Skip to main content
Log in

Formulating Hypotheses Graphically in Social Research

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the proposition that the appropriate use of suitable forms of graphic communication can improve the formulation and presentation of hypotheses in quantitative social science research. The creative nature of scientific diagrams is discussed and the technological advances in computer graphic media are seen as part of a ‘visual revolution’ which is markedly changing not only the way we see things but also the way we think and do things today. Brief historical views on the use of hypotheses and diagrammatic languages in science are given. The restricted use of graphic communication tools in social research academic documents is discussed and the importance of using well-designed data graphics in the production and transmission of scientific knowledge is highlighted. Hypotheses are conceptualised and their importance within social research is emphasised. A methodological approach for formulating hypotheses graphically is proposed based on the use of three types of language: notation, statement (ordinary language) and diagram. Some criteria are suggested for the selection of diagram type dependent on the related variables. Several examples are given covering the different models proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, W. (1989). An ergonomic approach to Bertin's method of graphically displaying multivariate data. Information Design Journal 5: 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, F. J. (1973). Graphs in statistical analysis. American Statistician 27: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banck, G. (1985). Poverty, politics and the shaping of urban space: a Brazilian example. MS presented at the 45th Congress of Americanistas, Bogota, 1–7 July (cited in Ward & Chant, 1987).

  • Bell, J. (1993). Doing Your Research Project (2nd edn). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A. D. (1990). The Playfair enigma: the development of the schematic representation of statistics. Information Design Journal 6: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M. (1970). An Introduction to Social Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. & Duncan, C. (1990). Quantitative Data Analysis for Social Scientists. London and New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daru, M. (1989). The culture of quantitative graphicacy. Information Design Journal 5: 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaus, D. A. (1991). Surveys in Social Research (3rd edn). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaus, D. A. & McAllister, I. (1987). Gender differences in religion: a test of structural location theory. American Sociological Review 52: 472–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, S. (1977). The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press (cited in Ward & Chant, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopaedia Americana (1978). Vol 14. Danbury, Conn.: Americana Corporation.

  • Enrick, N. L. (1972). Effective Graphic Communication. Princeton: Auerbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, K. (1979). Some general characteristics present in diagrams denoting activity, event and relationship. Information Design Journal 1: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grush, J., Clore, G. & Costin, F. (1975). Dissimilarity and attraction: when difference makes a difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 783–789 (cited in Kerlinger, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N. (1984). Designer's Guide to Creating Charts and Diagrams. New York: Watson-Guptill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H., Rivlin, L. & Proshansky, H. M. (1970). The use of behavioral maps in environmental psychology. In: H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson & L. Rivlin (eds), Environmental Psychology: Man and His Physical Setting. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. R. & Keller, M. M. (1993). Visual Cues — Practical Data Visualisation. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioural Research (3rd edn). New York: CBS College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, G. (1979). Writing to inform: making it readable. Information Design Journal 1: 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, A. (1969). Diagrams — A Visual Survey of Graphs, Maps, Charts and Diagrams for the Graphic Designer. London: Studio Vista.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald-Ross, M. (1979). Scientific diagrams and the generation of plausible hypotheses: an essay in the history of ideas. Instructional Science 8: 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinlay, N. J. (1994). Culture Shock: International Students and the Psychological Effects of a Change in Cultural Environment. B.Sc. final year report, Loughborough University of Technology.

  • Mauch, J. E. & Birch, J. W. (1983). Guide to the Successful Thesis and Dissertation. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montano, J. (1976). Los Pobres de la Ciudad de Mexico en los Asentamientos Espontaneos. Mexico, DF: Siglo XXI (cited in Ward & Chant, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, A. (1984). A study of slums and slum improvement in Madras. Report from a study period in Madras. Aalborg, Denmark: Institute of Development and Planning. (Mimeo) (cited in Ward & Chant, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidhaar, J. W. (1984). An overview of nontabular methods for statistical presentation of data before this century. Information Design Journal 4: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, C. F. & Schmid, S. E. (1979). Handbook of Graphic Presentation (2nd edn). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suefeld, P. & Rank, A. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 169–178 (cited in Kerlinger, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, G. K. & Beard, R. M. (1981). What Is Educational Research? Perspectives on Techniques of Research. Aldershot: Gower (cited in Bell, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. H. W. (1979). Four aspects of graphic communication — An introduction to this issue. Instructional Science 8: 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. & Chant, S. (1987). Community leadership and self-help housing. Progress in Planning 27: 69–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildbur, P. (1989). Information Graphics — A Survey of Typographic, Diagrammatic and Cartographic Communication. London: Trefoil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzling, L. P. & Greenstreet, R. C. (1989). Presenting Statistics — A Manager's Guide to the Persuasive Use of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bezerra, R.F., Jalloh, S. & Stevenson, J. Formulating Hypotheses Graphically in Social Research. Quality & Quantity 32, 327–353 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004297832762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004297832762

Keywords

Navigation