Plant and Soil

, Volume 199, Issue 2, pp 213–227 | Cite as

A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme

  • Mark Westoby


A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme is proposed. The axes would be specific leaf area SLA (light-capturing area deployed per dry mass allocated), height of the plant's canopy at maturity, and seed mass. All axes would be log-scaled. The strategy of a species would be described by its position in the volume formed by the three axes.

The advantages of the LHS scheme can be understood by comparing it to Grime's CSR scheme, which has Competitors, Stress-tolerators and Ruderals at the corners of a triangle. The CSR triangle is widely cited as expressing important strategic variation between species. The C–S axis reflects variation in responsiveness to opportunities for rapid growth; in the LHS scheme, SLA reflects the same type of variation. The R axis reflects coping with disturbance; in the LHS scheme, height and seed mass reflect separate aspects of coping with disturbance.

A plant ecology strategy scheme that permitted any species worldwide to be readily positioned within the scheme could bring substantial benefits for improved meta-analysis of experimental results, for placing detailed ecophysiology in context, and for coping with questions posed by global change. In the CSR triangle the axes are defined by reference to concepts, there is no simple protocol for positioning species beyond the reference datasets within the scheme, and consequently benefits of worldwide comparison have not materialized. LHS does permit any vascular land plant species to be positioned within the scheme, without time-consuming measurement of metabolic rates or of field performance relative to other species. The merits of the LHS scheme reside (it is argued) in this potential for worldwide comparison, more than in superior explanatory power within any particular vegetation region.

The LHS scheme avoids also two other difficulties with the CSR scheme: (a) It does not prejudge that there are no viable strategies under high stress and high disturbance (the missing quadrant in the CSR triangle compared to a two-axis rectangle); (b) It separates out two distinct aspects of the response to disturbance, height at maturity expressing the amount of growth attempted between disturbances, and seed mass (inverse of seed output per unit reproductive effort) expressing the capacity to colonize growth opportunities at a distance.

The advantage of LHS axes defined through a single readily-measured variable needs to be weighed against the disadvantage that single plant traits may not capture as much strategy variation as CSR's multi-trait axes. It is argued that the benefits of potential worldwide comparison do actually outweigh any decrease in the proportion of meaningful variation between species that is captured. Further, the LHS scheme opens the path to quantifying what proportion of variation in any other ecologically-relevant trait is correlated with the LHS axes. This quantification could help us to move forward from unprofitable debates of the past 30 years, where CSR opponents have emphasized patterns that were not accommodated within the scheme, while CSR proponents have emphasized patterns that the scheme did account for.

