Skip to main content
Log in

Some brief notes on the “unfinished business” of qualitative inquiry

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper argues that there are a variety of ”implicit” issues in qualitative inquiry that need to be addressed if the area is to develop in some “normal science” sense. This “unfinished business” is concerned with a deeper investigation of basic terms that are now simply taken for granted, such as “theme” and “pattern”. It also includes the need to develop “rules” which will assist in making and justifying how qualitative interpretations are made from the implicit processes of inference. Specific suggestions are made for accomplishing these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd, R. (1981). Scientific realism and naturalistic epistemology, in P. Asquith (ed.), PSA 1980. Vol. 2, E. Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1994). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology?, British Journal of Sociology 35: 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, second edition, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) (1994). The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickelman, N. et al. (1989). The NLN Criteria for Appraisal of Baccalaureate Programs: A Critical Hermeneutic Analysis, New York: National League for Nursing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E.W. (1991). The Enlightened Eye, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1994). Philosophy of Science and its Discontents, New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. (1988). Explaining Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G.N. & Mulkay, M. 1984. Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, J.P. & LeCompte, J.P. (1984). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. (ed.) (1990). The Paradigm Dialog, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. (1993). Dividing Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. (1988). Science as a Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J. & Miller, M. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.

  • Knorr-Centia, K.D. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Knowledge, 2nd edn., Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. & Huberrnan, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Date Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods, Newberry Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.I. & Fredericks, M. (1991). Postpositivistic assumptions and educational research: Another view, Educational Researcher 20(4): 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (1987). Fact and Method, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.I. & Fredericks, M. (1991). Postpositivistic assumptions and educational research: Another view, Educational Researcher 26(4): 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mider, R. (1987). Fact and Method, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molette, R. et al. (1994). Applied Social Research: Tool for the Human Services, Chicago Harcourt-Brace.

  • Quine, W.V.O.: (1960). Word and Object, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1969). Epistemology Naturalized, in Ontological Relativity, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1981). Prototype classification and logical classification, in E. Scholrick (ed.), New Trends in Cognitive Representations: Challenges to Piaget's Theory, Hillsdale: Erlbahm Associates, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. (1987). Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.D. (1993). Hermeneutics and Qualitative Inquiry, in D.J. Flinders and G.E. Mills (eds.), Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy, London/Ontario: University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster's II (1992). New York: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1994). Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H.F. (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fredericks, M., Miller, S.I. Some brief notes on the “unfinished business” of qualitative inquiry. Quality & Quantity 31, 1–13 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004234404801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004234404801

Keywords

Navigation