Skip to main content
Log in

Methodologies for surveying plant communities in artificial channels

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gathering of quantitative information on aquatic macrophyte communities in artificial drainage and navigation channels presents a number of methodological and analytical problems. These include: subjectivity of plant abundance estimation, the conflict between standardisation and adaptation of methods to specific purposes, and the concepts of randomness and homogeneity in linear surveying. As a result, much of the currently available information is highly subjective and difficult to use in any comparative way, either temporally or spatially. More standardised procedures should be developed which minimise these shortcomings and permit later re-use of data in comparative studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, M. R. & M. A. Palmer, 1985. A standard method for the survey of ditch vegetation. Chief Scientist's Team Note 37, Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, I. K. & J. Grace, 1983. Primary production in wetlands and mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor. Gore, A. J. P. (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, J. E., J. T. Nichols, K. Engel, & K. M. Eskridge, 1994. Efficiency of different quadrat sizes and shapes for sampling standing crop. J. Range Mgmt 47: 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, W. R. & C. J. Wheeler, 1992. Estimating plant biomass: a review of techniques. Aust. J. Ecol. 17: 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECN (in press) Monitoring aquatic macrophytes within the ECN program, Environmental Change Network. A project based at The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merlewood England.

  • Hegarty, C. A. & A. Cooper, 1994. Regional variation of hedge structure and composition in Northern Ireland in relation to management. Proc. r. Irish Acad. 94B: 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. Ter Braak & O. F. R. Van Tongeren, (eds), 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, S., 1987. A Botanical Survey of The Leven Canal: a report produced for the Nature Conservancy Council, North Eastern Region, Peterborough, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, K. A. & J. H. H. Loony, 1985. Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. 3rd edn. Edward Arnold. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. & J. F. Reynolds, 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75: 2446–2453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. J & J.W. Eaton 1983. Effects of pleasure-boat traffic on macrophyte growth in canals, J. appl. Ecol. 20: 713–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapson, G. L., K. Thompson & J. D. Hodgson, 1997. The humped relationship between species richness and biomass - testing its sensitivity to quadrat size. J. Ecol. 85: 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. F. & G. G. Ksander, 1993. Spatial pattern analysis for underground propagules of Potamogeton gramineus L. in two Northern California irrigation canals. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 8: 297–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J., 1994. Spatial and temporal problems with monitoring. In Calow, P. & G. E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook, Vol. 2. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatcher, D., Eaton, J., Gibson, M. et al. Methodologies for surveying plant communities in artificial channels . Hydrobiologia 415, 87–91 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003881517387

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003881517387

Navigation