Skip to main content
Log in

Difference Posets in the Quantum StructuresBackground

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the conditions for D-posets to become orthoalgebras, orthomodularposets, orthomodular lattices, MV-algebras, and Boolean algebras are presented.Also some properties of observables are investigated. It is proved that any tworegular observables in an atomic σ-complete Boolean D-poset have a jointobservable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Chang, C. C., Algebraic analysis of many valued logics, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 88 (1957), 467-490.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chovanec, F., and Kôpka, F., On a representation of observables in D-posets of fuzzy sets, Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 1 (1992), 19-25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chovanec, F., and Kôpka, F., Boolean D-posets, Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 10 (1997), 183-197.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cignoli, R., Complete and atomic algebras of the infinite valued Lukasiewicz logic, Studia Logica 50 (1991), 375-384.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dvurečenskij, A., Chovanec, F., and Rybáriková, E., D-homomorphisms and atomic scomplete Boolean D-posets, Soft Computing.

  6. Dvurečenskij, A., and Pulmannová, S., Difference posets, effects, and quantum measurements, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 33 (1994), 819-850.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foulis, D. J., Coupled Physical Systems, Found. Phys. 19 (1989), 905-922.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foulis, D. J., and Bennett, M. K., Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics, Found. Phys. 24 (1994), 1331-1352.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foulis, D. J., Greechie, R. J., and Rüttimann, G. T., Filters and supports in orthoalgebras, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31 (1992), 789-807.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giuntini, R., and Greuling, H., Toward a formal language for unsharp properties, Found. Phys. 20 (1989), 931-945.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jurečková, M., and Riečan, B., Weak law of large numbers for weak observables in MValgebras, Tatra Mountains Math. Pub. 12 (1997), 221-228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kôpka, F., and Chovanec, F., D-posets, Math. Slovaca 44 (1994), 21-34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mesiar, R., and Riečan, B., On the joint observable in some quantum structures, Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 3 (1993), 183-190.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Navara, M., and Pták, P., Difference posets and orthoalgebras, Submitted.

  15. Pták, P., and Pulmannová, S., Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics, VEDA, Bratislava, and Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riečan, B., and Neubrunn, T., Integral, Measure, and Ordering, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sikorski, R., Boolean Algebras, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Varadarajan, V. S., Geometry of Quantum Theory, Van Nostrand, New York (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chovanec, F., Kôpka, F. Difference Posets in the Quantum StructuresBackground. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39, 571–583 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003625401906

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003625401906

Keywords

Navigation