Geologie en Mijnbouw

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 215–229 | Cite as

The actinopterygian fish fauna of the Late Kimmeridgian and Early Tithonian ‘Plattenkalke’ near Solnhofen (Bavaria, Germany): state of the art

  • Paul H. Lambers


An overview is presented of the actinopterygian fishes from the Late Jurassic (Late Kimmeridgian and Early Tithonian) ‘Plattenkalke’ near Solnhofen (Solnhofen lithographic limestone), Bavaria, Germany. The fish fauna is very diverse, with the palaeonisciform Coccolepis, halecostomes such as Lepidotes, Heterostrophus, three genera of macrosemiids and six genera of pycnodontiforms, halecomorphs including two genera of caturids, two genera of amiids, Ophiopsis, ‘Furo’, Ionoscopus, Brachyichthys, Callopterus, Liodesmus, ?Lophiurus, five genera of pachycormids, three genera of pholidophorids, Pleuropholis, two genera of aspidorhynchids and eleven genera of basal teleosts. Although several groups have been subject of revision, most of the fauna remains poorly known. Study of this rich fauna will provide a lot of information on the phylogeny and interrelationships of halecostome fishes.

Actinopterygii Coccolepidae Halecomorphi Halecostomi taxonomy Teleostei 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arratia, G. 1987a Orthogonikleithrus leichi n. gen., n. sp. (Pisces: Teleostei) from the Late Jurassic of Germany-Paläont. Z. 58: 309–320Google Scholar
  2. Arratia, G. 1987b Anaethalion and similar teleosts (Actinopterygii, Pisces) from the late Jurassic (Tithonian) of Southern Germany and their relationships-Palaeontographica 200-a: 1–44Google Scholar
  3. Arratia, G. 1996 Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny-Palaeo-Ichthyologica 7Google Scholar
  4. Arratia, G. & P.H. Lambers 1996 The caudal skeleton of Pachycormiformes: parallel evolution? In: Arratia G. & G. Viohl (eds) Mesozoic fishes-Systematics and palaeoecology-Verlag Dr. Pfeil, München: 395–407Google Scholar
  5. Assmann, P. 1906 Über Aspidorhynchus-Arch. Biontol. 1: 49–79Google Scholar
  6. Bartram, A. 1975 The holostean fish genus Ophiopsis Agassiz-Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 56: 183–205Google Scholar
  7. Bartram, A. 1977 The Macrosemiidae, a Mesozoic family of holostean fishes-Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.): 29: 137–234Google Scholar
  8. Biese, W. 1927 Über einige Pholidophoriden aus den lithografischen Schiefern Bayerns-N. Jb. Geol. Pal. 58, Beil. Bd. B: 50–100Google Scholar
  9. Brito, P. 1997 Révision des Aspidorhynchidae (Pisces, Actinopterygii) du Mésozoïque: ostéologie, relations phylogénétiques, données environnementales et biogéographiques-Geodiversitas 19: 681–672Google Scholar
  10. Coates, M.I. 1993 New actinopterygian fish from the Namurian Manse Burn formation of Bearsden, Scotland-Palaeontology 36: 123–146Google Scholar
  11. Eastman, Ch. 1914 Catalog of fossil fishes in the Carnegie Museum, Part 3, Descriptive catalog of fossil fishes from the lithographic stone of Solenhofen, Bavaria, France-Mem. Carn. Mus. 6(no. 7): 389–423Google Scholar
  12. Gardiner, B.G., J.G. Maisey & D.T.J. Littlewood 1996 Interrelationships of basal neopterygians. In: Stiassny, M., L. Parenti & G.D. Johnson (eds) Interrelationships of Fishes-Academic Press, London: 117–146Google Scholar
  13. Gaudant, J. 1978 Essai de revision taxonomique des Pholidophorus (poissons actinoptérygiens) du Jurassique Supérieur de Cerin (Ain)-Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon 16: 101–121Google Scholar
  14. Grande L. & Bemis, W. 1998 A comprehensive phylogentic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural histor-Soc. Vert. Pal. Mem. 4, x + 690 pp. Suppl. to J. Vert. Pal. 18 (1) 1998Google Scholar
  15. Heimberg, G. 1949 Neues Fischfunde aus dem Weißen Jura von Württemberg-Palaeontographica 97-A: 75–98Google Scholar
  16. Heineke, E. 1906 Die Ganoiden und Teleostier des lithografischen Schiefers von Nusplingen-Geol. Paläont. Abh. N.F. 8: 159–214Google Scholar
  17. Hennig, G. 1906 Gyrodus und die Organisation der Pycnodonten-Palaeontographica 53: 137–208Google Scholar
  18. Hennig, G. 1907 Ueber einige Pyknodonten vom Libanon-Cbl. Min. Geol. Pal. 1907: 360–371Google Scholar
  19. Jain, S.L. 1983 A review of the genus Lepidotes (Actinopterygii: Semionotiformes) with special reference to the species from Kota Formation (Lower Jurassic, India)-J. Paleont. Soc. India 28: 7–42Google Scholar
