Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 421, Issue 1, pp 1–24 | Cite as

Freshwater bryozoans (Bryozoa) of Norway: Distribution and ecology of Cristatella mucedo and Paludicella articulata

  • Karen Anna Økland
  • Jan Økland
Article

Abstract

Bryozoans were investigated during field studies of 601 lakes and other surface water bodies throughout Norway from 1960 to 1978. Material from other sources was also included in the study. Twelve environmental factors were registered. The frequency of occurrence of the two species Cristatella mucedo and Paludicella articulata in lakes was evaluated in relation to 11 environmental variables. Statistically significant deviations from the frequencies expected on the basis of random distribution were described using the categories preference, avoidance, and absence. Cristatella mucedo occurred at 227 localities throughout Norway. Five sites were north of 70°, up to 71° 03′. N (global maximum). Maximum elevation above sea level was 1116 m (maximum for Northern Europe). Paludicella articulataoccurred at 239 localities, 20 of which were north of 70°, up to 71° 09′ N (global maximum). Maximum elevation above sea level was 1397 m (maximum for Northern Europe). Both species tolerated a cold climate, especially P. articulata, and they occurred in a wide range of environments. Cristatella mucedo preferred lakes of medium elevation above sea level, high water temperature, small wave action, medium or high levels of calcium, medium level of magnesium, slightly acidic water and medium water colour. C. mucedowas indifferent to the trophic level of the lakes and avoided lakes of high elevation, low water temperature, heavy wave action, low concentrations of calcium and magnesium, the most acidic lakes (absent below pH 5.4) and lakes of low water colour. Paludicella articulatapreferred lakes of medium water temperature, oligotrophic conditions with poor macrovegetation and stony shores, some wave action, medium levels of calcium and magnesium and high pH (alkaline waters). P. articulatawas indifferent to elevation above sea level but avoided lakes of low water temperature, eutrophic conditions with rich aquatic vegetation and soft sediment, small wave action, low concentrations of calcium and magnesium, acid lakes (absent at pH below 5.9), and strongly coloured water. Since the species are sensitive to acid water (absent below pH 5.4 and 5.9), acidification of water courses has probably restricted the distribution of both species in some areas of Norway. The species were positively associated with each other, occurring more frequently in the same lake than expected on the basis of random distribution.

biogeography Bryozoa Cristatella mucedo ecology freshwater Norway Paludicella articulata 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrikossoff, G., 1932. Die Bryozoen. II. Teil. Die Süsswasserbryozoen des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna arct. 6: 384-388.Google Scholar
  2. Ambrogi, A. O. & J.-L. d'Hondt, 1981. Distribution of bryozoans in brackish waters of Italy. In Larwood, G. P. & C. Nielsen (eds), Recent and Fossil Bryozoa. 5th Int. Conf. on Bryozoa, Durham 1980. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg: 191-198.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G., 1938. Süsswasser-Bryozoen in Mecklenburg. Arch. Ver. Fr. Naturges. Mecklenburg 13: 87-97.Google Scholar
  4. Borg, F., 1941. Ñber die Süsswasserbryozoen Schwedens. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 20: 479-496.Google Scholar
  5. Bø rset, R., 1969. —To nye norske funn av mosdyret Plumatella fungosa (Pall.). Fauna, Oslo 22: 221-222.Google Scholar
  6. Brittain, J. E. & B. Nagell, 1981. Overwintering at low oxygen concentrations in the mayfly Leptophlebia vespertina. Oikos 36: 45-50.Google Scholar
  7. Bushnell, J. H., 1966. Environmental relations of Michigan Ectoprocta, and dynamics of natural populations of Plumatella repens. Ecol. Monogr. 36: 95-123.Google Scholar
  8. Bushnell, J. H., 1973. The freshwater Ectoprocta: A zoogeographical discussion. In Larwood, G. P. (ed.), Living and Fossil Bryozoa. Recent Advances in Research. Academic Press, London, N.Y.: 503-521.Google Scholar
