Abstract
Sand packed to a constant dry bulk density, is frequently used as an artificial growth medium in which to simulate the effects of a constant mechanical impedance on root growth. This research aimed to determine whether conventional packing resulted in constant mechanical impedance and to test alternative packing regimes. Perspex cylinders 300 mm tall with a 49 mm internal diameter were packed with moist sand to uniform and varying bulk densities to examine which type of packing gave the greatest uniformity of penetration resistance (PR) with depth. The cylinders packed to a constant bulk density (1.48, 1.55, and 1.6 Mg m-3) all had measured PR profiles which increased markedly with depth by approximately 1, 1.5 and 3 MPa, respectively, within the top 100 mm. Between 100–300 mm depth, these same cylinders showed reductions in PR of up to 1, 2 and 2 MPa respectively. These results show that sand packed to a constant bulk density with depth would not provide a uniform mechanical impedance to plant roots.
By packing sand to different bulk densities at different depths, we obtained packed cylinders that had much more uniform PR profiles (with average values of 0.25, 1.40 and 2.30 MPa). Below a depth of 50 mm, the coefficients of variation for replicate cylinders packed in this way were 12%, 5% and 18% for the 0.25, 1.40, and 2.30 MPa treatments respectively. For experiments with single plants, the lower PR values that were unavoidable near to the surface (< 50 mm) can be avoided by sowing seeds at the base of a funnel inserted into the cylinder. Treatments such as these can provide reproducible growth media, with adequate water/nutrient and aeration status for the study of plant response to uniform mechanical impedance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bengough A G 1991 The penetrometer in relation to mechanical resistance to root growth. InSoil Analysis: Physical Methods. Eds. K A Smith and C E Mullins. Dekker, New York.
Bengough A G, MacKenzie C J and Elangwe H E 1994 Biophysics of the growth of pea roots to changes in penetration resistance. Plant Soil 167, 135-141.
Bengough A G and Mullins C E 1990a The resistance experienced by roots growing in a pressurised cell. A reappraisal. Plant Soil 123, 73-82.
Bengough A G and Mullins C E 1990b Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J. Soil Sci. 41, 341-358.
Bengough A G, Mullins C E and Wilson G 1997 Estimating the frictional resistance to metal probes in relation to plant roots. Eur. J. Soil Sci. (In press).
Blaikie S J and Mason W K 1993 Restrictions to root growth limit the yield of shoots of irrigated white clover. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 44, 121-135.
Champoux M C, Wang G, Sarkarung S, Muckhill D J, O'Toole J C, Huang N and McCouch S R 1995 Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90, 969-981.
Cook A, Marriott C A, Seel W and Mullins C E 1996 Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenneL., Agrostis capillarisand Trifolium repensL. J. Exp. Bot. 47, 1075-1084.
Darwin C 1880 The Power of Movement in Plants. John Murray, London.
Dexter A R 1986 Model experiments on the behaviour of roots at the interface between a tilled seedbed and a compacted sub-soil. I. Effects of seed-bed aggregate size and sub-soil strength on wheat roots. Plant Soil 95, 123-133.
Goss M J 1977 Effects of mechanical impedance on root growth in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.). I. Effects on elongation and branching of seminal roots. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 96-111.
Jamieson J E, Morris R J and Mullins C E 1988 Effect of subsoiling on physical properties and crop growth on a sandy soil with a naturally compact subsoil. Proc. 11th. ISTRO Conference, Edinburgh l, 499-503.
Ley G J, Mullins C E and Lal R 1995 The potential restriction to root growth in structurally weak tropical soils. Soil Tillage Res. 33, 133-142.
Masle J 1992 Genetic variation in the effects of root impedance on growth and transpiration rates of wheat and barley. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 19, 109-125.
Masle J and Passioura J B 1987 The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14, 644-656.
Masle J, Farquhar G D and Gifford R M 1990 Growth and carbon economy of wheat seedlings as affected by soil resistance to penetration and ambient partial pressure of CO2. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 17, 465-487.
Materechera S A, Dexter A R and Alston A M1 1991 Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 135, 31-41.
Mullins C E, Cass A, MacLeod D A, Hall D J M and Blackwell P S 1992 Strength development during drying of cultivated, flood-irrigated hardsetting soil. II. Triangie soil, and comparisons with theoretical predictions. Soil Tillage Res. 25, 129-147.
Ray J D, Yu L, McCouch S R, Champoux M C, Wang G and Nguyen H T 1996 Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice (Oryza sativaL.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 627-636.
Richards B G and Greacen E L 1986 Mechanical stresses on an expanding cylindrical root analogue in granular media. Aust. J. Soil Res. 24, 393-404.
Sarquis J I, Wayne R J and Morgan P W 1991 Ethylene evolution from maize (Zea maysL.) seedling roots and shoots in response to mechanical impedance. Plant Physiol. 96, 1171-1177.
Tardieu F 1994 Growth and functioning of roots and of root systems subjected to soil compaction. Towards a system with multiple signalling? Soil Tillage Res. 30, 217-243.
Tsegaye T, Mullins C E and Diggle A J 1995a An experimental procedure for obtaining input parameters for the “ROOTMAP” root simulation program for peas (Pisum sativumL.) Plant Soil 172, 1-16.
Tsegaye T, Mullins C E and Diggle A J 1995b Modelling pea (Pisum sativum) root growth in drying soil. A comparison between observations andmodel predictions. New Phytol. 131, 179-189.
Tsegaye T and Mullins C E 1994 Effect of mechanical impedance on root growth and morphology of two varieties of pea (Pisum sativumL.). New Phytol. 126, 707-713.
Veen B W and Boone F R 1990 The influence of mechanical resistance and soil water on the growth of seminal roots of maize. Soil Tillage Res. 16, 219-226.
Warnaars B C and Eavis B 1972 Soil physic conditions affecting seedling root growth. II. Mechanical impedance, aeration and moisture availability as influenced by grain-size distribution and moisture content in silica sands. Plant Soil 36, 623-634.
Whiteley G M, Hewitt J S and Dexter A R 1982 The bucking of plant roots. Physiol. Plant. 54, 333-342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, A., Marriott, C., Seel, W. et al. Does the uniform packing of sand in a cylinder provide a uniform penetration resistance?. Plant and Soil 190, 279–287 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004216915006
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004216915006