Abstract
Methane production rates were determined at weekly intervals during anaerobic incubation of eleven Philippine rice soils. The average production rates at 25 °C varied in a large range from 0.03 to 13.6 μg CH4 g(d.w. soil) -1d-1. The development of methane production rates derived from inherent substrate allowed a grouping of soils in three classes: those with instantaneous development, those with a delay of approximately two weeks, and those with a suppression of methane production of more than eight weeks. Incubation at 30 and 35 °C increased production capacities of all soils, but the grouping of soils was still maintained. The Arrhenius equation provided a good fit for temperature effects on methane production capacities except for those soils with suppressed production. Acetate amendment strongly enhanced methane production rates and disintegrated the grouping. However, the efficiencies in converting acetate to methane differed among soils. Depending on the soil, 16.5–66.7% of the added acetate was utilized within five weeks incubation at 25 °C.
Correlation analyses of methane production (over eight weeks) and physico-chemical soil parameters yielded significant correlations for the concentrations of organic carbon (R2 = 0.42) and organic nitrogen (R2 = 0.52). Correlation indices could substantially be enhanced by using the enriched fraction of organic carbon (R2 = 0.94) and organic nitrogen (R2 = 0.77), i.e. the differential between topsoil and subsoil concentrations of the respective compounds. The enriched organic material in the topsoil corresponds to the biologically active fraction and thus represents a good indicator of methane production derived from inherent substrate. The best indicators of the conversion rate of acetate in different soils were pH-value (R2 = 0.56) and organic carbon content (R2 = 0.52).
Apparently, soil properties affect methane production through various pathways. Inherent organic substrate represents a considerable source of methane in some soils and is negligible in others. Likewise, soils also differ regarding the response to exogenous substrate. Both mechanisms yield in a distinct spatial variability of methane production in rice soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cicerone R J and Oremland R S 1988 Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2, 299–327.
Conrad R and Rothfuss F 1991 Methane oxidation in the soil surface layer of a flooded rice field and the effect of ammonium. Biol. Fertil. Soils 12, 28–32.
Conrad R, Schütz H and Babbel M 1987 Temperature limitation of hydrogen turnover and methanogenesis in anoxic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45, 281–289.
Denier van der Gon H A C, Neue H U, Lantin R S, Wassmann R, Alberto M C R, Aduna J B and Tan M J 1992 Controlling factors of methane emission from ricefields. In World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials. Eds. N H Batjes and E M Bridges. pp 81–92. WISE Rep. 2, ISRIC, Wageningen.
Denier van der Gon H 1996 Methane emission from wetland rice fields. Ph.D. Thesis, Agric. Univ. Wageningen, The Netherlands. 182 p.
Gaunt J L, Neue H U, Bragais J, Grant I F and Giller K E 1997 Soil characteristics which regulate soil reduction and methane production in wetland rice soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (In press).
GEIA — Global Emission Inventory Activity 1993 Report on the 3rd workshop (Amersford 31 Jan–02 Feb. 1993). Ed. A F Bowman (RIVM-Rep. 481507002, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R and Seiler W 1985 Production, oxidation and emission of methane from rice paddies. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 31, 343–351.
IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1990 Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press. XXXIX + 358 p.
IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1992 Climate Change. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press. XII + 200 p.
Joulian C, Ollivier B, Neue H U and Roger P A 1996 Microbiological aspects of methane emission by a ricefield soil from the Camargue (France): 1. Methanogenesis and related microflora. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 32(2), 61–70.
Lin M and You C 1989 Root exudates of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their interaction with Alcaligenes faecalis. Sci. Agric. Sin. 22, 6–12.
Mayer H P and Conrad R 1990 Factors influencing the population of methanogenic bacteria and the initiation of methane production upon flooding of paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 73, 103–112.
Neue H U 1988 A holistic view of chemistry of flooded soils. In IBSRAM — International Board of Soil Research Management. Soil Management for Sustainable Rice Production in the Tropics. pp 3–32. Monogr. No. 2, Bangkok, Thailand.
Neue H U 1993 Methane emission from rice fields. Bioscience 43, 466–474.
Neue H U and Roger P A 1993 Rice agriculture: Factors controlling emissions. In Global Atmospheric Methane. Ed. M A K Khalil and M Shearer. pp. 254–298. NATO ASI/ARW series.
Neue H U, Lantin R L, Wassmann R, Aduna J B, Alberto M C R and Andales M J 1994 Methane emissions from rice soils of the Philippines. In CH4 and N2O: Global Emissions and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial Sources. Ed. K Minami, A Mosier and R Sass. pp 55–63. NIAES Series 2, Tsukuba, Japan.
Oades J M 1988 The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5, 35–70.
Ponnamperuma F N 1972 The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv. Agron. 24, 29–96.
Raymundo M E, Mamaril C P and De Datta S K 1989 Environment, classification, and agronomic potentials of some wetland soils in the Philippines, Los Ba nos, Philippines (PCARRD and IRRI book series No. 85/1989). 174 p.
Sass R L, Fisher F M, Lewis S T, Jund M F and Turner F T 1991 Methane emission from rice fields as influenced by solar radiation, temperature, and straw incorporation. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 5, 335–350.
Sass R L, Fisher F M, Lewis S T, Jund M F and Turner F T 1994 Methane emission from rice fields: Effect of soil properties. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 8, 135–140.
Schütz H, Seiler W and Conrad R 1989 Processes involved in formation and emission of methane in rice paddies, Biogeochemistry 7, 33–53.
Schütz H, Seiler W and Conrad R 1990 Influence of soil temperature on methane emision from rice paddy fields. Biogeochemistry 11, 77–95.
SSSA/ASA — Soil Science Society of America/American Society of Agronomy 1996 Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3: Chemical Methods. Ed. D L Sparks. p 1390. SSSA Book Series No. 5, Madison, WI, USA.
Takai Y 1970 The mechanism of methane fermentation in flooded paddy soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 16, 313–316.
Wang Z P, De Laune R D, Masscheleyn P H and Patrick W H Jr 1993a Soil Redox and pH Effects on methane production in a flooded rice field. Soil Sci. Soc. A. J. 57, 382–385.
Wang Z P, Lindau C W, De Laune R D, and Patrick W H Jr 1993b Methane emission and entrapment in flooded rice soils as affected by soil properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils 16, 163–168.
Wassmann R, Wang M X, Shangguan X J, Xie X L, Shen R X, Papen H, Rennenberg H and Seiler W 1993 First records of a field experiment on fertilizer effects on methane emission from rice fields in Hunan Province (PR China). Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2071–2074.
Wassmann R, Neue H U, Lantin R S, Javellana M J, Diego R, Lignes V E, Hoffmann H, Papen H and Rennenberg H 1995 Methane emissions from rainfed rice. In IRRI — International Rice Research Institute, Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems. pp 217–225. Los Baños, Philippines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wassmann, R., Neue, H., Bueno, C. et al. Methane production capacities of different rice soils derived from inherent and exogenous substrates. Plant and Soil 203, 227–237 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004357411814
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004357411814