Skip to main content
Log in

Tibbles the Cat -- Reply to Burke

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bogdan, R.J. (1986): Roderick M. Chisholm, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M.B. (1996): ‘Tibbles the Cat: A Modern Sophisma’, Philosophical Studies 84, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. (1962): Reference and Generality, Ithaca: Cornell University Press (third edition 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. (1973): ‘Ontological Relativity and Relative Identity’, in M.K. Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (1990): The Ontology of Physical Objects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Inwagen, P. (1981): ‘The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1967): Identity and Spatio Temporal Continuity, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1968): ‘On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time’, Philosophical Review 77.

  • Wiggins, D. (1980): Sameness and Substance, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noonan, H.W. Tibbles the Cat -- Reply to Burke. Philosophical Studies 95, 215–218 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004293524233

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004293524233

Navigation