Abstract
The plesiomorphic mode of crustacean development is widely accepted to be via a larva called the nauplius. Extant taxa like the Cephalocarida, Branchiopoda, Ostracoda, Mystacocarida, Copepoda, Cirripedia, Ascothoracida, Facetotecta, Euphausiacea and Penaeidea hatch from an egg as a free-living nauplius. Other crustaceans show an embryonic phase of development suggestive of a naupliar organization. Several features of the nauplius larva have been proposed as diagnostic characters for the Crustacea: a median (nauplius) eye; at least three pairs of head appendages (antennules, antennae, mandibles); a posteriorly directed fold (the labrum) extending over the mouth and a cephalic (nauplius) shield. The relationship between trilobite protaspis with at least four appendages and the crustacean nauplius remains unclear, but reports of a copepod orthonauplius with four appendages are rejected. Swimming is suggested to represent the underived mode of locomotion for the crustacean nauplius, and that naupliar swimming directly results in naupliar feeding which also is underived.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. T., 1973. Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelida and Arthropods. Pergamon, Oxford: 1–495.
Ax, P., 1987. Systematik in der Biologie. UTB, G. Fischer Verlag Stuttgart: 1–181.
Björnberg, T. K. S., 1986. The rejected nauplius: a commentary. Syllogeus 58: 232–236.
Boxshall, G. A., 1985. The comparative anatomy of two copepods, a predatory calanoid and a particle feeding mormonilloid. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. (B) 311: 303–377.
Calman, W. T., 1909. Crustacea. A Treatise on Zoology, Part VII.: 1–346.
Dahl, E., 1976. Structural plans as functional models exemplified by the Crustacea Malacostraca. Zool. Scr. 5: 163–166.
Dahms, H.-U., 1990. Naupliar development of Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) and its significance for phylogenetic systematics. Microfauna Marina 6: 169–272. Dahms, H.-U., 1991. Usefulness of postembryonic characters for phylogenetic reconstruction in Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda). Bull. Plankton Soc. Jap, Spec. Vol.: 87–104.
Dahms, H.-U. & C. H. Fernando, 1994. Redescription of female Macrocyclops fuscus (Jurine, 1820) (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) from Ontario with a description of naupliar stages. J. Plankton Res. 16: 9–21.
Dahms, H.-U., S. Lorenzen & H. K. Schminke, 1991. Phylogenetic relationships within the taxon Tisbe (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) as evidenced by naupliar characters. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-forsch. 29: 450–465.
Delamare-Debouteville, C., 1954. III. Le developpement postembryonaire des Mystacocarides. Arch. Zool. exp. gen. (Paris) 91: 25–34.
Fryer, G., 1985. Structure and habits of living branchiopod crustaceans and their bearing on the interpretation of fossil forms. Trans. r. Soc. Edinb. 76: 103–113.
Fryer, G., 1992. The origin of the Crustacea. Acta zool. (Stockholm) 73(5): 273–286.
Fortey, R. A. & S. F. Morris, 1978. Discovery of nauplius-like trilobite larvae. Palaeontology 21: 823–833.
Garstang, W. & R. Gurney, 1938. The descent of Crustacea from Trilobites and their larval relations. Evolution-essays presented. Oxford: 271–286.
Gurney, R., 1930. The larval stages of the copepod Longipedia. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 16: 461–474.
Gurney, R., 1942. Larvae of Decapod Crustacea. Reprint H. R. Engelmann, Weinheim 1942: 1–306.
Henning, W., 1965. Phylogenetic Systematics. Ann. Rev. Ent. 10: 97–116.
Huys, R., 1995. A new genus of Canuellidae (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) associated with Atlantic bathyal sea urchins. Zool. Scr, 24: 225–243.
Huys, R. & R. Böttger-Schnack, 1994. Taxonomy, biology and phylogeny of Miracidae (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). Sarsia 79: 207–283.
Ito, T. & M. J. Grygier, 1990. Description and complete larval development of a new species of Baccalaureus (Crustacea: Ascothoracida) parasitic on a zoanthid from Tanabe Bay, Honshu, Japan. Zool. Sci. 9: 485–515.
Izawa, K., 1987. Studies on the phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic features in the poecilostome nauplii (Copepoda: Cyclopoida). Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 32: 151–217.
Jablonski, D., 1986. Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bull. mar. Sci. 39: 565–587.
Jägersten, G., 1972. Evolution of metazoan life cycle. Academic Press-London: 1–282.
Kesling, R. V., 1951. The morphology of ostracod molt stages. Ill. Biol. Monogr. 21 (1–3): 1–126.
Lang, K., 1946. A contribution to the question of the mouthparts of the Copepoda. Ark. Zool. 38A (5): 1–24.
Lang, K., 1948. Monographie der Harpacticiden I und II. Reprint Otto Koeltz Science Publ., Koenigstein, West-Germany: 1–1682.
Lauterbach, K.-E., 1980. Schlüsselereignisse in der Evolution des Grundplans der Arachnata (Arthropoda). Abh. Naturw. Ver. Hamburg (N.F.) 23: 163–327.
Matthews, J. B. L., 1964. On the biology of some bottom-living copepods (Aetideidae and Phaennidae) from Western Norway. Sarsia 16: 1–46.
Nielsen, C., 1994. Larval and adult characters in animal phylogeny. Am. Zool. 34: 492–501.
Rieger, R. M., 1994. The biphase life cycle-a central theme of metazoan evolution. Am. Zool. 34: 484–491.
Sanders, H. L., 1963. The Cephalocarida, functional morphology, larval development, comparative external anatomy. Mem. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 15: 1–80.
Scholtz, G., 1993. Teloblasts in decapod embryos: an embryonic character reveals the monophyletic origin of freshwater cray-fishes (Crustacea, Decapoda). Zool. Anz. 230: 45–54.
Schram, T. A., 1970. On the enigmatical larva nauplius y type I Hansen. Sarsia 45: 53–68.
Slack, J. M. W., P. W. H. Holland & C. F. Graham, 1993. The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature 361: 490–492.
Snodgrass, R. E., 1956. Crustacean metamorphoses. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 131 (10): 1–73.
Vincx, M. & C. Heip, 1979. Larval development and biology of Canuella perplexa T. and A. Scott, 1893 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Cah. Biol. mar. 20: 281–299.
Walossek, D., 1993. The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils Strata 32: 1–202.
Walossek, D. & K. J. Müller, 1990. Upper Cambrian stem-lineage crustaceans and their bearing upon the monophyletic origin of Crustacea and the position of Agnostus. Lethaia 23: 409–427.
Walossek, D. & K. J. Müller, 1997. Cambrian 'Orsten'-type arthropods and the phylogeny of Crustacea. In Fortey R. A. & R.H. Thomas (eds), Arthropod Relationships. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 55. Chapman & Hall, London: 139–153.
Walossek, D. & K. J. Müller, 1998. Early arthropod phylogeny in the light of the Cambrian 'Orsten' fossils. In Edgecombe, G. D. (ed.), Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York: 185–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dahms, HU. Phylogenetic implications of the Crustacean nauplius. Hydrobiologia 417, 91–99 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003886818724
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003886818724