Skip to main content
Log in

Invertebrate hydraulic microhabitat and community structure in Callitriche stagnalis Scop. patches

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we report the structure of the benthic invertebrate community in submerged Callitriche stagnalis Scop. stands in relation to velocity, in a Scottish river, the Blane Water. We compared the community within the macrophyte beds to that of adjacent unvegetated substrate. Callitriche stagnalis stands supported different taxa richness (no. of taxa) and abundances (no. of individuals) of benthic invertebrates than the unvegetated riffle substrate (Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs test: p<0.01, n = 10). To see if different sections of the stands supported different invertebrate communities, samples were taken from the outer, mid and root sections of the stands. The sections were separated by Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) using their macroinvertebrate communities (eigenvalues: axis 1 = 0.6, axis 2 = 0.136). Abundance and taxa richness were different between the outer and mid sections, and between outer and root sections (Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs test: respectively p<0.05, p<0.01, n = 10). Community structure also differed between sections. The outer section community had a structure similar to that of an extreme environment where Simuliidae were dominant. Ephemerella ignita dominated in the mid and root sections. Differing combinations of plant structure and velocity appear to be a major factor influencing habitat structure, creating a range of stability conditions in the stands, which support the observed diversity of invertebrate assemblages present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carling, P. A., 1992. The nature of the fluid-boundary layer and the selection of parameters for benthic ecology. Freshwat. Biol. 28: 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degani, G., 1993. Relationship between current velocity, depth and the invertebrate community in a stable river system. Hydrobiologia 263: 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C. R. & P. S. Maitland, 1994. The ecology of the River Endrick: present status and changes since 1960. Hydrobiologia 290: 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. M. 1977. Some Methods for the Satistical Analysis of Samples of Benthic Invertebrates. Windmere, Freshwater Biological Association.

  • Gray, J. S., 1987. Species-abundance patterns. In Gee, J. H. R. & P. S. Giller (eds), Organisation of Communities; Past and Present. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, W. W. & F. L. Rose, 1982. The effects of aquatic macrophytes on the stream microenvironment. Aquat. Bot. 14: 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D. D., B. D. Clark & A. Jasentuliyana, 1996. Fine-scale field measurement of benthic flow environments inhabited by stream invertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. A., K. R. Wade & E. Pugh, 1984. Macroinvertebrate habitat relationships in the Tefi catchment and significance to conservation. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, E., T. M. Iversen, K. Sand-Jensen & C. P. Jorgensen, 1984. Økologiske konsekvenser af reduceret vandføring i Susån., Biologiske processor og vandvalitets-forhold. Miljøstryrelsen, Copenhagen.

  • Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. Ter Braak & O. F. R. Van Tongeren, 1987. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 299 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. J. P. & D. F. Westlake, 1990. Water velocities around water plants in chalk streams. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 25: 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbury, R. & M. Gaboury, 1993. Exploration and rehabilitation of hydraulic habitats in streams using principles of fluvial behavior. Freshwat. Biol. 29: 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, S. J., 1988. The micro-distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates in the Wye river system: the result of biotic or abiotic factors? Freshwat. Biol. 20: 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbatini M. R. & K. J. Murphy, 1996. Response of Callitriche stagnalis Scop. and Potamogeton crispus L. to cutting, dredging and shade in English drainage channels. J. Aquat. Plant Mgmt. 33: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K., 1998. Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams. Freshwat. Biol. 39: 663–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K. & J. R. Mebus, 1996. Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos 76: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K. & T. V. Madsen, 1992. Patch dynamics of the stream macrophyte, Callitriche cophocarpa. Freshwat. Biol. 27: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidney, S., 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., Tokyo: 312 pp.

  • Smith, I. R., 1975. Turbulence in lakes and rivers. Scientific publication no. 29. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, U.K: 79 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., 1992. Spatial and temporal occurrence of invertebrates in a chalk stream. Hydrobiol, 248: 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S., 1994. Life in moving fluids The physical biology of flow. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey: 467 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ó Hare, M.T., Murphy, K.J. Invertebrate hydraulic microhabitat and community structure in Callitriche stagnalis Scop. patches . Hydrobiologia 415, 169–176 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003827000258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003827000258

Navigation