Abstract
This paper examines a theoretical perspective on the ways in which children progress in learning mathematics. It suggests that there is a difficulty in associating teaching discourses with the mathematics they locate. This can result in an incommensurability between alternative perspectives being offered. The paper resists attempts to privilege any particular account but rather demands an analysis of these discourses and their presuppositions. In developing these themes the paper invokes Ricoeur's analysis of time and narrative as an analytical approach to treating notions such as transition, development and progression in mathematical learning. His notion of semantic innovation is introduced. This embraces both the introduction of a new metaphor into a sentence or the creation of a new narrative which reorganises events into a new ‘plot’. The notion is utilised in arguing that the shift in the student's mathematical development from arithmetic to first order linear equations with unknowns reconfigures the contextual parameters governing the understanding of these mathematical forms. It is also utilised in showing how alternative approaches to accounting for such transitions suit different and perhaps conflicting outcomes. For example, demonstrating awareness of generality or performing well in a diagnostic test featuring the solution of linear equations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, T.: 1996a, ‘Intention and significance in the teaching and learning of mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27, 52–66.
Brown, T.: 1996b, ‘Creating data in practitioner research’, Teaching and Teacher Education 12(3), 261–270.
Brown, T.: 1997, Mathematics Education and Language: Interpreting Hermeneutics and Post-structuralism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Brown, T., McNamara, O., Jones, L. and Hanley, U.: 1999, ‘Primary student teachers' understanding of mathematics and its teaching’, British Education Research Journal 25(3), 299–322.
Dowling, P.: 1996, ‘A sociological analysis of school mathematics texts’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 31, 389–415.
Filloy, E. and Rojano, T.: 1989, ‘Solving equations: the transition from arithmetic to algebra’, For the Learning of Mathematics 9(2), 19–25.
Gattegno, C.: 1978, The Science of Education. Part 2B: The Awareness of Mathematization, Educational Solutions, New York.
Gray, E. and Tall, D.: 1994, ‘Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: a ‘proceptual view’ of simple arithmetic’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25, 116–140.
Groden, M. and Kreiswirth, M.: 1994, The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Herscovics, N. and Linchevski, L.: 1994, ‘A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 25, 59–78.
Heywood, D. and Parker, J.: 1997, ‘Confronting the analogy: primary teachers exploring the usefulness of analogy in the teaching and learning of electricity’, International Journal of Science Education 19(8), 869–885.
Linchevski, L. and Herscovics, N.: 1996, ‘Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 30, 39–65.
Linchevski, L. and Williams, J.: 1996, ‘Situated intuitions, concrete manipulations and the construction of mathematical concepts: The case of integers’, Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference of the Group on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, University of Valencia, 3, pp. 265–272.
Mason, J.: 1996, ‘Expressing generality and roots of algebra’, in N. Bednarz, C. Kieran and L. Lee (eds.), Approaches to Algebra, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 65–86.
Presmeg, N.: 1997, ‘Reasoning with metaphors and metonymies in mathematics learning’, in L. English, (ed.), Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors and Images, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Ricoeur, P.: 1978, The Rule of Metaphor, Routledge, London.
Ricoeur, P.: 1981, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ricoeur, P.: 1984, Time and Narrative Volume 1, The University of Chicago Press, London.
Ricoeur, P.: 1985, Time and Narrative Volume 2, The University of Chicago Press, London.
Ricoeur, P.: 1988, Time and Narrative Volume 3, The University of Chicago Press, London.
Rodd, M.: 1993, ‘Students' views on the nature of mathematics’, Mathematics Teaching 143, 8–10.
Ruthven, K. and Coe, R.: 1994, ‘A structural analysis of students' epistemic views’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 27, 101–109.
Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L.: 1994a, ‘The gains and pitfalls of reification — the case of algebra’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 26, 191–228.
Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L.: 1994b, ‘A tale of two students; the interpreter and the doer’, Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference of the Group on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, University of Lisbon, Vol 4, pp. 257–264.
Tahta, D.: 1991, ‘Understanding and desire’, in D. Pimm and E. Love (eds.), Teaching and Learning School Mathematics, Hodder and Stoughton, London.
Walkerdine, V.: 1988, The Mastery of Reason, Routledge, London.
Wilden, A.: 1980, System and Structure, Tavistock, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, T., Eade, F. & Wilson, D. Semantic Innovation: Arithmetical and Algebraic Metaphors Within Narratives of Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics 40, 53–70 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003738611811
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003738611811