Skip to main content
Log in

Notes and Communications – WTO and the Failure of Seattle

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bhagwati, J., D. Greenaway and A. Panagariya (1998), ‘Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy,’ Economic Journal 108, pp. 1128-1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford, D. and L. Fulponi (1999), ‘Emerging Public Concerns in Agriculture: Domestic Policies and International Trade Commitments,’ European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26, pp. 409-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2000), ‘Global Treaty adopted on Genetically Modified Organisms’, press release of the Convention on Biological Diversity, available at http://www.biodiv.org.

  • CEC (1998a), ‘CAP Reform Proposals. Impact Analyses,’ CAP reports, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1998b), ‘The CAP Reform-A Policy for the Future,’ COM (98) 158 final, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. and H. Kuwahara (1998), ‘The Impact of the Uruguay Round on Tariff and Non-tariff Barriers to Trade in the ‘Quad,’ World Economy, 21, pp. 207-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H. and P.C. Mavroidis (1999), ‘Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Developing Country Interests,’ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueth, B., E. Ligon, S. Wolf, and S. Wu (1999), ‘Incentive Instruments in Fruit and Vegetable Contracts: Input Control, Monitoring, Measuring, and Price Risk,’ Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, pp. 374-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyzer, M.A. and C.F.A. van Wesenbeeck (1999), ‘Trade Models of Imperfect Competition,’ in: G. Ranis and L.K. Raut (eds.), Trade, Growth and Development, Essays in Honor of Professor T.N. Srinivasan, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyzer, M.A. and M.D. Merbis (2000), ‘CAP Reform in Agenda 2000: An Opening Bid for the Millennium Round,’ Centre for World Food Studies, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leebron, D.W. (1996), ‘Lying Down with Procrustes: An Analysis of Harmonization Claims,’ in: J. N. Bhagwati and R.E. Hudec (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization. Prerequisites for Free Trade? Vol. 1, Economic analysis, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoo, A. (1999), ‘Financial Services and the World Trade Organization. Liberalization Commitments of the Developing and Transition Economies,’ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiklejohn, R. (1999), ‘An International Competition Policy. Do we Need it? Is it Feasible?,’ World Economy, 22, pp. 1233-1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M.K. (1989), ‘Vertical Integration: Determinants and Effects,’ in: R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume I. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J.S. and R.T. Rogers (eds.) (1998), The Industrialization of Agriculture: Vertical Coordination in the U.S. Food System, Aldershot, Brookfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Centre (1999), ‘Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in the WTO,’ T.R.A.D.E. Working paper 2, South Centre, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T.N. (1998), Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: From the GATT to the Uruguay Round and the Future. Boulder, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keyzer, M., Merbis, M. Notes and Communications – WTO and the Failure of Seattle. De Economist 148, 259–271 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004017313401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004017313401

Keywords

Navigation