  9. Bushnell, J. H., 1974. Bryozoans (Ectoprocta). In Hart, C. W. & S. L. H. Fuller (eds), Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, N.Y., San Francisco, London: 157-194.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, K., 1943. —Ørret og ø rretvand. Studier og forsø k. J.W. Cappelen Forlag, Oslo: 182 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Fredskild, B. & U. Røen, 1982. Macrofossils in an interglacial peat deposit at Kap Kø benhavn, North Greenland. Boreas 11: 181-185.Google Scholar
  12. Geimer, G. & J. A. Massard, 1986. Les bryozoaires du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg et des régions limitrophes. Trav. sci. Mus. hist. nat. Luxembourg No 7: 1-188.Google Scholar
  13. Heding, S. G., 1938. Freshwater Bryozoa. Zool. Iceland 4, 66 b: 1-3.Google Scholar
  14. Hessen, D. O., 1985. The relation between bacterial carbon and dissolved humic compounds in oligotrophic lakes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 31: 215-223.Google Scholar
  15. Hoc, S., 1963. Die Moostiere (Bryozoa) der deutschen Süss-, Brackund Küstengewässer. Die neue Brehm-Bücherei, A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt: 62 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Hosmer, D. W. & S. Lemeshow, 1989. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York: XIII, 307 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Kaminski, M., 1984a. Contributions to the knowledge of freshwater Bryozoa of the Mazurian Lake District. Fragmenta Faunistica (Warsaw): 28(4): 73-78.Google Scholar
  18. Kaminski, M., 1984b. Food composition of three bryozoan species (Bryozoa, Phylactolaemata) in a mesotrophic lake. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 31: 45-53.Google Scholar
  19. Kgl. Norske Vidensk. Selsk., 1928. Årsberetning 1928: 40.Google Scholar
  20. Kraepelin, K., 1887. Die deutschen Süsswasser-Bryozoen. Eine Monographie. I. Anatomisch-systematischer Teil. Abh. Naturw., Hamburg 10(9): 1-168.Google Scholar
  21. Kuiper, J. G. J., K. A. Økland, J. Knudsen, L. Koli, T. von Proschwitz & I. Valovirta, 1989. Geographical distribution of the small mussels (Sphaeriidae) in North Europe (Denmark, Faroes, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). Ann. zool. fenn. 26: 73-101.Google Scholar
  22. Lacourt, A. W., 1968. A monograph of the freshwater Bryozoa-Phylactolaemata. Zool. Verh., Leiden 93: 1-159.Google Scholar
  23. Larsen, B. M., R. Hartvigsen, K. A. Økland & J. Økland, 1998. Utbredelse av andemusling Anodonta anatina og flat dammusling Pseudanodonta complanata i Norge: en forelø pig oversikt. NINA Oppdragsmelding 521: 1-32.Google Scholar
  24. Liebmann, H., 1960. Handbuch der Frischwasser-und Abwasser-Biologie. Biologie des Trinkwassers, Badewassers, Fischwassers, Vorfluters und Abwassers, 2. R. Oldenbourg, München: 1149 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Marcus, E., 1940. —Mosdyr (Bryozoa eller Polyzoa). Danmarks Fauna 46: 1-401.Google Scholar
  26. Massard, J. A. & G. Geimer, 1991. Note sur les Bryozoaires d'eau douce trouvés en diverses stations luxembourgeoises et belges, avec des considérations sur la bryozoofauna de la Sû re et des remarques concernant les statoblastes de Hyalinella punctata (Hancock, 1850). Bull. Soc. nat. luxemb. 92: 131-148.Google Scholar
  27. Mauch. E., 1991. Paludicella articulata (Ehrenberg 1831) (Bryozoa) in der oberen Donau bei Donauwörth (Schwaben, Bayern). Lauterbornia 8: 79-80.Google Scholar
  28. Mundy, S. P., 1980. A key to the British and European freshwater bryozoans. Freshwat. biol. Ass., Scient. Publ. 41: 1-32.Google Scholar
  29. Nagell, B. & J. E. Brittain, 1977. Winter anoxia-a general feature of ponds in cold temperate regions. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 62: 821-824.Google Scholar
  30. Okamura, B., 1994. Variation in local populations of the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo. In Hayward, P.J., J.S. Ryland & P.D. Taylor (eds), Biology and Palaeobiology of Bryozoans. Proc. 9th Int. Bryozool. Conf., Swansea 1992: 145-149.Google Scholar
