Skip to main content
Log in

Case study principles for different types of cases

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental research practices encouraging scientific control and explicit measurement have been criticized for dealing with management and organizational dynamics as if they were hypothetical, static, and unreal. There have been a number of calls for a more qualitative and relevant approach which provides more in-depth knowledge of cases. Certain principles and practices have been offered to assist researchers, yet there has been much debate on their application. Some researchers have suggested case study principles supporting intensive case analysis while others have indicated the importance of comparisons. This paper first provides a listing of common case study approaches, each of which is used for different purposes. Some of these approaches are used for descriptive research, some for encouraging discovery, and others for establishing proof. The identification of principles for a type of case study evolve out of the type of knowledge and information the researcher is seeking to gather. Narratives, explanatory, and interpretative cases tend to use historical information focused around questions, criteria, a sequence of occurrence, or testimonials. Tabulations, comparative studies, and diagnostic and experimental action research cases seem to be more complex in the variety of data they summarize. Survey cases stand on their own as researchers use them much like they are gathering survey data from a large sample. This paper suggests that different types of case studies need to be judged by unique principles or assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, G. T. (1971). The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1970). Intervention Theory and Method, a Behavioral Review. Reading, Mass: Addison-Weseley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R. & Smith, D. M., (1985). Action Science. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, (1985). Making knowledge more relevant to practice: maps for action, pp. 79-106 in E. E. Lawler III, A. M. Mohrman Jr., S. A. Mohrman, T. A. Cummings & Associates (eds), Doing Research that is Useful for Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R. & Weatherby, R. P. (1985) Developing ‘complicated’ understanding in administrators, Academy of Management Review 8: 262-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, A. (1942). A method for investigating individual and group ideology. Sociometry 5, 371-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B. (1989). Permitting creativity in science, in D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (eds), Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems, MIS Quarterly 11: 369-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridger, H. (1946). The Northfield Experiment, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 6: 71-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin 56: 81-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. (Also published as: “Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research on teaching”, in N. L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNalley (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. W. (1976). (ed.), Experimenting with Organizational Life: The Action Research Approach. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, S. M. (1953). Action Research to Improve School Practices. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsini, R. & Marsella, A. J. (1983). Personality Theories, Research Assessment. Itasca, Illinois: Peacock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (1964). The Bureacratic Phenomemon. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G. & Huse, E. (1989). Organizational Development and Change. St. Paul, Minn: West Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, B. (1993). Action Research and Organizational Development. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. & Wiginton, J. (1979). Language and organization, Academy of Management Review 4: 179-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (1983). Learning the craft of organizational research, Academy of Management Review 8: 539-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, M. (1959). Men who Manage. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act. (2nd edn). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1967). The Use of Lateral Thinking. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, W. H. (1988). Letter to the Editor. MIS Quarterly, December, p. 521.

  • Dyer, Jr, W. G. & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt, Academy of Management Review 16: 613-619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1989). Strategic options development and analysis — SODA, pp. 21-42 in J. Rosenhead (ed.), Rational Analysis for Problematic World. London, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. & Ackermann, F. (1989). Strategic option development and analysis — using a computer to help with the management of strategic vision, pp. 208-224 in G. I. Doukidis, F. Land & G. Miller (eds), Knowledge-Based Management Support Systems. Chichester, Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review 14: 532-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparativelogic, Academy of Management Review 16: 620-627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, C. (1986). Peak Performers: The New Heroes of American Business. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1954).

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1971). The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C. (1981). Maps of the Mind. New York: Macmillan. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1976). The Managerial Choice. Dow Jones-Irwin.

  • Homans, G. C. (1967). The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. R. T. (1986). The Vital Few: American Economic Progress and Its Protagonists. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacocca, L. (1984). Iacocca: An Autobiography. New York: Bantam Books, 53-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: how managers construe key organizational events, Academy of Management Journal 33: 7-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, R. R., Osborn, R. N. & Martin, R. N. (1980). Structured content analysis of cases: a complementary method of organizational research, Academy of Munagement Review 5: 517-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action, Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 602-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolations (2nd edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics, Human relations 1: 5-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, N. R. F. (1958). The Appraisal Interview. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, K. E., Castaldi, R. M. & Dollinger, M. J. (1989). Content analysis in entrepreneurship research: the case of initial public offerings, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 14: 51-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, A. J. (1958). The Action Theorist. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micceris, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures, Psychological Bulletin 105: 156-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (1979). Qualitative as an attractive nuisance: the problem of analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 580-589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of ‘direct’ research, Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 582-589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1985). An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations, Academy of Management Review 10: 192-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research, Academy of Management Review 5: 491-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. L. (1978). The use of influence diagrams in structuring complex decision problems, Proceedings Second Lawrence Symposium on Systems and Decision Sciences.

  • Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Companies. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. (1993). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (1981). Issues of validity in new paradigm research, pp. 239-250 in P. Reason & J. Rowan (eds), Human Inquiry: a Source-Book of New Paradigm Research. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. M. (1989). Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The Volunteer Subject. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, A. (1979). The Emerging Goddess: The Creative Process in Art, Science, and Other Fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, L. & Strauss, A. L. (1973). Field Research: stratgies for a Natural Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, D. P. (1985). Reviewing especially based manuscripts: perspectives on process. pp. 172-173, in L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (eds), Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949). T. V. A. and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. & Mitroff, I. (1984). Enhancing organizational research utilization: the role of decision makers' assumptions, Academy of Management Review 9: 18-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, D. A. (1985). Entrepreneurial Megabucks: The 100 Greatest Entrepreneurs of the Last Twenty-Five Years. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. & Glass, G. V. (1987). Research and Evaluation in Education and the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, S. (1952). The making of a Poem, pp. 112-125 in Ghiselin & Brewster (eds), The Creative Process. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G. I. & Evered, R. D. (1978). “An assessment of the scientific relevance of action research”, Administrative Science Quarterly 23: 583-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert, W. R. (1981). Why educational research has been so uneducational; The case for a new model of social science based on collaborative inquiry, P. Reason & J. Rowan, (eds), pp. 141-152 in Human Inquiry: a Source-Book of New Paradigm Research. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations, Academy of Management Review 14: 551-561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting, Human Relations 4: 3-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. & Murray, H. (1993). The Social Engagement of Social Science: Selected Writings Members of the Tavistock Institute. Volume II.

  • Vaillant, G. (1977). Adaptation to Life. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnology, Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 539-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1983). Qualitative Methodology. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, J. N. (1992). How much can we learn from success?, Academy of Management Executive 6: 56-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D. & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1955). Street Corner Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. & Hamilton, E. L. (1967). Action Research for Management. Homewood, Illinois: R. D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: some answers, Administrative Science Quarterly 58-65.

  • Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, J.B. Case study principles for different types of cases. Quality & Quantity 31, 401–423 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004254420302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004254420302

Keywords

Navigation