height of species canopy meta-analysis plant ecological strategy plant functional types seed mass specific leaf area 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aerts R and Van der Peijl M J 1993 A simple model to explain the dominance of low-productive perennials in nutrient-poor habitats. Oikos 66, 144–147.Google Scholar
  2. Austin M P and Smith T M 1989 A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 83, 35–47.Google Scholar
  3. Barkman J J 1988 New systems of plant growth forms and phenological plant types. In Plant Form and Vegetation Structure. Adaptation, Plasticity and Relation to Herbivory. Eds. M J A Werger, P J M van der Aart, H J During and J T A Verhoeven pp 9–44. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  4. Beadle N C W 1954 Soil phosphate and the delimitation of plant communities in eastern Australia. Ecology 35, 370–375.Google Scholar
  5. Begon M, Harper J L and Townsend C R 1996 Ecology. 3rd edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Box E O 1981 Macroclimate and Plant Forms. Dr W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Bugmann H 1996 Functional types of trees in temperate and boreal forests: classification and testing. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 359–370.Google Scholar
  8. Burke M J W and Grime J P 1996 An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77, 776–790.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell B D and Grime J P 1992 An experimental test of plant strategy theory. Ecology 73, 15–29.Google Scholar
  10. Chapin F S III 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 233–260.Google Scholar
  11. Chapin F S III 1991 Integrated responses of plants to stress. BioScience 41, 29–36.Google Scholar
  12. Chapin F S III, Autumn K and Pugnaire F (1993) Evolution of suites of traits in relation to environmental stress. American Naturalist 139, 1293–1304.Google Scholar
  13. Chapin F S III, Bret-Harte M, Syndonia M, Hobbie S E and Zhong H 1996 Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 347–358.Google Scholar
  14. Cockburn A 1991 An Introduction to Evolutionary Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Cody M L 1966 A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20, 174–184.Google Scholar
  16. Coley P D, Bryant J P and Chapin F S III 1985 Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defence. Science 230, 895–899.Google Scholar
  17. Colinvaux P 1993 Ecology 2. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Cornelissen J H C, Castro Diez P and Hunt R 1996 Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. Journal of Ecology 84, 755–765.Google Scholar
  19. Connell J H 1983 On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist 122, 661–696.Google Scholar
  20. Crawley M J 1983 Herbivory. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Crawley M J (Ed.) 1996 Plant Ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Cunningham S A, Summerhayes B and Westoby M Evolutionary divergences in leaf structure and chemistry, comparing rainfall and soil nutrient gradients. (In review).Google Scholar
  23. Dansereau P 1951 Description and recording of vegetation upon a structural basis. Ecology 32, 172–229.Google Scholar
  24. Denslow J S 1980 Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Biotropica (Supplement) 12, 47–55.Google Scholar
  25. Dyksterhuis E J 1949 Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2, 104–115.Google Scholar
  26. Ellenberg H 1988 Vegetation of Central Europe. 4th edition. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Feeny P 1976 Plant apparency and chemical defences. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 10, 1–41.Google Scholar
  28. Garnier E and Freijsen A H J 1994 On ecological inference from laboratory experiments conducted under optimum conditions. In A Whole-Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. Eds. J Roy and E Garnier. pp 267–292. SPB Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  29. Garnier E and Laurent G 1994 Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grasses. New Phytologist 128, 725–736.Google Scholar
  30. Garnier E 1992 Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species. Journal of Ecology 80, 665–675.Google Scholar
  31. Givnish T J 1995 Plant stems: biomechanical adaptation for energy capture and influence on species distributions. In Plant Stems. Ed. B L Gartner pp 3–49. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Goldberg D E 1996 Competitive ability: definitions, contingency and correlated traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 351, 1377–1385.Google Scholar
  33. Goldberg D E and Barton A M 1992 Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American Naturalist 139, 771–801.Google Scholar
  34. Greenslade P J M 1972 Evolution in the Staphylinid genus Priochirus (Coleoptera). Evolution 26, 203–220.Google Scholar
  35. Greenslade P J M 1983 Adversity selection and the habitat templet. American Naturalist 122, 352–365.Google Scholar
  36. Grime J P 1974 Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250, 26–31.Google Scholar
  37. Grime J P 1977 Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111, 1169–1194.Google Scholar
  38. Grime J P 1979 Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  39. Grime J P 1984 The ecology of species, families and communities of the contemporary British flora. New Phytologist 98, 15–33.Google Scholar