  31. Økland, F., 1928. Land-und Süsswasserfauna von Nowaja Semlja. Versuch einer tiergeographischen Monographie eines arktischen Gebiets. Rep. scient. Results norw. Exped. Novaya Zemlya 1921, 42: 1-125.Google Scholar
  32. Økland, J., 1961. —Om Østensjø vann i Oslo og faunaen der. Fauna, Oslo 14: 121-143.Google Scholar
  33. Økland, J., 1964. The eutrophic lake Borrevann (Norway)-an ecological study on shore and bottom fauna with special reference to gastropods, including a hydrographic survey. Folia limnol. scand. 13: 1-337.Google Scholar
  34. Økland, J., 1969a. —Om mosdyr i ferskvann og en ny art for Norge. Fauna, Oslo 22: 215-221.Google Scholar
  35. Økland, J., 1969b. Distribution and ecology of the fresh-water snails (Gastropoda) of Norway. Malacologia 9: 143-151.Google Scholar
  36. Økland, J., 1979. Distribution of environmental factors and freshwater snails (Gastropoda) in Norway: use of European Invertebrate Survey principles. Malacologia 18: 211-222.Google Scholar
  37. Økland, J., 1990. Lakes and snails. Environment and Gastropoda in 1,500 Norwegian lakes, ponds and rivers. Universal Book Services/Dr W. Backhuys, Oegstgeest, The Netherlands: 516 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Økland, J. & K. A. Økland, 1986. The effects of acid deposition on benthic animals in lakes and streams. Experientia 42: 471-486.Google Scholar
  39. Økland, J. & K. A. Økland, 1993. —Database for bioindikatorer i ferskvann-et forprosjekt. Naturens Tå legrenser, Miljø verndepartementet, Fagrapport 39: 1-42 (Rapp. Lab. Ferskv.ø kol. Innlandsfiske, Oslo 144).Google Scholar
  40. Økland, K. A., 1979. Localities with Asellus aquaticus (L.) and Gammarus lacustris G.O.Sars in Norway, and a revised system of faunistic regions. SNSF-project, TN 49/79. Oslo-Ås, Norway: 64 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Økland, K. A., 1980. Mussels and crustaceans: studies of 1,000 lakes in Norway. In Drablø s, D. & A. Tollan (eds), Ecological Impact of Acid Precipitation. Proc. Int. Conf., Sandefjord, Norway, March 11-14, 1980. SNSF-project, Oslo-Ås, Norway: 324-325.Google Scholar
  42. Økland, K. A. & J. G. J. Kuiper, 1990. —Små muslinger i norske vann og vassdrag-lokaliteter og miljø forhold. Rapp. Lab. Ferskv.ø kol. Innlandsfiske, Oslo, 123: 1-64.Google Scholar
  43. Økland, K. A. & J. Økland, 1985. Factor interaction influencing the distribution of the freshwater 'shrimp' Gammarus. Oecologia (Berl.) 66: 364-367.Google Scholar
  44. Økland, K. A. & J. Økland, 1989. The amphiatlantic freshwater sponge Anheteromeyenia ryderi (Porifera: Spongillidae): taxonomic-geographic implications of records from Norway. Hydrobiologia 171: 177-188.Google Scholar
  45. Økland, K. A. & J. Økland, 1991. —En ferskvannssvamp (Anheteromeyenia ryderi) med amfiatlantisk utbredelse funnet i Norge. Fauna, Oslo 44: 220-226.Google Scholar
  46. Økland, K. A. & J. Økland, 1996a. Freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) of Norway: distribution and ecology. Hydrobiologia 330: 1-30.Google Scholar
  47. Økland, K. A. & J. Økland, 1996b. —Bryozoa-Mosdyr. In Aagaard, K. & D. Dolmen (eds), Limnofauna Norvegica. Katalog over Norsk Ferskvannsfauna. Tapir Forlag, Trondheim: 87-88.Google Scholar
  48. Økland, K. A. & J. Økland, 1996c. —Landsoversikt over funn av ferskvannssvamper (Porifera: Spongillidae) i Norge-en database. Rapp. Lab. Ferskv.ø kol. Innlandsfiske, Oslo 159: 1-25.Google Scholar
  49. Ormerod, K., 1974. —Problemer med slam og dyr i distribusjonsnett for vann. Norw. Inst. Wat. Res. NIVA, Temarapport 2: 1-57.Google Scholar
  50. Pécsi, T. & B. Erdelics, 1970. Paludicella articulata Ehrenberg (Bryozoa, Ectoprocta) and Urnatella gracilis Leidy (Kamptozoa), new for the Hungarian reach of the Danube. Arch Hydrobiol./Suppl. 36: 293-298.Google Scholar
  51. Pennak, R.W., 1989. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States. Protozoa to Mollusca. 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. N.Y.: 628 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Raddum, G. G., 1970. —Mosdyret, Plumatella fungosa (Pallas), ø kologi og taksonomi. Fauna, Oslo 23: 122-131.Google Scholar
  53. Raddum, G. G., 1971. —Litt om ferskvannsmosdyr i Vest-Norge. Fauna, Oslo 24: 84-95.Google Scholar
