Skip to main content
Log in

Phenological patterns of Rhizophora L., Avicennia L. and Laguncularia Gaertn. f. in Amazonian mangrove swamps

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The phenology of flowering and fruiting of Rhizophora mangleL., R. harrisonii Leechman, Avicennia germinans(L.) Stearn and Laguncularia racemosa (L.) Gaertn. f., were studied on Maracá Island, a continental island situated between Cape Orange (04° 20′N) and Cape North (01° 40′N) in the state of Amapá, North Brazil. The study was carried out during a complete annual cycle from May 1995 to April 1996. All the phenophases were produced throughout the entire year at almost all of the six studied sites. However, they presented significant peaks which characterized seasonality for all of the measured variables focused in this study. Rhizophora mangle, Avicennia germinans and Laguncularia racemosa showed significant annual variation in flowering. By contrast, Rhizophora harrisonii presented evenly distributed flowering throughout the same period of observation. The fruiting patterns showed significant variation for all sites. In general, species presented flowering peaks from August to January when temperatures were high. Fruiting peaked from October to April and occurred mostly during the wet period. Although fruiting has correlated significantly with the wet period, the correlation was less significant than that between flowering and the dry period. The flowering burst during the driest period seems to complement the strategy in which massive fruit production is obtained during the wet period. Consequently, it may ensure the development of propagules and the continued occupation of mangrove forests along the intertidal zone in the Amazon region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belsley, D. A. E. Kuh & R. E. Welsch, 1980. Regression diagnostics: identifying ingluential data and source of collinearity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S. & N. L. Fowler, 1989. Seasonal patterns in a tropical lowland forest. Biotropica 21: 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, L. M., J. P. Jones, J. A. Vickery & S. Waldren, 1996. Seasonal patterns of leaf growth and loss, flowering and fruiting on a subtropical central pacific island. Biotropica 28: 164–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. C., 1989. Statistics for biologists. Cambridge University Press. 3rd Edn: 446 pp.

  • Christensen, B., 1978. Biomass and primary production of Rhizophora apiculata Bl. in a mangrove in southern Thailand. Aquat. Bot. 4: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, B. & S. Wium-Andersen, 1977. Seasonal growth in mangrove trees in southern Thailand. I. The phenology of Rhizophora apiculata Bl. Aquat. Bot. 3: 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croat, T. B., 1975. Phenological behavior of habit and habitat classes on Barro Colorado Island (Panama Canal Zone). Biotropica 7: 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. C., J. S. Bunt & W. T. Williams, 1984. Observations on the floral and vegetative phenologies of North-eastern Australian mangroves. Aust. J. Bot. 32: 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie, G. W., H. G. Baker & P. A. Opler, 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 62: 881–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, N. & R. H. Sauer, 1974. Phenological studies and modeling in grasslands. In Lieth, H. (ed.), Phenology and Seasonality Modeling. Chapman & Hall, London: 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. D., 1976. Nonparametric methods for quantitative analysis. Holt, Rinehart and Wisnton. 463 pp.

  • Gill, A. M. & P. B. Tomlinson, 1971. Studies of the growth of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.). 3. Phenology of the shoot. Biotropica 3: 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H., 1971. Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science, N.Y. 171: 203–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kigomo, B. N., S. R. Woodell & P. S. Savill, 1994. Phenological patterns and some aspects of reproductive biology of Brachylaena huillensis O. Hoffm. Afr. J. Ecol. 32: 296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann, D., 1982. Seasonality and phenology in a dry tropical forest in Ghana. J. Ecol. 70: 791–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaisse, F. P., 1974. Phenology of the Zambezian woodland area with emphasis on the miombo ecosystem. In Lieth, H. (ed.), Phenology and Seasonality Modeling. Chapman & Hall, London: 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monasterio, M. & G. Sarmiento, 1976. Phenological strategies of plant species in the tropical savanna and the semi-deciduous forest of the Venezuelan llanos. J. Biogeogr 3: 325–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, A., 1991. Exploring statistics with Minitab, a workbook for the behavioural sciences. Wiley & Sons: 247 pp.

  • Morellato, P. C. & H. F. Leitão-Filho, 1996. Reproductive phenology of climbers in a southeastern Brazilian forest. Biotropica 28: 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murali, K. S., 1993. Differential reproductive success in Cassia fistula in different habitats - a case of pollinator limitation? Curr. Sci. 65: 270–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council - U.S., 1981. Techiniques for the study of primate population ecology. National Academy Press, Washington: 233 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenger, P., 1982. Morphological, anatomical and reproductive adaptations of Australian mangroves. In Clough, B.F. (ed.), Mangrove ecosystems in Australia. ANU Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenger, P. & M. F. Bellan, 1995. The mangrove vegetation of the atlantic coast of Africa: a review. Unpublished Report: 64 pp. (English Version).

  • Schaeffer-Novelli, Y. & G. M. Cintron, 1988. Expedicão nacional aos manguezais do Amapá, Ilha deMaracá. Unpublished Report: 106 pp.

  • Seghieri, J. Ch. Floret & R. Pontanier, 1995. Plant phenology in relation to water availability: herbaceous and woody species in the savannas of northern Cameroon. J. Trop. Ecol. 11: 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., 1975. Estatística não-paramétrica, McGraw-Hill, Editora Santuário, Brasil: 350 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, T. D. & A. Rajh, 1995. Vegetative and floral phenology of the mangrove, Ceriops tagal with observations on the reproductive behaviour of Lumnitzera racemosa, in the mgeni estuary. S.-Afr. Tydskr. Plantk. 61: 240–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. B., 1986. The botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press. 413 pp.

  • Wielgolaski, F. E., 1974. Phenological studies in tundra. In Lieth, H. (ed.), Phenology and Seasonality Modeling. Chapman & Hall, London: 209–214. pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wium-Andersen, S., 1981. Seasonal growth of mangrove trees in southern Thailand. III. Phenology of Rhizophora mucronata Lamk. and Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea Gaertn. Aquat. Bot. 10: 371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wium-Andersen, S. & B. Christensen, 1978. Seasonal growth of mangrove trees in southern Thailand. II. Phenology of Bruguiera cylindrica, Ceriops tagal, Lumnitzera littorea and Avicennia marina. Aquat. Bot. 5: 383–390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandes, M.E.B. Phenological patterns of Rhizophora L., Avicennia L. and Laguncularia Gaertn. f. in Amazonian mangrove swamps . Hydrobiologia 413, 53–62 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003866108086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003866108086

Navigation