  40. Grime J P 1985 Towards a functional description of vegetation. In The Population Structure of Vegetation. Ed. J White. pp 503–514. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  41. Grime J P 1994a Defining the scope and testing the validity of CSR theory: a response to Midgley, Laurie and Le Maitre. Bulletin of the South African Institute of Ecologists 13, 4–7.Google Scholar
  42. Grime J P 1994b The role of plasticity in exploiting environmental heterogeneity. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity in Plants. Eds. M M Caldwell and R Pearcy. pp 1–18. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  43. Grime J P and Hillier S H 1992 The contribution of seedling regeneration to the structure and dynamics of plant communities and larger units of landscape. In Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Ed. M. Fenner. pp 349–364. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Grime J P and Hunt R 1975 Relative growth rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 63, 393–342.Google Scholar
  45. Grime J P, Hodgson J G and Hunt R 1988 Comparative Plant Ecology. Unwin-Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  46. Grime J P and 33 others 1997 Integrated screening validates a primary axis of specialization in plants. Oikos 79, 259–281.Google Scholar
  47. Grubb P J 1985 Plant populations and vegetation in relation to habitat, disturbance and competition: problems of generalization. In The Population Structure of Vegetation. Ed. J. White. pp 595–621. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  48. Grubb P J 1992 A positive distrust in simplicity — lessons from plant defences and from competition among plants and among animals. Journal of Ecology 80, 585–610.Google Scholar
  49. Gurevitch J, Morrow L L, Wallace A and Walsh J S 1992 A meta-analysis of field experiments on competition. American Naturalist 140, 539–572.Google Scholar
  50. Hairston N G Sr 1989 Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design and Execution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  51. Hubbell S P and Foster R B 1986 Commonness and rarity in a tropical forest: implications for tropical tree diversity. In Conservation Biology. Ed. M E Soule. pp 205–231. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  52. Hughes L, Dunlop M, French K, Leishman M, Rice B, Rodgerson L and Westoby M 1994 Predicting dispersal spectra: a minimal set of hypotheses based on plant attributes. Journal of Ecology 82, 933–950.Google Scholar
  53. Ingrouille M 1992 Diversity and Evolution of Land Plants. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  54. Keddy P A 1989 Competition. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Keddy P A 1992 A pragmatic approach to functional ecology. Functional Ecology 6, 621–626.Google Scholar
  56. Keddy P A and McLellan P 1992 Centrifugal organization in forests. Oikos 59, 75–84.Google Scholar
  57. King D A 1991 Tree size. National Geographic Research and Exploration 7, 342–351.Google Scholar
  58. Kitajima K 1994 Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation pattern as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees. Oecologia 98, 419–428.Google Scholar
  59. Körner Ch 1993 Scaling from species to vegetation: the usefulness of functional groups. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Eds. E-D Schulze and H A Mooney. pp 117–140. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  60. Lambers H and Poorter H 1992 Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23, 188–261.Google Scholar
  61. Lambers H, Konings H, Cambridge M L and Pons T L (Eds.) 1989 Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of Higher Plants. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  62. Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B and Ziegler H (Eds.) 1984 Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol 12B. Physiological Plant Ecology II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Leishman M R, Westoby M and Jurado E 1995 Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison of five temperate floras. Journal of Ecology 83, 517–530.Google Scholar
  64. Leps J, Osborna-Kosinova J and Rejmanek K 1982 Community stability, complexity and species life-history strategies. Vegetatio 50, 53–63.Google Scholar
  65. Loehle C 1988 Tree life history strategies: the role of defenses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18, 209–222.Google Scholar
  66. Loveless A R 1961 A nutritional interpretation of sclerophylly based on differences in chemical composition of sclerophyllous and mesophytic leaves. Annals of Botany 25, 168–184.Google Scholar
  67. MacArthur R H and Wilson E O 1967 The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  68. Mueller-Dombois D and Ellenberg H 1974 Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Mulkey S S, Chazdon R L and Smith A P (Eds.) 1996 Tropical Forest Plant Ecophysiology. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  70. Myerscough P J 1990 Comparative plant ecology and the quest for understanding of Australian plants. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 112, 189–199.Google Scholar
  71. Noble I R and Slatyer R O 1980 The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43, 5–21.Google Scholar
  72. Orshan G 1989 Plant Pheno-Morphological Studies in Mediterranean Ecosystems. Geobotany Volume 12, Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  73. Poorter H 1989 Interspecific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity in Higher Plants. Eds. H Lambers et al. pp 45–68. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  74. Poorter H 1994 Construction costs and payback time of biomass: a whole plant perspective. In A Whole-Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. Eds. J Roy and E Garnier. pp 111–127. SPB Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  75. Poorter H and Lambers H 1991 Is interspecific variation in relative growth rate positively correlated with biomass allocation to the leaves? American Naturalist 138, 1264–1268.Google Scholar
