Skip to main content
Log in

Reason rules...: the utility of rationality and the rationality of utility

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Almost every theory of human behavior is based upon some assumption of rationalty. Such an assumption is commonly believed to be necessary in order to distinguish rational behavior, which is, from non-rational behavior, which is not amenable to scientific investigation. This article presents a thorough re-examination of this assumption, an inquiry which turns out to raise all the central issues of both the methodology and the theory of behavioral inquiry generally. It leads to the somewhat surprising conclusion that the notion of rationality does not have any meaningful role to play in behavioral inquiry, and that there is no sense in distinguishing rational from non-rational or irrational behavior. It also shows that the generalization of the utility notion in terms of information makes it into a much more powerful and subtle tool of analysis than it commonly appears to be taken for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassi, Joseph and Jarvie, Ian Charles (ed). (1987). Rationality: The Critical View, Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Philip W., Arrow, Kenneth J. and Pines, David (eds.) (1988). The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, Gunnar (ed.) (1984). Rationality in Science and Politics. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P. W. (1982). The Second Law. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Kenneth N. (1990). Social Entropy Theory. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Kenneth N. (1994a). Sociology and the New Systems Theory: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Kenneth N. (1994b). ‘Talcott Parsons, social entropy theory, and living systems theory’, Behavioral Science 39(1): 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Bernard (1992). ‘Neofunctionalism and the theory of the social system’, in Colomy (ed.), 1990, pp. 36–55.

  • Barrow, John D. (1988). The World Within the World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian and Hardin, Russell (eds.) (1982). Rational Man and Irrational Society?: An Introduction and Sourcebook, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David E., Raiffa, Howard and Tversky, Arnos (eds.) (1988). Decision-Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S. I. and Mortimore, G. W. (eds.) (1976). Rationality and the Social Sciences: Contributions to the Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillouin, Leon (1956). Science and Information Theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Harold I. (1988). Rationality, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Jeremy (1982). Grammatical Man. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, John L. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a Paradoxical World Through the Science of Surprise. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. and Thomas J. Fararo (eds.) (1992). Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomy, Paul (ed.) (1992). The Dynamics of Social Systems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Karen S. and Levi, Margaret (eds.) (1990). The Limits of Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, Peter and Highfield, Roger (1991). The Arrow of Time: The Quest to Solve Science's Greatest Mystery. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvitanovié, Pedrag (1989). Universality in Chaos. Bristol: Adam Hilger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagevos, J. C. (1994). ‘Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek naar Macht en Afhankelijkheid: Een Ter reinverkenning’, (Scientific Research of Power and Dependence: An Exploration), Acta Politica xxviii(2): 179–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagevos, J. C., (1994). Naar een Sociaal Interactiemodel: Over de Dynamiek van Wetenschap, Macht en Afhankelijkheid (Towards a Model of Social Interaction: On the Dynamics of Science, Power, and Dependence). Bilthoven: Prime Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaney, Robert L. (1986). An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (1983). The Behavioral Function: An Inquiry into the Relation between Behavior and Utility’, Theory and Decision 15: 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (1990). Order and Disorder in the Human Universe: The Foundations of Behavioral and Social Science, 3 vols. Bilthoven: Prime Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (1991). ‘Chaos in Europe: An inquiry into the nature of social systems and the methodology of the behavioral sciences’, Acta Politica xxvi(1): 25–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (1993). ‘Power and the dynamics of behavior’, Quality & Quantity 27: 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (1994a). ‘The meaning and measurement of behavior’, Quality & Quantity 28: 383–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (1994b) ‘Information in nature, human behavior, and social life’, Behavioral Science 39(2): 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vree, Johan K. (forthcoming a). ‘Theory, reality, and information’.

  • De Vree, Johan K. (forthcoming b). From Logic to Number: An Introduction to Mathematics.

  • Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter (eds.) (1990). The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon (1979). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon (1983). Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fano, Robert M. (1961). Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. New York: MIT/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas J. (1989). The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology: Tradition and Formalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenn, John B. (1982). Engines, Energy, and Entropy: A Thermodynamic Primer. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Alan Page (1993). Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, Murray (1994). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex,. London: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, James (1988). Chaos: Making a New Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, Gibon (1968). The Logic of Choice: An Investigation of the Concepts of Rule and Rationality. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. (ed.) (1984). Chaos and Order in Nature. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Nina (ed.) (1991). The New Scientist Guide to Chaos. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Ross (ed.) (1979). Rational Action: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, Stephen W. (1989). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. Toronto: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, Barry (1988). Choice, Rationality, and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas (1992) [1651], Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, Robin M. and Reder, Melvin W. (eds.) (1987). Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, J. P. (1988). Thermodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. (1967). The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen, Erica (ed.) (1990). 1989 Lectures in Complex Systems. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalineman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul and Tversky, Amos (eds.) (1982). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, Stephen H. (1993). In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontopoulos, Kyriakos M. (1993). The Logics of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Roger (1993). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loye, David and Eisler, Riane (1987). ‘Chaos and Transformation: Implications of Nonequilibrium Theory for Social Science and Society’, Behavioral Science 32: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow, K. and Over, D. E. (eds.) (1993). Rationality: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert (1991). ‘The Chaotic Rhythms of Life’, in Hall (ed.), pp. 82–95.

  • Moser, Paul K. (ed.) (1990). Rationality in Action: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, Michael (1992). Rationality and the Analysis of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, Grégoire and Prigogine, Ilya (1977). Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, Grégoire and Prigogine, Ilya (1989). Exploring Complexity: An Introduction. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, Heinz R. (1989). The Dreams of Reason: The Computer and the Rise of the Sciences of Complexity. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, F. David (1991). The Philosopher's Stone: Chaos, Synchronicity, and the Hidden Order of the World. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, David (ed.) (1987). Emerging Syntheses in Science. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle (1985). Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicolas (1988). Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry Into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, Jeremy and Howard, Ted (1989). Entropy: Into the Greenhouse World. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George (1990). ‘The Current Status of Sociological Theory: The New Syntheses’, in Ritzer (ed.) pp. 1–30.

  • Ritzer, George (ed.) (1990). Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, George (1992). Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, David (1993). Chance and Chaos. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seydel, Rüdiger (1988). From Equilibrium to Chaos: Practical Bifurcation and Stability Theory. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude A. and Weaver, Warren (1959). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1982). Bounded Rationality. 2 vols., Cambridge MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1988). ‘Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought’, in Bell et al. (eds.), pp. 58–77.

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1990). ‘Bounded Rationality’, in Eatwell et al. (eds.), pp. 295–302.

  • Simon, Herbert, Egidi, Massimo, Marris, Robin and Viale, Riccardo (1992). Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. Aldershot: Eward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Daniel L. (ed.) (1989). Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Ian (1990). Does God Play Dice?: The New Mathematics of Chaos. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, Tom (1990). Information and the Structure of the Universe: An Exploration into Information Physics. London: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier, Tom (1992). Beyond Information: The Natural History of Intelligence. London: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, Keith (1984). Introduction to Statistical mechanics and Thermodynamics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Jonathan II. (1990). ‘The Past, Present, and Future of Theory in American Sociology’, in Ritzer (ed.), pp. 371–391.

  • Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1988). ‘Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions’, in Bell et al. (eds.), pp. 167–192.

  • Waldrop, M. Mitchell (1993). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. Harmondsworth: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Ruth A. and Wolf, Alison (1991). Contemporary Sociological Theory: Continuing the Classical Tradition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, Malcolm (1994). Modern Sociological Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1976) [1921], Wirtschaft and Gesellschaft: Grundriss der Verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, Norbert (1990). ‘The History of Politics and Recent Sociological Theory’, in Ritzer (ed.), pp. 391, 392–415.

  • Zemansky, Mark and Dittman, Richard H. (1981). Heat and Thermodynamics: An Intermediate Textbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Vree, J.K., Dagevos, J.C. Reason rules...: the utility of rationality and the rationality of utility. Quality & Quantity 31, 233–267 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004298330577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004298330577

Navigation