Skip to main content
Log in

The Language of Thought and The Embodied Nature of Language Use

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (1991): Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1989): Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1993): Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997): Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1975): The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1980): ‘Methodological SolipsismConsidered As a Research Strategy in Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Science 3, 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1987): ‘Why There Still Has to Be A Language of Thought’, in Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. and McLaughlin, B.P. (1989): ‘Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity: Why Smolensky's Solution Doesn't Work’, Cognition 35, 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. and Pylyshyn, Z. (1988): ‘Connectionismand Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, Cognition 28, 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1966): The Senses Considered as Perceptual System, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1970): ‘On Theories for Visual Space Perception’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 11, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979): The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1983): Semantics and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. and Landau, B. (1992): ‘Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition’, in R. Jackendoff (ed.), Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987): The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1992): ‘Philosophical Implications of Cognitive Semantics’, Cognitive Linguistics 3, 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993): ‘Why Cognitive Semantics Matters to Philosophy’, Cognitive Linguistics 4, 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, L.J. (1995): ‘The Language of Thought’, Philosophy of Science 62, 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987): Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1993): ‘The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980): Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.W. (1982): ‘Space Grammar, Analysability, and the English Passive’, Language 58, 22–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.W. (1987): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.W. (1991a): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume II: Descriptive Application, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.W. (1991b): Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1989): Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (1995): ‘Against Methodological Solipsism: The Ecological Approach’, Philosophical Psychology 8, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. (1992): ‘Toward a Microstructural Account of Human Reasoning’, in S. Davis (ed.), Connectionism: Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J.L., and Hinton, G.E. (1986): ‘Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models’, in J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing, Vol. 2: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1987): ‘The Constituent Structure of Connectionist Mental States: A Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 26(Supplement), 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1988): ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1991): ‘Connectionism, Constituency and the Language of Thought’, in B. Loewer and G. Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, E.E. (1990): From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L (1983): ‘How Language Structures Space’, in H. Pick and L. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1962): Thought and Language (E. Hanfmann and C. Vakar, Trans.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teng, N.Y. The Language of Thought and The Embodied Nature of Language Use. Philosophical Studies 94, 237–251 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004257313833

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004257313833

Navigation