  20. Jain, S.L. 1985 Some new observations on Lepidotes maximus (Holostei: Semionotiformes) from the Upper Jurassic-J. Pal. Soc. India 30: 18–25Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, M.S. 1909 On a new specimen of the Jurassic ganoid fish Pleuropholis laevissima Egerton. Geol. Mag. (Dec. 5) 6: 309–311Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, O. 1961 Die Tier-und Pflanzenwelt der Solnhofener Schiefers. Mit vollständigem Arten und Schriftenverzeichnis-Geol. Bav. 48: 1–68Google Scholar
  23. Lambers, P.H. 1988 Orthocormus teyleri, nov. spec., the first pachycormid from the Kimmeridge lithographic limestone at Cerin (Ain), France; with remarks on the genus Orthocormus Weitzel-Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. B, 91: 369–391Google Scholar
  24. Lambers, P.H. 1991 The Upper Jurassic actinopterygian fish Gyrodus dichactinius Winkler 1986 (Gyrodus hexagonus [Blainville 1818]) from Solnhofen, Bavaria and anatomy of the genus Gyrodus Agassiz-Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 4: 489–544Google Scholar
  25. Lambers, P.H. 1992 On the ichthyofauna of the Solnhofen Lithographic Limestone (Upper Jurassic, Germany). Doctoral thesis, University of GroningenGoogle Scholar
  26. Lambers, P.H. 1994 The halecomorph fishes Caturus and Amblysemius in the Lithographic Limestone of Solnhofen (Tithonian), Bavaria-Geobios Mém. Spéc. 16: 91–99Google Scholar
  27. Lambers, P.H. 1995 The monophyly of the Caturidae (Pisces, Actinopterygii) and the phylogeny of the Halecomorphi. In: Lelievre, H., S. Wenz, A. Blieck & R. Cloutier (eds) Premiers Vertébrés et Vertébrés inférieurs. Geobios Mém. Spéc. 19: 201–203Google Scholar
  28. Lambers, P.H. 1998 The genus Furo (Pisces, Halecomorphi) from the Upper Jurassic Plattenkalke from Germany-Oryctos 1: 23–35Google Scholar
  29. Lange, S.P. 1968 Zur Morphologie und Taxonomie der Fischgattung Urocles aus Jura und Kreide Europas-Palaeontographica 131-A: 1–78Google Scholar
  30. Lehman, J.P. 1966 Actinopterygii. In: Piveteau, J., (ed.) Traité de Paleontologie 4(3): 1–242Google Scholar
  31. Lund, R. 1967 An analysis of the propulsive mechanism of fishes, with reference to some fossil actinopterygians-Ann. Carn. Mus. 39: 195–218Google Scholar
  32. Nursall, J.R. 1996 The phylogeny of pyncodont fishes. In: Arratia, G. & G. Viohl (eds) Mesozoic Fishes — Systematics and Palaeoecology-Verlag Dr. Pfeil, München: 125–153Google Scholar
  33. Nursall, R. & J.G. Maisey 1991 Neoproscinetes Figueiredo and Silva Santos 1987. In: Maisey, J.G. (ed.) Santana Fossils, An Illustrated Atlas-T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City: 125–137Google Scholar
  34. Nybelin, O. 1963 Zur Morphologie und Terminologie des Schwanzskelettes des Actinopterygiers-Ark. Zool. 15: 485–516Google Scholar
  35. Nybelin, O. 1964 Versuch einer taxonomischen Revision der Jurassischen Fischgattung Thrissops Ag-Göt. Vetensk. Samh. Handl. 6, 9B 4: 1–44Google Scholar
  36. Nybelin, O. 1967 Versuch einer taxonomischen Revision der Anaethalion Arten des Weißjura Deutschlands-Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Litt. Goth. Zool.Google Scholar
  37. Nybelin, O. 1974 A revision of the leptolepid fishes-Acta Reg. Soc. Scient. Litt. Goth. 9Google Scholar
  38. Olsen, P.E., & A.R. McCune 1991 Morphology of the Semionotus elegans species group from the Early Jurassic part of the Newark supergroup of Eastern North America with comments on the family Semionotidae (Neopterygii)-J. Vert. Paleont. 11: 269–292Google Scholar
  39. Patterson, C. 1973 Interrelationships of Holosteans. In: Greenwood, P.H., R.S. Miles & Colin Patterson (eds) Interrelationships of Fishes — Zool. J. Linn. Soc. London 53,Suppl. 1: 233–305Google Scholar
  40. Patterson, C. 1975 The braincase of Pholidophorus and Leptolepid fishes with a review of the actinopterygian braincase-Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. London (Biol. Sci.) 269: 275–579Google Scholar
  41. Patterson, C. 1977 The contribution of paleontology to teleostean phylogeny. In: Hecht, M.K., P.C. Goody & B.M. Hecht (eds) Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution-Plenum Press, New York: 579–643Google Scholar
  42. Patterson, C. & D.E. Rosen 1977 Review of ichtyodectiform and other mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils-Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158: 83–172Google Scholar
