Abstract
Some results of an investigation are presented in which answers on some basic variables (occupation and education) are registered in several ways. The variables were measured in a setting in which the registration was to occur as fast as possible. All registrations went by using a computer. The registrations were checked a few weeks afterwards. This gives information about the reliability of the registrations.
About 70% of those having a job reported the same occupation during the registration and the check. For educational level the same answer was given in about 80% of the cases. People not in the labour process reported both times nearly identical. Typing the labels resembles most the way employees at registration desks work. Choosing, however, from a list gives more reliable results.
Causes of differences in assignments are discussed, and recommendations for improvement are given.
References
CBS (1984). Beroepenclassificatie 1984. Voorburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
CBS (1987). Standaard onderwijs indeling 1978. Voorburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J.H. & Portocarero, L. (1982). Social Fluidity in Industrial Nations: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology 33, 1–34.
Kimbrell, R.B. (1988). Searching for Text? Send an N-Gram. Byte 13, 297–312.
Popping, R. & Peschar, J.L. (1994). Next patient: A feasibility study into registration of occupational and educational titles in hospitals, in: J.P. Mackenbach (ed.), Sociaal-economische gezondheidsverschillen onderzocht, Vol. VII, Rijswijk: Ministerie van WVC, pp. 103–118.
Popping, R. (1995). Registration of basic variables. Some remarks, in J.J. Hox and W. Jansen (eds.), Measurement Problems in Social and Behavioral Research, Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm, pp. 161–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popping, R. Reliability of registrations: a feasibility study into registration of occupational and educational titles in hospitals. Quality & Quantity 31, 305–315 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004250414647
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004250414647