Skip to main content
Log in

Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade universities have been subjected to various forms of academic accountability designed to maintain or improve the quality of their teaching and learning. A shared perspective of many of these accountability processes is that universities should become skilled at creating knowledge for the improvement of teaching and learning, and at modifying their behavior to reflect this new knowledge. In short, that universities should become “learning organizations.” What are the organizational characteristics of an academic learning organization? The paper will address this question by reviewing the adaptations in organizational structure and governance reported by universities attempting to improve the quality of their teaching and learning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. (1990). 'Shared learning', Management Science36(8), 938-957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. (1993). 'Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants', Sloan Management Review3, 85-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, E. (1963). 'Decision making in the academic world', in Halmos, P. (ed.), Sociological Studies in British University Education. Keele: University of Keele, pp. 93-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J.M. and Hargens, L.L. (1996). 'Variations among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D. and March, J.G. (1986). Leadership and Ambiguity (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D. and Sproull, L.S. (eds.) (1996). Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1991). 'The theory of the firm revisited', in Williamson, O.E. and Winter, S.G. (eds.), The Nature of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 159-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1992). 'Quality by design: Toward a framework for academic quality management', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 8. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 37-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1995). 'Through Deming's eyes: A cross-national analysis of quality assurance policies in higher education', Quality in Higher Education1(2), 95-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1997). 'Quality assurance policies and their impacts on academic institutions', LLinE2(4), 200-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. (1999). 'Student learning and academic choice: The rule of coherence', in Brennan, J., Fedrowitz, J., Huber, M. and Shah, T. (eds.), What Kind of University? International Perspectives on Knowledge, Participation and Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 56-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. and Sporn, B. (1995). 'University 2001: What will the university of the twenty-first century look like?', in Dill, D.D. and Sporn, B. (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 212-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). 'Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques', Human Relations50(9), 1085-1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin (1993). 'Building a learning organization', Harvard Business Review71(4), 78-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (1995). 'The university as an instrument for the development of science and basic research: The implications of mode 2 science', in Dill, D.D. and Sporn, B. (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 90-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996). 'Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration', Organization Science7(4), 375-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. and Sporn, B. (1999). 'Organizational adaptation and restructuring in higher education', in Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 104-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B. (1988). Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B.L., Nystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H. (1976). 'Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization', Administrative Science Quarterly2, 39-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R.M. and Clark, K.B. (1990). 'Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms', Administrative Science Quarterly35, 9-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P. (1991). 'Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature', Organization Science2, 88-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1993). 'Universal issues in the development of higher education', in Balderston, J.B. and Balderston, F.E. (eds.), Higher Education in Indonesia: Evolution and Reform. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California Press, pp. 19-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.H. (1993). 'The link between individual and organizational learning', Sloan Management Review35(1), 37-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). 'Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development', Strategic Management Journal13, 111-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988). 'Organizational learning', Annual Review of Sociology14, 319-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1991). 'Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning', Organization Science2(1), 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., Sproull, L.S. and Tamuz, M. (1991). 'Learning from samples of one or fewer', Organization Science2(1), 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F. (ed.) (1996). Resource Allocation in Higher Education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mets, L. (1997). 'Program review', in Peterson, M.W., Dill, D.D. and Mets, L.A. (eds.), Planning and Management for a Changing Environment: A Handbook on Redesigning Postsecondary Institutions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 88-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). 'Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony', American Journal of Sociology83, 440-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1988). 'On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in western Europe, 1986-1988', European Journal of Education23(1/2), 7-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights From Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peace-Lenn, M. (1997) 'Introduction', in Peace-Lenn, M. and Campos, L.B. (eds.), Globalization of the Professions and the Quality Imperative: Trade Agreements and Professional Accreditation, Certification, and Licensure. Madison, WI: Magna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990). 'The core competence of the corporation', Harvard Business Review3, 79-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and White, L.J. (1993). 'The university in the marketplace: Some insights and some puzzles', in Clotfelter, C.T. and Rothschild, M. (eds.), Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990a). The Fifth Dimension: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990b). 'The leader's new work: Building learning organizations', Sloan Management Review32(1), 7-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1993). 'Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude', Change25, 6-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). 'Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm', Strategic Management Journal17, 27-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M.A. (1983). 'Organizing the biological sciences at Berkeley', Change15, 28-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E.W.K. (1997). 'Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research', Human Relations50(1), 73-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1972). 'The self-evaluating organization', Public Administration Review32(5), 509-520.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dill, D.D. Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education 38, 127–154 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762420723

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762420723

Keywords

Navigation