Abstract
The cause of the incipience of the anode effect in alumina reduction cells has long been a controversial issue. The most plausible interpretations are (i) an insufficient release of the gaseous phase from underneath the anode surface together with the action of diminished wettability and (ii) the depletion of oxygen-containing ions at the anode surface to result in the limiting current condition. It is shown by means of a mathematical model that each of these effects may be active. The predominant mechanism depends on the operational conditions. Theoretical results are compared with experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Thonstad, F. Nordmo, A.H. Husøy, K. Ø. Vee and D.C. Austrheim, in ‘Light Metals 1984’, edited by J.P. McGeer (Warrendale 1984), p. 825.
R. Bunsen, [Poggendorff's] Ann. Physik 92 (1854) 648.
K. Grjotheim, C. Krohn, M. Malinovský, K. Matiasovský and J. Thonstad, ‘Aluminium Electrolysis’ (Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1977; 2nd edn. 1982).
H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta 42 (1997) 2695.
H. Vogt, J. Appl. Electrochem. 29:2 (1999) 137.
J. Thonstad, F. Nordmo and K. Vee, Electrochim. Acta 19 (1973) 27.
J. Thonstad, Electrochim. Acta 12 (1967) 1219.
J. Thonstad, F. Nordmo and J.K. Rùdseth, Electrochim. Acta 19 (1974) 761.
H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta 29 (1984) 167 and 175.
H. Vogt, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990) 1179.
H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta 32 (1987) 633.
H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta 38 (1993) 1421.
K. Stephan, H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta 24 (1979) 11.
A.I. Beljaev, M. B. Rapoport and L.A. Firsanova, ‘Metallurgie des Aluminiums’, vol. 1 (Verlag der Technik, Berlin 1956) pp. 121 ff.
A.I. Beljaev, E.A. Zhemchuzhina and L.A. Firsanova, ‘Physika-lische Chemie geschmolzener Salze. (Dt. Verlag für Grundstoffin-dustrie, Leipzig, 1964).
K. Matiasovský, M. Paucirova and M. Malinovský, Chem. Zvesti 17 (1963) 181.
Z. Qiu, C. Wei and M. Chang, ‘Light Metals 1982’, edited by J.E. Andersen (Metallurgical Society AIME, Warrendale, 1982), p. 279.
H. Vogt, in ‘Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry’ (edited by E. Yeager, J.O'M. Bockris, B.E. Conway, S. Sarangapani, vol. 6 (Plenum, New York, 1983), p. 455.
J. Zoric, I. Roušar and J. Thonstad, J. Appl. Electrochem. 27 (1997) 916.
A.V. Nikitin, V.A. Kryukovskii, and N.S. Mikhalitsin, Tsvetn. Met. 16 (8) (1975) 31; Sov. J. Non-Ferrous Met. 16 (8) (1975) 37.
A. Solheim, S.T. Johansen, S. Rolseth, and J. Thonstad, J. Appl. Electrochem. 19 (1989) 703.
V. Schischkin, Z. Elektrochemie 33 (1927) 83.
Qiu Z. and Zhang M., Aluminium 61 (1985) 911.
Qui Z. and Zhang M., Electrochim. Acta 32 (1987) 607.
N.E. Richards, ‘Light Metals 1998’, edited by B. Welch (Warrendale, 1998), p. 521.
R. Piontelli, B. Mazza and P. Pedeferri, Electrochim. Acta 16 (1965) 1117.
R. Piontelli, B. Mazza and P. Pedeferri, Metallurg. Ital. 57 (2) (1965) 1.
G. Oesterheld and H. Brunner, Z. Elektrochemie 22 (1916) 38.
K. Arndt and H. Probst, Z. Elektrochemie 29 (1923) 323.
G.-E. Taylor, Trans. Amer. Electrochem. Soc. 47 (1925) 301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vogt, H. Effect of alumina concentration on the incipience of the anode effect in aluminium electrolysis. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 29, 779–788 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003575232103
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003575232103