Skip to main content
Log in

Tests of stability in attitude research

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some researchers suggest that panel data be used with simplex models in order to evaluate stability of opinions before drawing the conclusion that an attitude is detected. They have carried out studies showing that it is not always true that an attitude exists, mainly because the opinion is unstable. This paper proposes to continue this line of research, presenting both a new conceptualization of attitude stability and a way to evaluate it by using simplex models. The paper will show that when evaluating attitude stability, researchers' models must not only take into account the structure of the variances/covariances but also the structure of the means. The authors demonstrate that this new definition of change makes a difference in the conclusions with respect to the stability of opinions with respect to the role of women in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R.P. (1986). Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 16: 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, Y. & Anderson, T.W. (1990). Asymptotic chi-square test for a large class of factor analysis models, The Annals of Statistics 3: 1453–1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1989, 1991). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billict, J.G., Loosveldt, J. & Waterplats, L. (1986). Hct survey-interview onderzocht. Leuven: Department of Sociologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, H. & Saris, W.E. (1983). Using longitudinal data to estimate reliability. Public Opinion Q. 8: 409–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. (1970). Attitudes and nonattitudes: continuation of a dialogue, in E.R. Tufte, (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, Reading, M.A., Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Pijper, W.M. & Saris, W.E. (1986). The Formulation of Interviews Using the Program INTERV. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O.D. (1984). Notes on Special Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York: Russell, Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Reading: Mass. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Wiley & Sons

  • Grouters, G., Heyt, R., v.d., Leycke, M., Oprinsen, P., Pronk, C. (1988). De houding t.o.v. mannen en vrouwen. Inter Verslag: Faculty of Psychology, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: the Radex. In P.F. Lazarsfeld (ed.), Mathematical Thinking in Social Sciences. Chicago: Free University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. (1969). Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review 34: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, F.O.A., van Ijzendoorn, M.H. & Tavecchio, L.W.C. (1982). Validation of a questionnaire measuring attitudes toward females' social roles for a Dutch population. Psychological Reports 51: 491–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagodzinsky, W. & Kühnel, S.M. (1988). Estimation of reliability and stability in single indicator multiple-wave models, Sociological Methods & Research 15: 219–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1970). Estimation and testing of simplex models, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 23: 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modelling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. SSI. LEA.

  • Norušis, M.J. (1993). Statistical Package for Social Sciences: SPSS for Windows. Advanced Statistics. Release 6.0. SPSS Inc.

  • Saris, W.E. (1993). Attitude measurement: is there still hope. In Krebs, D. & Schmidt, P. (eds), New Directions in Attitude Measurement. Walter de Gruyter.

  • Saris, W.E. & B. Van den Putte (1988). True score of factor models: a secondary analysis of the ALLBUS-test-retest data. Sociological Methods and Research 17: 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W.E. & Hartman, H. (1990). Common factors can always be found but can they also be rejected? Quality & Quantity 24: 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A. (1993). Asymptotic robust inferences in multi-sample analysis of augmented-moment structures. In C.M. Cuadras & C.R. Rao (eds.), Multivariate Analysis: Future Directions 2. Elsevier Sciences Publishers, B.V.

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association 308–313.

  • Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1981). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.W. (1984). Nonattittudes: a review and evaluation. In C.F. Turner & E. Martin (eds), Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 2, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 215–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.T. & Helmereich, R. (1972). The attitudes towards women scale: an objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 2, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J.T. & Helmereich, R. & Stapp (1973). A short version of the attitudes towards women scale (AWS), Bull. Psychon. Soc. 2(4).

  • Wiley, D.E. & Wiley, J.A. (1970). The estimation of measurement error in panel data, American Sociological Review 35: 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batista-Foguet, J., Saris, W.E. Tests of stability in attitude research. Quality & Quantity 31, 269–285 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004202531485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004202531485

Keywords

Navigation