  43. Poyato-Ariza, F.J. & S. Wenz 1994 Naiathaelon okkidion n. g. n. sp. (Teleostei, Elopomorpha) from the Early Tithonian of Canjuers (Var, France)-Geobios Mém. Spéc. 16: 157–166Google Scholar
  44. Roman, J., F. Atrops, M. Arnaud, G. Barale, J.-M. Barrat, A. Boullier, A., F. de Broin, G.A. Gill, J.-G. Michard, Ph. Taquet & S. Wenz 1993 Le gisement Tithonien Inférieur des calcaires lithographiques de Canjuers (Var, France): état actuel des connaissances-Geobios Mém. Spéc. 16: 126–135Google Scholar
  45. Sauvage, H.-E. 1893 Note sur quelques poissons du calcaire bitumineux d'Orbagnoux (Ain)-Bull. Soc. d'Hist. Nat. d'Autun 7: 427–443Google Scholar
  46. Saint-Seine, P. de 1949 Les poissons des calcaires lithographiques de Cerin (Ain)-Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon 2: 357 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Saint-Seine, P. de 1955 Poissons fossiles de l'Etage de Stainleyville (Congo Belge) 1e partie: La faune des argilites et schistes bitumineux-Ann. Mus. roy. Congo Belge, 8o, Sci Géol. 14: XX + 126 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Taverne, L. 1975a Sur Leptolepis (Ascalabos) voithi (zu Münster 1839), téléostéen fossile du Jurassique supérieur de l'Europe et ses affinités systématiques-Biol. Jaarb. 43: 233–245Google Scholar
  49. Taverne, L. 1975b Considérations sur la position systématiques des genres fossiles Leptolepis et Allothrissops au sein des Téléostéens primitifs et sur l'origine et le polyphylétisme des poissons Téléostéens-Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. 5e S. 61: 336–371Google Scholar
  50. Taverne, L. 1977 Ostéologie et position systématique du genre Thrissops Ag. 1833 (sensu strictu) (Jurassique supérieur de l'Europe occ.) au sein des Téléostéens primitifs-Geobios 10: 5–33Google Scholar
  51. Taverne, L. 1981 Ostéologie et affinités systématiques de Leptolepides sprattiformis (Pisces, Teleostei) du Jurassique supérieur de l'Europe-Ann. Soc. Roy. Zool. Belg. 110: 7–28Google Scholar
  52. Thies, D. 1989 Sinneslinien bei dem Knochenfisch Lepidotes elvensis (Blainville, 1818) (Actinopterygii, γ Semionotiformes) aus dem Oberlias (Unter-Toarcium) von Grimmen in der DDR-N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh. 1989, 11: 692–704Google Scholar
  53. Thies, D. 1991 The osteology of the bony fish Tetragonolepis semicincta Bronn 1830 (Actinopterygii, γ Semionotiformes) from the Early Jurassic (Lower Toarcian) of Germany-Geologica et Palaeontologica 25, 251–297Google Scholar
  54. Thies, D. & Zapp, M. 1997 Ein Lepidotes (Actinopterygii, γ Semionotiformes) aus den Plattenkalken (Oberjura, oberes Kimmeridgium) bei Schamhaupten (Süddeutschland)-Archaeopteryx 15: 11–26Google Scholar
  55. Traquair, R.H. 1910 Les poissons Wealdiens de Bernissart-Mém. Mus. R. Hist. Nat. Belg. 5Google Scholar
  56. Vetter, B. 1881 Die Fische aus dem lithografischen Schiefer im Dresdener museum-Mitt. Koen. Min. Geol. Praeh. Mus. Dresden 4: 118 pp.Google Scholar
  57. Wagner, A. 1863 Monographie der fossilen Fische aus den lithographischen Schiefern Bayerns. Zweite Abtheilung-Abh. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. 2. Kl. 9, 3: 611–748Google Scholar
  58. Weitzel, K. 1930 Drei Riesenfische aus den Solnhofener Schiefern von Langenaltheim-Abh. Senckenb. Naturf. Ges. 42: 85–113Google Scholar
  59. Wenz, S, P. Bernier, G. Barale, G. Bourseau, E. Buffetaut, C. Gaillard & J.C. Gall 1993 L'Ichthyofaune des calcaires lithographiques du Kimméridgien supérieur de Cerin (Ain, France)-Geobios Mém. Spéc. 16: 61–70Google Scholar
  60. Winkler, T.C. 1862 Description de quelques nouvelles espèces de poissons fossiles du calcaire lithographique de Solnhofen-Nat. Verh. Holl. Mij. Wetensch. 2e verz. 16Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, A.S. 1891 Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) 2-London: Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.)Google Scholar
  62. Woodward, A.S. 1895 Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) 3-London: Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.)Google Scholar
  63. Woodward, A.S. 1929 The Upper Jurassic fish Heterostrophus-Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1929: 561–566Google Scholar
  64. Woodward, A.S. 1941 The mesozoic ganoid fishes of the genus Pholidophorus Agassiz-Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. London Ser. 11(6): 88–91Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul H. Lambers
    • 1
  1. 1.KB Amersfoortthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations