, Volume 435, Issue 1–3, pp 167–175 | Cite as

Benthic macroinvertebrate communities of intermittent streams in the middle reaches of the Guadiana Basin (Portugal)



The Guadiana River has an irregular hydrological regime, with severe droughts and floods, but little is known about how aquatic fauna respond to these natural events. Macroinvertebrate data and environmental information were collected at seven sites from three tributaries in the middle reaches of the Guadiana River, approximately every 3 months from April 1995 to April 1997. Despite considerable annual variation in discharge (related to duration of flood and drought periods), the number of macroinvertebrates found was consistently high. Diptera represented the major proportion of the benthic fauna (73.2%) followed by Ephemeroptera (10.3%), Coleoptera (4.1%) and Trichoptera (3.1%). Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to evaluate the relationships between taxa density and habitat variables. Generally, Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera were found in the upstream sampling sites. Wider and deeper sites were associated with the presence of Diptera and were least diverse. High values for both the Shannon-Wiener diversity index and the average score per taxon were usually found at upstream sites where Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera predominated. The data suggest that macroinvertebrates have a great capacity to recover rapidly from severe drought periods, both in terms of taxonomic diversity and number of individuals.

macroinvertebrates intermittent streams environmental variables canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bendati, M. M. A., C. R. M. Maizonave, E. D. Olabarriaga & R. M. Rosado, 1998. Use of the benthic macroinvertebrate community as a pollution indicator in the Gravataí River (RS, Brazil). Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 2019–2023.Google Scholar
  2. Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake, 1990. The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. I. Multivariate analyses of physicochemical features. Freshwat. Biol. 24: 123–141.Google Scholar
  3. Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake, 1992a. The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. II. Comparisons of faunal composition between habitats, rivers and years. Freshwat. Biol. 27: 99–121.Google Scholar
  4. Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake, 1992b. The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. III. Temporal changes in faunal composition. Freshwat. Biol. 27: 123–138.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. V. & K. W. Brown, 1984. Distribution of insects within riffles of streams. Freshwat. Invert. Biol. 3: 2–11.Google Scholar
  6. Cortes, R. M. V., M. T. Ferreira & F. S. Godinho, 1998. Benthic community organization in a intermittent lotic system. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 1002–1007.Google Scholar
  7. Cowx, I. G., W. O. Young & J. M. Hellawell, 1984. The influence of drought on the fish and invertebrate populations of an upland stream in Wales. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 165–177.Google Scholar
  8. Cressa, C., 1998. Community composition and structure of macroinvertebrates of the river Camurí Grande, Venezuela. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 1008–1011.Google Scholar
  9. Crowder, L. B. & W. E. Cooper, 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802–1813.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, K. W., 1992. Invertebrates. In Calow, P. & G. E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 234–250.Google Scholar
  11. Delucchi, C. M., 1988. Comparison of community structure among streams with different temporal flow regimes. Can. J. Zool. 66: 579–586.Google Scholar
  12. De Shon, J. E., 1995. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, England: 217–243.Google Scholar
  13. Depiereux, E., E. Feytmans & J. C. Micha, 1983. Utilisation critique de l'analyse en composantes principales et du cluster analysis pour la description d'échantillons d'invertébrés benthiques en eau douce. Oikos 40: 81–94.Google Scholar
  14. Extence, C. A., 1981. The effect of drought on benthic invertebrate communities in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 83: 217–224.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, S. G., L. J. Gray, N. B. Grimm & D. E. Busch, 1982. Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 93–110.Google Scholar
  16. Gilinsky, E., 1984. The role of fish predation and spatial heterogeneity in determining benthic community structure. Ecology 65: 455–468.Google Scholar
  17. Godinho, F. N., M. T. Ferreira & R. V. Cortes, 1997. Composition and spatial organization of fish assemblages in the lower Guadiana Basin, southern Iberia. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 6: 134–143.Google Scholar
  18. Gower, A. M., G. Myers, M. Kent & M. E. Foulkes, 1994. Relationships between macroinvertebrate communities and environmental variables in metal-contaminated streams in south-west England. Freshwat. Biol. 32: 199–221.Google Scholar