  76. Poorter H and Remkes C 1990 Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rates. Oecologia 83, 553–559.Google Scholar
  77. Poorter H What do we know about fast and slow-growing species from nutrient-poor and nutrient-rich habitats? In Variation in Plant Growth. Eds. H Lambers, H Poorter and M van Vuuren Backhuys, Leiden (In press).Google Scholar
  78. Prentice I C, Cramer W, Harrison S P, Leemans R, Monserud R A and Solomon A M 1992 A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  79. Price P W, Westoby M, Rice B, Atsatt P R, Fritz R S, Thompson J N and Mobley K 1986 Parasite mediation in ecological interactions. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 17, 487–505.Google Scholar
  80. Ramenskii L G 1938 Introduction to the Geobotanical Study of Complex Vegetations. Selkosgiz, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  81. Raunkiaer C 1934 The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  82. Reich P B, Walters M B and Ellsworth D S 1992 Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62, 365–392.Google Scholar
  83. Reich P B, Walters M B and Ellsworth D S 1997 From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94, 13730–13734.Google Scholar
  84. Rhoades D F and Cates R G 1976 Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 10, 168–213.Google Scholar
  85. Richards P W 1952 The Tropical Rainforest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  86. Roy J and Garnier E (Eds.) 1994 A Whole-Plant Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen Interactions. SPB Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  87. Sarmiento G and Monasterio M 1983 Life forms and phenology. In Ecosystems of the World 13: Tropical Savannas. Ed. F Bourliere pp 79–108. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  88. Saverimuttu T and Westoby M 1996 Seedling survival under deep shade in relation to seed size. Journal of Ecology 84, 681–689.Google Scholar
  89. Schoener T W 1983 Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122, 240–285.Google Scholar
  90. Schulze E-D and Caldwell M M (Eds.) 1994 Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  91. Shugart H H and Urban D L 1989 Factors affecting the relative abundance of forest tree species. In Toward a More Exact Ecology. Eds. P J Grubb and J B Whittaker. pp 249–274. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
  92. Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J and Strohmeier K 1985 Predation, competition and prey communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 269–311.Google Scholar
  93. Smith R L 1990 Ecology and Field Biology, 4th edition. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  94. Smith T and Huston M 1989 A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio 83, 49–69.Google Scholar
  95. Smith T M, Shugart H H and Woodward F I (Eds.) 1997 Plant Functional Types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Southwood T R E 1977 Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 337–365.Google Scholar
  97. Spurr S H and Barnes B V 1980 Forest Ecology, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  98. Steffen W L, Walker B H, Ingram J S and Koch G W (Eds.) 1992 Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems: The Operational Plan. International Geosphere-Biosphere Program, IGBP Report No. 21, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  99. Swanborough P and Westoby M 1996 Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts. Functional Ecology 10, 176–184.Google Scholar
  100. Tilman D 1982 Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Tilman D 1988 Plant Strategies and the Structure and Dynamics of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Tilman D 1990 Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58, 3–15.Google Scholar
  103. Turner I M 1994 A quantitative analysis of leaf form in woody plants from the world's major broadleaved forest types. Journal of Biogeography 21, 413–419.Google Scholar
  104. Van der Werf A, Van Nuenen M, Visser A J and Lambers H 1993 Contribution of physiological and morphological plant traits to a species' competitive ability at high and low nitrogen supply. Oecologia 94, 434–440Google Scholar
  105. Westoby M 1980 Elements of a theory of vegetation dynamics in arid rangelands. Israel Journal of Botany 28, 169–194.Google Scholar
  106. Westoby M, Leishman M R and Lord J M 1996 Comparative ecology of seed size and seed dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 351, 1309–1318.Google Scholar
  107. Whitmore T C 1975 Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  108. Whittaker R H 1975 Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  109. Wilson J B and Agnew A D Q 1992 Positive-feedback switches in plant communities. Advances in Ecological Research 23, 263–336.Google Scholar
  110. Witkowski E T F and Lamont B B 1991 Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness. Oecologia 88, 486–493.Google Scholar
  111. Woodward F I and Cramer W 1996 Plant functional types and climatic change: introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 306–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Westoby
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations