Abstract
In this paper we develop an equilibrium business-cycle model for an economy with both clean and dirty (polluting) plants. We conclude that the best time to implement cleaner production technologies is during a slowdown of the economy. Due to external effects and market failures the timing of pollution abatement investments is not expected to be optimal in the real world. We test the optimality of the timing of those investments with data for Germany, the Netherlands, and the USA. It appears that for more than 25 per cent of the sectors pollution abatement investments show significant counter-cyclical behaviour, while in 10 per cent of the sectors these investments are pro-cyclical.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bean, C.R. (1990), 'Endogenous Growth and the Procyclical Behaviour of Productivity,' European Economic Review, 34, pp. 355-363.
Bouman, M. (1995), Pollution Abatement Capital Expenditures in Germany, the Netherlands, France, and the USA, unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Caballero, R.J. (1992), 'A Fallacy of Composition,' American Economic Review, 52, pp. 1279-1292.
Davis, S.J. and J. Haltiwanger (1990), 'Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Micro Economic Evidence and Macro Economic Implications,' NBER Macro Economic Annual, 5, pp. 123-168.
King, R.G. and S.T. Rebelo (1993), 'Low Frequency Filtering and the Real Business Cycles,' Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 17, pp. 207-231.
OECD (1993), 'Pollution Abatement and Control Expenditure in OECD Countries,' Environmental Monographs, 75, Paris.
Saint-Paul, G. (1993), 'Productivity Growth and the Structure of the Business Cycle,' European Economic Review, pp. 861-883.
Sargent, T. (1987), Dynamic Macro Economic Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Stokey, N., R.E. Lucas, and E.C. Prescott (1989), Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouman, M., Gautier, P. & Hofkes, M. Do Firms Time Their Pollution Abatement Investments Optimally?. De Economist 148, 71–86 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003972811231
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003972811231