Skip to main content
Log in

Bertrand Price Competition in a Social Environment

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the dynamic behaviour of firms that locally interact through price competition in a social environment in an evolutionary game-theoretic model. These firms update their prices according to the behavioural rule ‘Win Cooperate, Lose Defect’ (WCLD), which is often observed in experimental economics. It can be regarded as a generalized Tit-for-Tat strategy. The model can explain the simultaneous emergence of collusive behaviour, price dispersion and occasional local price wars. Price wars only last for a short period of time after which the firms start to collude again.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Axelrod, R. (1987), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F. (1997), ‘Progress in Behavioral Game Theory’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, pp. 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. (1993), ‘Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination’, Econometrica, 61, pp. 1047–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. (2000), ‘Basins of Attraction, Long-run Stochastic Stability, and the Speed of Step-by-Step evolution’, Review of Economic Studies, 67, pp. 17–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermoliev, Yu., M.A. Keyzer, and V. Norkin (2000), ‘Global Convergence of the Stochastic Tâtonnement Process’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34, pp. 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I., E. Sansone, and A. Shaked (1999), ‘The Emergence of Kinship Behavior in Structured Populations of Unrelated Individuals’, International Journal of Game Theory, 28, pp. 447–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidlin, M. and A. Wentzell (1984), Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems, New York, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, V. and M.A. Keyzer (1997), The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harn, K. van and P.J. Holewijn (1991), Markov-ketens in diskrete tijd, Utrecht, Epsilon uitgaven, in Dutch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandori, M., G.J. Mailath, and R. Rob (1993), ‘Learning, Mutation and Long-run Equilibria in Games’, Econometrica, 61, pp. 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karandikar, R., D. Mookherjee, D. Ray, and F. Vega-Redondo (1998), ‘Evolving Aspirations and Cooperation’, Journal of Economic Theory, 80, pp. 292–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H.H. and J.W. Thibaut (1978), Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laan, G. van der, and A.F. Tieman (1998), ‘Evolutionary Game Theory and the Modelling of Economic Behavior’, De Economist, 146, pp. 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P.A.M. van (1997), ‘Persoonsverschillen in coöperatie, individualisme en competitie’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 52, pp. 101–110, in Dutch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P.A.M. van, E.M.N. de Bruin, W. Otten, and J.A. Joireman (1997), ‘Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orientations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, pp. 733–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D.M. and W.B.G. Liebrand (1995), ‘Individual Heuristics and the Dynamics of Cooperation in Large Groups’, Psychological Review, 102, pp. 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerman, T., J. Sonnemans, and A. Schram (1996), ‘Value Orientations, Expectations, and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods’, Economic Journal, 106, pp. 817–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomino, F., and F. Vega-Redondo (1999), ‘Convergence of Aspirations and ~Partial! Cooperation in the Prisoner' Dilemma’, International Journal of Game Theory, 28, pp. 465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. (1993), ‘Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics’, American Economic Review, 83(5), pp. 1281–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, L. (1997), Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York, Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1976), ‘From Substantive to Procedural Rationality’, in: S.J. Latsis (ed.), Methods and Appraisal in Economics, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.L., G.L. Suchanek, and A.W. Williams (1988), ‘Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets’, Econometrica, 56, pp. 1119–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J.W. and H.H. Kelley (1959), The Social Psychology of Groups, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

  • Vega-Redondo, F. (1996), Evolution, Games, and Economic Behavior, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1993), ‘The Evolution of Conventions’, Econometrica, 61, pp. 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1998), Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. and D.O. Foster (1991), ‘Cooperation in the Short and in the Long Run’, Games and Economic Behavior, 3, pp. 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tieman, A.F., van der Laan, G. & Houba, H. Bertrand Price Competition in a Social Environment. De Economist 149, 13–31 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004103630727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004103630727

Keywords

Navigation