Policy Sciences

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 217–231 | Cite as

Teaching the policy sciences: Reflections on a graduate seminar

  • Ronald D. Brunner
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, C. (1965). ‘A city is not a tree,’ Architectural Forum 122: 58–62 and 58-61 (April and May).Google Scholar
  2. Brunner, R. D. (1991). ‘The policy movement as a policy problem,’ Policy Sciences 24: 65–98.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. (1996). After Thought: The Computer Challenge to Human Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Brunner, R. D. (1994). ‘Myth and American politics,’ Policy Sciences 27: 1–18.Google Scholar
  5. Brunner, R. D. (1996). ‘A milestone in the policy sciences,’ Policy Sciences 29: 45–68.Google Scholar
  6. Brunner, R. D. and W. Ascher (1992). ‘Science and social responsibility,’ Policy Sciences 25: 295–331.Google Scholar
  7. Doughty, P. F. (1987). ‘Vicos: success, rejection and rediscovery of a classic program,’ in E.M. Eddy and W. L. Partridge, eds., Applied Anthropology in America, 2nd ed., Ch.19. NewYork: Columbia University Press, pp. 433–459.Google Scholar
  8. Falk, R. J. (1995). ‘Casting the spell: The New Haven School of International Law,’ Yale Law Journal 104: 1991–2008.Google Scholar
  9. Fish, S. (1996). ‘Professor Sokal's bad joke,’ NewYork Times (May 21): A13 (National Edition).Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, M. (1953). ‘The methodology of positive economics,’ in his Positive Economics, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
  11. Horgan J. (1966). The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lasswell, H. D. (1956). ‘The political science of science: An inquiry into the possible reconciliation of mastery and freedom,’ American Political Science Review 50: 961–979.Google Scholar
  14. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. NewYork: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Laswell, H. D. (1966). ‘The world revolution of our time: a framework for basic policy research,’ in H.D. and D. Lerner (eds.), World Revolutionary Elites: Studies in Coercive Ideological Movements, Ch. 2. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, pp. 29–96.Google Scholar
  16. Laswell, H. D. and M. S. McDougal (1943). ‘Legal education and public policy: Professional training in the public interest,’ Yale Law Journal 52: 203–295.Google Scholar
  17. Lasswell, H. D. and M. S. McDougal (1992). Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Science and Policy. New Haven, CT and Dordrecht, The Netherlands: New Haven Press and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Leone, R. C. (1996). ‘Something must be done,’ NewYork Times (June 19): A15.Google Scholar
  19. Michael, D. N. (1995). ‘Barriers and bridges to learning in a turbulent human ecology,’ in L.H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light, eds., Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, Ch.11. NewYork: Columbia University Press, pp. 461–485.Google Scholar
  20. Perry, W. G. (1985). ‘Different worlds in the same classroom: students' evolution in their vision of knowledge and their expectations of teachers,’ On Learning and Teaching (May): 1–17.Google Scholar
  21. Sokal, A. (1996). ‘A physicist experiments with cultural studies,’ Lingua Franca (May/June): 62–64.Google Scholar
  22. Tenner, E. (1996).Why Thinks Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. NewYork: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald D. Brunner
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Public Policy ResearchUniversity of ColoradoBoulderU.S.A

Personalised recommendations