Skip to main content
Log in

Macrophyte cover and standing crop in the River Scorff and its tributaries (Brittany, northwestern France): scale, patterns and process

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to quantify macrophyte cover and standing crop, studies were performed in a main river and two tributaries in Brittany. Species and total plant cover were assessed using a pin-point method over a period of nearly three years. Spring and summer standing crops in the smaller tributary were collected along 1-m-long stretches, while, in the main river and the larger tributary, summer mean biomass was obtained from quadrats chosen from previous sampling on average macrophyte cover. Seasonal changes were found to be dependent on available light. They were more important in the tributary than in the main river. In the tributary, the species seasonal succession was: Ranunculus penicillatus, Oenanthe crocata, Apium nodiflorum. In the river, the following succession was observed: Bryophytes, R. penicillatus, Callitriche spp. (C. hamulata, C. platycarpa and C. obtusangula). In sunny stretches, minimum and maximum values of macrophyte cover were 17% and 89% of the stream bed, and 37% and 95% of the river bed, respectively. In the stream, mean summer standing crops were 28 g of dry weight per m2 (gDW/m2) in shaded and 58 gDW/m2 in sunny stretches. In the main river, the average biomasses (with reduced standard deviation) were 96 and 187 gDW/m2 for shaded and sunny stretches, respectively. These results are explained with regard to plant life strategies and species morphology; the consequences for fish habitat are pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baglinière, J. L. & A. Champigneulle, 1982. Densité des populations de truite commune (Salmo trutta L.) et de juvéniles de saumon atlantique (Salmo salar L.) sur le cours principal du Scorff (Bretagne): préférendums physiques et variations annuelles (1976–1980). Acta Oecol., Oecol. Applic. 3: 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, P. A., E. E. Prépas, H. R. Hamilton & M. L. Bothwell, 1991. Current velocity and its effect on aquatic macrophytes in flowing waters. Ecol. Applic. 1: 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H. & J. Haury, 1995. Effects of fish farms on phytocenoses in acidic rivers. Acta Bot. Gallica 142: 639–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., 1976. The annual production of the aquatic macrophyte Ranunculus penicillatus var. calcareus (R.W. Butcher) C. D. K. Cook. Aquat. Bot. 2: 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., 1980. Flowering of Ranunculus penicillatus (Dum.) Bab. var. calcareus (R.W. Butcher) C. D. K. Cook in the River Piddle (Dorset-England). Aquat. Bot. 9: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., E. Castellano & M. Ladle, 1979. Concept of species succession in relation to river vegetation and management. Verh. Int. Verein Theor. Angew. Limnol. 20: 1429–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson F. H. & W. N. Robinson, 1985. Submerged macrophytes and the hydraulic roughness of a lowland chalkstream. Verh. Int. Verein Theor. Angew. Limnol. 22: 1944–1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutartre, A., H. Codhant & N. Mary, 1994. Les végétaux aquatiques et le transfert des nutriments dans le fleuve Charente: les macrophytes. Symp. Relations continent-zones côtières, La Rochelle, 13–15 Septembre 1994: 10 pp.

  • Edwards, R. W. & M. Owens, 1960. The effects of plants on river conditions. 1: Summer crops and estimates of net productivity of macrophytes in a chalk-stream. J. Ecol. 48: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouesse-Aïdara, L., 1986. Biomasse, production, phénomètrie et composition minérale de quelques macrophytes des cours d'eau bretons. Thèse Dr-Ing. Ecologie, Univ. Rennes I: 135 pp.

  • Ham, S. F., Wright, A. D. Berrie, A. D. 1981 Growth and recession of aquatic macrophytes on an unshaded section of the River Lambourn, England, from 1971 to 1976. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, C. Den & S. Segal, 1964. A new classification of waterplants communities. Acta Bot. Neerl. 13: 67–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J., 1985. Etude écologique des macrophytes du Scorff (Bretagne-Sud). Thèse Dr.-Ing. Ecologie, Univ. Rennes I: 243 pp.

  • Haury, J., 1995. Patterns of macrophyte distribution within a Breton brook compared to other study scales. Landscape and Urban Planning 30: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J. & J. L. Baglinière, 1996. Les macrophytes, facteurs structurant de l'habitat piscicole en rivière à salmonides. Etude de microrépartition sur un secteur végétalisé du Scorff (Bretagne-Sud). Cybium 20 (3) suppl.: 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J. & L. Gouesse Aïdara, 1990. Etude méthodologique préliminaire de la biomasse des macrophytes en rivière. 14 ème Conf. Int. COLUMA 1: 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern-Hansen, U. & F. H. Dawson, 1978. The standing crop of aquatic plants of lowlands in Denmark and the interrelationships of nutrients in plant, sediment and water. Proc. Int. Symp. Aquat. Weeds 5: 143–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laforge, P. & D. Petitidier, 1997. Etude du phytobenthos dans différents types de rivières du bassin Rhin-Meuse. 5ème Conf. int. Limnologues Expression française, F.U.N.D.P., Namur, Belgique, 5–11/07/1997: 118 (summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makirinta, H., 1988. Ein neues ökomorphologisches Lebenformen-System der aquatischen Makrophyten. Phytocoenologia 4: 446–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, M. & R.W. Edwards, 1962. The effects of plants on river conditions. 3: Crop studies and estimates of net productivity of macrophytes in four streams in Southern England. J. Ecol. 50: 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltre, M. C., L. Léglize & J. L. Salleron, 1993. Végétation fixée et phosphore en petit cours d'eau. Conséquences d'une réduction des apports de phosphore. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 331: 357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, J. M., A. Bardonnet, J. Haury, J. L. Baglinière & E. Prévost, 1998. Végétation aquatique et peuplement pisciaire: approche expérimentale de l'enlèvement des macrophytes dans les radiers d'un cours d'eau breton. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 350–351: 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbatini M. R. & K. J. Murphy, 1996. Submerged plant survival strategies in relation to management and environmental pressures in drainage channel habitats. Hydrobiologia 340: 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spink, A, K. J. Murphy & D. F. Westlake, 1997. Distribution and environmental regulation of species of Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium in British rivers. Arch. f. Hydrobiol. 139: 509–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, D. F., 1963. Comparisons of plant productivity. Biol. Rev. 63: 385–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, D. F., 1975. Aquatic macrophytes. In Whitton, B.A. (ed.), River Ecology. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford: 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, D. F., H. Casey, F. H. Dawson, M. Ladle, R. H. K. Mann & A. F. H. Marker, 1972. The chalk-stream ecosystem. In Kajak, Z. & A. Hillbright-Ilkowska (eds.), Productivity Problems of Freshwater Ecosystems. Proc. IBP/UNESCO Symp. Krsimierz, Dolny Poland, 1970. Pol. Sci. Publ., Warsaw-Krakow: 615–635.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haury, J., Aïdara, L.G. Macrophyte cover and standing crop in the River Scorff and its tributaries (Brittany, northwestern France): scale, patterns and process . Hydrobiologia 415, 109–115 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003861028774

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003861028774

Navigation