Skip to main content
Log in

In Search of Verae Causae: The Keynes-Tinbergen Debate Revisited

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A popular subject in discussion on Keynes and statistical inference is the Keynes-Tinbergen debate, which appeared in The Economic Journal in the late 1930s and early 1940s. The subject re-emerged in the literature in the second half of the 1970s and continued into the 1990s. The Keynes-Tinbergen debate is considered to be the starting point of a discussion on a host of technical econometric pitfalls and methodological difficulties attached to the statistical testing of economic theory. Although the discussion has focussed on the question to which degree the debate has had bearings on the further development of econometrics and applied economics, this paper highlights the issue of causal explanation in business cycle theory. The implications of the Keynes-Tinbergen debate may be extended to a discussion on the theoretical claims of originality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bateman, B.W. (1988), 'The Elusive Logical Relation: An Essay on Change and Continuity in Keynes's Thought,' in: D.E. Moggridge (ed.), Perspectives in the History of Economic Thought, IV, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, B.W. (1990), 'Keynes, Induction and Econometrics,' History of Political Economy, 22.

  • Carabelli, A.M. (1988), On Keynes's Method, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberler, G. (1937), Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements, Geneva, League of Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R.F. (1936), The Trade Cycle, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. (1980), 'Econometrics-Alchemy or science,' Economica, 47, pp. 387-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F. and M.S. Morgan (eds.) (1995), The Foundations of Econometric Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1921), A Treatise on Probability, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1939), 'Professor Tinbergen's Method,' Economic Journal, 49, pp. 558-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1940), 'Comment,' Economic Journal, 50, pp. 154-556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1973), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, edited by D.E. Moggridge, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klant, J.J. (1979), 'De methodologie van J.M. Keynes,' in: J.J. Klant, W. Driehuis, H.J. Bierens, and A.J. Butter (eds.), Samenleving en Onderzoek, Leiden, Stenfert Kroese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1985), 'Keynes, Prediction and Econometrics,' in: T. Lawson and H. Pesaran (eds.), Keynes's Economics, Armonk, M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, R. (1998), '”The Ghosts I Called I Can't Get Rid of Now”: The Keynes-Tinbergen-Friedman-Phillips Critique of Keynesian Macroeconometrics,' History of Political Economy, 30, pp. 51-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louça, F. (1999), 'The Econometric Challenge to Keynes: Arguments and Contradictions in the Early Debates about a Late Issue,' European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 6, pp. 404-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1983), 'Understanding Business Cycles,' in: Studies in Business-Cycle Theory, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.S. (1990), The History of Econometric Ideas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patinkin, D. (1976), 'Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period,' Econometrica, 44, pp. 1091-1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, M. (1989), Keynes, Investment Theory and the Economic Slowdown, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, H. and R. Smith (1985), 'Keynes on Econometrics,' in: T. Lawson and H. Pesaran (eds.), Keynes's Economics, Armonk, M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. (1978), 'Keynes, Political Arithmatic and Econometrics,' Proceedings of the British Academy, 64, pp. 55-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1963), 'A Reconsideration of the Keynes-Tinbergen Discussion on Econometric Techniques,' De Economist, 111, pp. 241-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1934), 'De vraag naar korte kredieten en de rentestand,' De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur, 3, pp. 18-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1938), 'Statistical Evidence on the Accelerator Principle,' Economica, 5, pp. 164-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1939a), Statistical Testing of Business-cycle Theories: A Method and its Application to Investment Activity, Geneva, League of Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1939b), Statistical Testing of Business-cycle Theories: Business Cycles in the United States of America 1919-1932, Geneva, League of Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1942), Economische Bewegingsleer, Amsterdam, Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jolink, A. In Search of Verae Causae: The Keynes-Tinbergen Debate Revisited. De Economist 148, 1–17 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003980828417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003980828417

Keywords

Navigation