaneous modeling of transient three-dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant Soil 164, 299-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirksen C and Raats P A C 1985 Water uptake and release by alfalfa roots. Agron. J. 77, 621-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feddes R A Kowalik P J and Zaradny H 1978 Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Simulation monograph, Pudoc, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H 1991 Characteristics and functions of root systems. In Plant Roots, the Hidden Half. Eds. Y Wasiel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 3-24. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner W R 1960 Dynamics aspects of soil water availability to plants. Soil Sci. 89, 63-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P J and Reddy M S 1982 Root growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crop Res. 5, 241-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib R, Pagès L, Jordan M O, Simonneau T and Sébillotte M 1991 Approche à l'échelle du système racinaire de l'absorption hydrominérale. Conséquences en matière de modélisation. Agronomie 11, 623-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham J M, Heilman J L and Lascano R J 1990 Determination of soil water evaporation and transpiration from energy balance and stem flow measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol. 52, 287-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins R 1984 Intercropping maize with sorghum in Central America: a cropping system case study. Agric. Syst. 15, 79-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes R J 1980 Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Adv. Agron. 33, 227-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis P G 1976 The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 273, 593-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis P G 1979 Stomatal conductance, gaseous exchange and transpiration. In Plants and Their Atmospheric Environment, 21st Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc. Blackwell Scientific Publ. Eds. J Grave, E D Ford and P G Jarvis. Oxford, pp 175-204.

  • Katerji N, Hallaire M, Perrier A and Durand R 1983a Transfert hydrique dans le végétal. I. Modélisation à l'échelle du couvert végétal en conditions naturelles. Acta. Oecol Oecol. Plant. 4, 11-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Hallaire M, Menoux-Boyer Y and Perrier A 1983b Transfert hydrique dans le végétal. II. Détermination au champ des variations de contenu en eau du couvert végétal. Acta. Oecol Oecol. Plant. 4, 171-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry J R, Blanchet R, Gassman P W and Debaeke P 1992 A general, process-oriented model for two competing plant species. Trans. ASAE 35, 801-810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küppers M 1994 Canopy gaps: Competitive light interception and economic space filling — A matter of whole-plant allocation. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Ecophysiological Processes Above-and Belowground. Eds. R M Caldwell and R W Pearcy. pp 111-144. Academic Press, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafolie F, Bruckler L and Tardieu F 1991 Modeling root water potential and soil-root water transport: I Model presentation. Soil Sci. Am. J. 55, 1213-1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt D W 1963 An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non linear parameters. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 11, 431-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin M P L D and Snaydon R W 1982 Root and shoot interactions between barley and field beans when intercropped. J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 263-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith J L 1965 Evaporation and environment. In The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms. Ed. G E Fogg. pp 205-234. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 19, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith J L 1995 A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 357-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith J L and Unsworth M H 1990 Principles of environmental physics, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London, 291 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann H H, Thurtell G W and Stevenson K R 1973 In situ measurements of leaf water potential and resistance to water flow in corn, soybean, and sunflower at several transpiration rates. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54, 175-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • North G B and Nobel P S 1992 Drought-induced changes in hydraulic conductivity and structure in roots of Ferocactus ancanthodes and Opuntia fiscus-indica. New Phytol. 120, 9-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong C K, Corlett J E, Singh R P and Black C R 1991 Above and bellow ground interactions in agroforestry systems. For. Ecol. Manage. 45, 45-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozier-Lafontaine H, Vercambre G and Tournebize R 1997 Radiation and transpiration partitioning in a maize-sorghum intercrop: A comparison of two models. Field Crop Res. 49, 127-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky Y, Timlin Y D, Acock B, Lemon H and Trent A 1993 2D SOIL — A new modular simulator of soil and root processes. Release 02 (April 1993). USDA-ARS, Systems Research Laboratory, Beltsville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B 1988 Water transport in and to roots. Ann Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39, 245-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B 1991 Soil structure and plant growth. Aust. J. Soil Res. 29, 717-728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prévot L, Aries F and Monestiez P 1991 Modélisation de la structure géométrique du maïs. Agronomie 11, 491-503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakuratani T 1981 A heat balance method for measuring water flow in the stem of intact plant. Jap. Agric. Met. 37, 9-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth W J and Wallace J S 1985 Evaporation from sparse crops — an energy combination theory. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 111, 839-855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E D, Turner N C, Gollan T and Shackel K A 1987 Stomatal responses to air humidity and to soil drought. In Stomatal Function. Eds. E Zieger, I Cowan and G D Farquhar. pp 311-321. Standford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R P, Ong C K and Saharan N 1989 Above and bellow ground interactions in alley — cropping in semi-arid India. Agroforest. Syst. 9, 259-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinoquet H 1989 Modélisation de l'interception des rayonnements solaires dans une culture en rangs. I. Aspects théoriques. Agronomie 9, 125-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinoquet H and Bonhomme R 1989 Modélisation de l'interception des rayonnements solaires dans une culture en rangs. II. Structure géométrique du couvert et validation du modèle. Agronomie 9, 619-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinoquet H and Bonhomme R 1991 A theoretical analysis of radiation interception in a two-species plant canopy. Math. Biosci. 105, 23-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinoquet H and Bonhomme R 1992 Modelling radiative transfer in mixed and row intercropping systems. Agric. For. Meteorol. 62, 219-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinoquet H, Moulia B, Gastal F and Bonhomme R 1990 Modeling the radiative balance of the components of a well-mixed canopy: application to a white clover-tall fescue mixture. Acta Oecol Oecol. 11, 469-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaydon R W and Harris P M 1981 Interaction below ground — the use of nutrients and water. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Intercropping. pp 188-201. Hyberabad.

  • Tamari S, Bruckler L, Halbertsma J and Chadoeuf J 1993 A simple method for determining soil hydraulic properties in the laboratory. Soil Sci. Am. J. 57, 642-651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F 1988a Analysis of spatial variability of maize root density. I. Effect of wheel compaction on the spatial arrangement of roots. Plant Soil 107, 259-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F 1988b Analysis of spatial variability of maize root density. II. Distances between roots. Plant Soil 107, 267-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F 1988c Analysis of spatial variability of maize root density. III. Effect of wheel compaction on water extraction. Plant Soil 109, 257-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F, Bruckler L and Lafolie F 1992 Root clumping may affect the root water potential and the resistance to soil-root water transport. Plant Soil 140, 291-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tournebize R and Sinoquet H 1995 Light interception and partitioning in a shrub/grass mixture. Agric. For. Meteorol. 72, 277-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tournebize R, Sinoquet H and Bussière F 1996 Modelling evapotranspiration partitioning in a shrub/grass alley crop. Agric. For. Meteorol. 81, 255-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C 1991 Measurement and influence of environmental and plant factors on stomatal conductance in the field. Agric. For. Meteorol. 54, 137-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C and Begg J E 1973 Stomatal behavior and water status of maize, sorghum, and tobacco under field conditions. I. At high soil water potential. Plant Physiol. 51, 31-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel M G and Van Bavel C H M 1990 'Dynagage'. Installation and Operation Manual — Dynamax Inc. 80 p.

  • Van Genuchten M T 1980 A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Am. J. 44, 892-898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace J S 1995 Towards a coupled light partitioning and transpiration model for use in intercrops and agroforestry. In Ecophysiology of Tropical Intercropping. Eds. H Sinoquet and P Cruz. pp 153-162. INRA Science Update, INRA ed., Versailles.

  • Wallace J S, Batchelor C H, Dabeesing D N and Sopramanien G C 1991 A comparison of the light interception and the water use of plant and first ratoon sugar cane intercropped with maize. Agric. For. Meteorol. 51, 35-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendroth O, Ehlers W, Hopmans J W, Kage H, Halbertsma J and Wösten J H M 1993 Reevaluation of the evaporation method for determining hydraulic functions in unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 1436-1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind G P 1969 Capillary conductivity data estimated by a simple method. In Water in the Unsaturated Zone. Vol. 1. Eds. P E Rijtema and H Wassink. pp 181-191. Proceedings of the Wageningen symposium, June 1966. IASH Gentbrugge / UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA, Unité Agropédoclimatologique de la Zone Caraïbe, Domaine Duclos, BP 515, Petit-Bourg, 97165, Pointe-à-Pitre Cedex, Guadeloupe

    H. Ozier-Lafontaine

  2. INRA, Unité de Science du sol, Domaine St Paul, Site Agroparc, 84914, Avignon Cedex 9, France

    F. Lafolie, L. Bruckler, R. Tournebize & A. Mollier

Authors
  1. H. Ozier-Lafontaine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Lafolie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Bruckler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Tournebize
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Mollier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozier-Lafontaine, H., Lafolie, F., Bruckler, L. et al. Modelling competition for water in intercrops: theory and comparison with field experiments. Plant and Soil 204, 183–201 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004399508452

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004399508452

Search

Navigation