  19. Iversen, T.M., P. Wiberg-Larsen, S. Birkholm Hansen & F. S. Hansen, 1978. The effect of partial and total drought on the macroinvertebrate communities of three small Danish streams. Hydrobiologia 60: 235–242.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, S. L. & C. C. Vaughn, 1995. A hierarchical study of macroinvertebrate recolonization of a disturbed patches along a longitudinal gradient in a prairie river. Freshwat. Biol. 34: 531–540.Google Scholar
  21. King, J. M., 1981. The distribution of invertebrate communities in a small African river. Hydrobiologia 83: 43–65.Google Scholar
  22. King, J. M., J. A. Day, P. R. Hurley. M. P. Henshall-Howard & B. R. Davies, 1988. Macroinvertebrates communities and environment in a Southern African mountain stream. Can. J. Fish aquat. Sci. 45: 2168–2181.Google Scholar
  23. Ludwig, J. A. & J. F. Reynolds, 1988. Statistical Ecology. A primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 337 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Metcalfe-Smith, J. L., 1996. Biological Water-quality Assessment of Rivers: Use of Macroinvertebrate Communities. In Petts, G. & P. Calow (eds), River Restoration. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 17–43.Google Scholar
  25. Ormerod, S. J., 1987. The influence of habitat and seasonal sampling regimes on the ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the catchment of the River Wye, Wales. Hydrobiologia 150: 143–151.Google Scholar
  26. Ormerod, S. J. & R. W. Edwards, 1987. The ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the catchment of the River Wye in relation to environmental factors. Freshwat. Biol. 17: 533–546.Google Scholar
  27. Pires, A. M., I. G. Cowx & M. M. Coelho, 1999. Seasonal changes in fish community structure of intermittent streams in the middle reaches of the Guadiana Basin (Portugal). J. Fish Biol. 54: 235–249.Google Scholar
  28. Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward, 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can. J. Fish aquat. Sci. 46: 1805–1817.Google Scholar
  29. Resh, V. H., 1995. Freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates and rapid assessment procedures for water quality monitoring in developing and newly industrialized countries. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, England, 167–177.Google Scholar
  30. Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz., H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace & R. C. Wissmar, 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 433–455.Google Scholar
  31. Richards, C., G. E. Host & J. W. Arthur, 1993. Identification of predominant environmental factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwat. Biol. 29: 285–294.Google Scholar
  32. Sousa, W. P., 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann. Review Ecol. Syst. 15: 353–391.Google Scholar
  33. Scrimgeour, G. J. & M. J. Winterbourn, 1989. Effects of floods on epilithon and benthic macroinvertebrate populations in an unstable New Zealand river. Hydrobiologia 171: 33–44.Google Scholar
  34. Tate, C. M. & J. S. Heiny, 1995. The ordination of benthic invertebrate communities in the South Platte River Basin in relation to environmental factors. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 439–454.Google Scholar
  35. Tátrai, I., E. H. Lammens, A. W. Breukelaar & J. G. P. Klein Breteler, 1994. The impact of mature cyprinid fish on the composition and biomass of benthic macroinvertebrates. Arch. Hydrobiol. 131: 309–320.Google Scholar
  36. ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector method for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.Google Scholar
  37. ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987-1992. CANOCO-a FORTRAN program for Canonical Community Ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  38. ter Braak, C. J. F. & J. Wiertz, 1994. On the statistical analysis of vegetation change: a wetland affected by water extraction and soil acidification. J. Veget. Science 5: 361–372.Google Scholar
  39. ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 57: 255–289.Google Scholar
  40. Townsend, C. R., A. G. Hildrew & J. Francis, 1983. Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of physicochemical factors. Freshwat. Biol. 13: 521–544.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, D. D. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1976. The recolonization mechanisms of stream benthos. Oikos 27: 265–272.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, D. D. & M. R. Smith, 1996. Colonization dynamics of river benthos in response to local changes in bed characteristics. Freshwat. Biol. 36: 237–248.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.Google Scholar
  44. Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, U.S.A.: 718 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Biologia Ambiental-Departamento de Zoologia e AntropologiaFaculdade de Ciências de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Hull International Fisheries InstituteUniversity of HullHullU.K.
  3. 3.Centro de Biologia Ambiental-Departamento de Zoologia e AntropologiaFaculdade de Ciências de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations