Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Using Latent and Manifest Variables

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative virtues of quantitative and qualitative research have been vigorously debated. Several researchers recommend combining methodologies but there is little evidence in the literature to suggest how different research methods might be integrated (Bryman, 1988). The current study addresses this deficiency in the research by examining the use of latent variables in quantitative and qualitative research as a means of blending the two approaches. A study of entrepreneurial Locus of Control where quantitative and qualitative data were available illustrates the methodological issues. Analysis of quantitative data was conducted using LISREL (7.20) and qualitative data were categorised using NUD.IST (Non-numerical Unstructured Data Indexing Searching and Theorising computer software). Detailed comparisons are made between the methods described in this paper and other approaches to content analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashkanasy, N.M. (1985). Rotter's Internal-External scale: Confirmatory factor analysis and correlation with social desirability for alternative scale formats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(5): 1328–1341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. and Chou, C.P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research 16(1): August, 78–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B.L. (1995). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (2nd edn). Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G. (1993). Testing the relationship of locus of control to different performance dimensions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 66: 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R.H. (1982). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In: C. Kent, D. Sexton and K. Vesper, (eds). Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. New York: Prentice-Hall, pp. 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., Stephens, M. and Campo, C. (1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly 7(3): 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.C. and Meindl, J.R. (1991). The construction of leadership images in the popular press: The case of Donald Burr and People Express. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(4), 521–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. (1974). Four components of the Rotter Internal-External Scale: Belief in a difficult world, a just world, a predictable world, and a politically responsive world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29: 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15: 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1978). The Research Act. (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N.G. and Fielding, J.L. (1987). Linking Data. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filstead, W.J. (1979). Qualitative methods: A needed perspective in evaluation research. In: T.D. Cook and C.S. Reichardt (eds). Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L.D. and Goodwin, W.L. (1985). Statistical techniques in AERJ articles, 1979–1983: The preparation of graduate students to read the educational research literature. Educational Researcher 14(2): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal 30(4): 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, P., Gurin, G. and Morrison, B. (1978). Personal and ideological aspects of internal and external control. Social Psychology 41: 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.R., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (4th edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insch, G.S., Moore, J.E., and Murphy, L.D. (1997). Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use. Leadership Quarterly 8(1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. National Educational Resources, Chicago, Ill.: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago, Ill.: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinicki, A.J. and Vecchio, R.P. (1994). Influences on the quality of supervisor-subordinate relations: The role of time-pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, J.A. (1971). Internal-external locus of control and ego functioning correlates in the elderly. Gerontologist 12: 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H.M. (ed.). (1981). Research with Locus of Control Construct: Assessment and Methods, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality Assessment 38: 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H. (1981). Internality, powerful others and chance. In H.M. Lefcourt (ed.), Research with Locus of Control Construct: Assessment and Methods, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. and Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin 97: 562–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J.R., Ehrlich, S.B., and Dukerich, J.M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 78–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, M.A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Kets de Vries, M.F. and Toulouse, J. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure and environment. Academy of Management Journal 25(2): 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T.R., Smyser, C.M., and Weed, S.E. (1975). Locus of control: Supervision and work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal 18: 623–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D.W. and Greene, C.N. (1974). Role ambiguity, locus of control and work satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 59: 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere specific measures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 1253–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. (1993). 2b or not 2b? British Academy of Management Newsletter (June), p. 7.

  • Phares, E.J. (1976). Locus of Control in Personality. New Jersey: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualitative Solutions and Research (1996). User's Guide for Q.S.R. NUD.IST. Melbourne: Latrobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. and Richards, T. (1994). From filing cabinet to computer. In: A. Bryman and R. Burgess (eds), Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalised expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph 80,609, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P.E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin 91(3): 482–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P.E. (1988). Development of the Work Locus of Control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology 61: 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R. (1992). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Hampshire: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.P. (1985). Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Judy H. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iain L. Densten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, J.H., Densten, I.L. Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Using Latent and Manifest Variables. Quality & Quantity 32, 419–431 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004357719066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004357719066

Keywords

Search

Navigation