Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can People Explain Their Own Vote? Introspective Questions as Indicators of Salience in the 1995 Quebec Referendum on Sovereignty

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most scholars doubt that voters are able to explain their own vote. We argue that introspective questions whereby respondents are invited to tell, in their own words, the reasons why they vote the way they do, provide useful information on which considerations are most salient in their voting decisions. We show that open-ended questions about reasons for voting Yes or No in the 1995 Quebec referendum on sovereignty help us to sort out subgroups of voters for whom a given consideration is more salient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, John H. & Nelson, Forrest D. (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, André, Martin, Pierre, & Nadeau, Richard (1995). Attentes économiques et linguistiques et appui à la souveraineté du Québec: Une analyse prospective et comparative. Canadian Journal of Political Science 28: 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagle, Timothy & Mitchell, Glenn E., II (1992). Goodness of Fit Measures for Probit and Logit. American Journal of Political Science 36: 762–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, & Curtice, John (1985). How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Stanley Jr. (1983). Interpreting Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R. (1989). Construct Accessibility and Electoral Choice. Political Behavior 11: 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Pierre (1994). Générations politiques, rationalité économique et appui à la souveraineté du Québec. Canadian Journal of Political Science 27: 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, Richard & Fleury, Christopher (1995). Gains linguistiques anticipés et appui à la souveraineté du Québec. Canadian Journal of Political Science 28: 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard & Wilson, Timothy (1977). Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84: 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, Wendy, Krosnick, Jon A., & Breuning, Marijke (1994). Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation. American Journal of Political Science 38: 582–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • RePass, David E. (1971). Issue Salience and Party Choice. American Political Science Review 65: 389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, & Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. André Blais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Nadeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blais, A., Martin, P. & Nadeau, R. Can People Explain Their Own Vote? Introspective Questions as Indicators of Salience in the 1995 Quebec Referendum on Sovereignty. Quality & Quantity 32, 355–366 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004301524340

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004301524340

Keywords

Search

Navigation