  54. Raddum, G. G., 1981. —Livsstrategi hos mosdyret Plumatella repens. (English summary: Life strategy of Plumatella repens (Bryozoa)). Fauna, Oslo 34: 162-166.Google Scholar
  55. Raddum, G. G. & T. M. Johnsen, 1983. Growth and feeding of Fredericella sultana (bryozoa) in the outlet of a humic acid lake. Hydrobiologia 101: 115-120.Google Scholar
  56. Reynolds, J. D., 1976. Occurrence of the fresh-water bryozoan Cristatella mucedo Cuvier, in British Columbia. Syesis 9: 365-366.Google Scholar
  57. Ricciardi, A. & H. M. Reiswig, 1994. Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the freshwater bryozoans (Ectoprocta) of eastern Canada. Can. J. Zool. 72: 339-359.Google Scholar
  58. Richardson, J. S. & R. J. Mackay, 1991. Lake outlets and the distribution of filter feeders: an assessment of hypotheses. Oikos 62: 370-380.Google Scholar
  59. Salonen, K. & T. Hammar, 1986. On the importance of dissolved organic matter in the nutrition of zooplankton in some lake waters. Oecologia (Berl.) 68: 246-253.Google Scholar
  60. Scott, D., 1992. Lake outlets: A habitat worth preserving. Freshwat. Forum 2: 230-231.Google Scholar
  61. Sládecek, V., 1980. Indicator value of freshwater Bryozoa. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 8: 273-276.Google Scholar
  62. Smyth, T., 1994. The distribution of freshwater Bryozoa in Ireland. Bull. irish biogeogr. Soc. 17: 9-22.Google Scholar
  63. Smyth, T. & J. D. Reynolds, 1995. Survival ability of statoblasts of freshwater Bryozoa found in Renvyle Lough, County Galway. Proc. r. irish Acad. 95B: 65-68.Google Scholar
  64. Solem, J. O., T. Solem, K. Aagaard & O. Hanssen, 1997. Colonization and evolution of lakes on the central Norwegian coast following deglaciation and land uplift 9500-7800 years B.P. J. Palaeolimnol. 18: 269-281.Google Scholar
  65. Sø rensen, J. P., H. H. Riber & A. Kowalczewski, 1986. Soluble reactive phosphorus release from bryozoan dominated periphyton. Hydrobiologia 132: 145-148.Google Scholar
  66. Taticchi, M. I., 1989. Some observations on the feeding of freshwater Bryozoa in nature (Lake Trasimeno-Perugia, Italy). Riv. Idrobiol. 28: 219-229.Google Scholar
  67. Troyer-Mildner, J. & P. Mildner, 1992. Zur Kenntnis der Bryozoenfauna Kärntens (Tentaculata: Ectoprocta). Carinthia II 182./102: 579-589.Google Scholar
  68. Uotila, L. & J. Jokela, 1995. Variation in reproductive characteristics of colonies of the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo. Freshwat. Biol. 34: 513-522.Google Scholar
  69. Velikonja, M., 1992. A contribution to the knowledge of the freshwater Bryozoa of Slovenia. Biol. Vestn. 40(2) 1992 (1995): 83-88.Google Scholar
  70. Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1937. Ferskvandsfaunaen biologisk belyst. Invertebrata. 1. Bind. Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag, Kø benhavn: 414 pp.Google Scholar
  71. Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1907. On the occurrence of Fredericella sultana Blumenb. and Paludicella Ehrenbergii van Bened. in Greenland. Medd. Grø nland 34: 63-75.Google Scholar
  72. Wiebach, F., 1960. Bryozoa. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas 1 (8): 1-76.Google Scholar
  73. Wiebach, F. & J.-L. d'Hondt, 1978. Bryozoa. In Illies, J. (ed.), Limnofauna Europaea. 2nd edn. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York; Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., Amsterdam: 492-493.Google Scholar
  74. Wood, T. S., 1991. Bryozoans. In Thorp, J. H. & A. P. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California: 481-499.Google Scholar
  75. Wotton, R. S., 1988. Very high secondary production at a lake outlet. Freshwat. Biol. 20: 341-346.Google Scholar
  76. Wotton, R. S., 1992. Animals that exploit lake outlets. Freshwat. Forum 2: 62-76.Google Scholar
  77. Wotton, R. S., B. Malmqvist & K. Ashelford, 1995. The retention of particles intercepted by a dense aggregation of lake-outlet suspension feeders. Hydrobiologia 306: 125-129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Anna Økland
    • 1
  • Jan Økland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations