Vocational Schools in Turkey: An Administrative and Organizational Analysis

Abstract

The data used in this paper were derived from a larger project which had the aim of critically evaluating the Turkish vocational education system on a number of different levels. This article examines the administrative and organisational practices in a selected group of secondary vocational schools in Turkey from the point of view of school administrators, teachers and industrial managers. The results indicate that the Turkish vocational education system is characterised by a centralised, top-down bureaucracy, which inhibits innovative capacity. The authors argue that a degree of decentralisation is necessary at various levels of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bolman, L. and Deal, T. 1990. Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Handy, C. 1990. The Age of Unreason. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobson, Stephen L. and Berne, Robert (eds.). 1993. Reforming Education: The Emerging Systemic Approach. New York, NY: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, Lung-Sheung. 1994. Vocational-Technical Education Reform in Germany, Netherlands, France and U.K. and Their Implication to Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Vocational Assocation, Dallas (TX), U.S.A.

  5. Leitzel, T. 1991. A Plan to Restructure Occupational Education to Meet Workforce Demands. Journal of Studies in Technical Careers 13(2): 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lundberg, David. 1996. Decentralization of Public Vocational Training in New Zealand and Two Australian States, Training Policy Study No. 9, ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. 371118.

  7. Miles, M. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olkun, Sinan. 1995. A Qualitative Assessment of School-to-Work Transition From the Perspectives of Graduates and Employers: The Case of Balgat industrial and Technical Lycee. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences.

  10. Patton, M. 1987. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reich, R.B. 1991. Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simsek, H. and Aytemiz, D. 1996. Anomaly-Based Change in Higher Education: The Case of a Large, Turkish Public University. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Division J), New York (NY), USA.

  13. Simsek, H. and Ammentorp, W.A. 1993. The Paradigm Shift of the 1990s and Restructuring Education Systems. Paper presented for the International Vocational Education and Training Association at the American Vocational Association annual meeting, Nashville (TN), U.S.A.

  14. Spradley, J.P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  15. State Planning Agency. 1995. 7th Five-Year Development Plan for 1995-1999. Ankara: State Planning Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wiggenhorn, W. 1990. Motorola U: When Training Becomes an Education. Harvard Business Review (July-August): 71–83.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simsek, H., Yildirim, A. Vocational Schools in Turkey: An Administrative and Organizational Analysis. International Review of Education 46, 327–342 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004026400023

Download citation

Keywords

  • Education System
  • Vocational Education
  • Large Project
  • School Administrator
  • Organisational Practice