Skip to main content
Log in

Interspecific hybridization between sunflower and wild perennial Helianthus species via embryo rescue

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interspecific crosses were made between the cultivated sunflower inbred line HA89 and accessions of five wild perennial Helianthus species (H. giganteus L., H. laevigatus T. & G., H. resinosus Small, H. pauciflorus Nutt. and H. decapetalus L.) resistant to broomrape ( Orobanche cernua Loefl.). Using the genetic male-sterile isogenic version of that line as female, successful reciprocal crosses were also obtained with all these wild species except with H. decapetalus. Five-day-old hybrid embryos were excised and cultured in vitro. In all cases, few mature plants were obtained from embryos in early developmental stages (early heart and globular) but up to 28% mature plants were obtained from embryos in later stages of development. Very immature embryos were difficult to excise without damage. Hybrid embryos and mature plants were obtained from all five wild species. Interspecific hybrid embryos from different wild species showed distinct developmental potentials, the proportion of hybrid embryos in different developmental stages varying among species. Differences in the proportion of hybrid embryos at the several developmental stages were also obtained for the reciprocal crosses (cultivated × wild), which showed higher proportion of fully developed embryos. Hybrids involving H. giganteus and cultivated sunflower were difficult to obtain without the use of embryo culture. Embryo culture proved to be an useful tool to overcome post-zygotic hybrid incompatibility in different Helianthus spp., and facilitated interspecific transfer of resistance to O. cernua.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, M.P., 1969. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol 44: 117–122.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atlagic, J., 1996. Cytogenetic studies in hexaploid Helianthus species and their F1 hybrids with cultivated sunflower, H. annuus. Plant Breed 115: 257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J.M. & B.H. Beard, 1983. Embryo culture of Helianthus hybrids. Crop Sci 23: 1004–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J.M., C.C. Jan & B.H. Beard, 1986. Chromosomal differentiation among the annual Helianthus spp. Syst Bot 11: 354–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christov, M., 1991. Possibilities and problems in the hybridization of cultivated sunflower with species of the genus Helianthus L. Helia 15: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denat, J.F., M. Coumans, H. Serieys & R. Jonard, 1991. Definition d'un milieu de culture permettant le developpement d'embryons immatures de tournesol de 3 jours. Application à l'obtention d'hybrides interspecifiques. CR Acad Sci Paris, t. 313, Serie 3: 145–151.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Espinasse, A., C. Lay & C.D. Dybing, 1985. Factors controlling in vitro development of sunflower embryos. Agronomie 5: 825–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinasse, A., J. Volin, C.D. Dybing & C. Lay, 1991. Embryo rescue through on ovule culture in Helianthus. Crop Sci 31: 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Q., H.T. Stalker & H.E. Patee, 1996. Plant recovery of selfs and interspecific hybrids of Arachis by in vitro culture of peg tips. Crop Sci 36: 1660–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, J.J., 1987. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of hybrid sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) on a high sucrose-containing medium. Plant Cell Rep 6: 372–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg, O.L., R.A. Miller & K. Ojima, 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgieva-Todorova, J., 1984. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Helianthus L. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg 93: 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C.B., W.C. Martin & D.M. Smith. 1962. Species crosses in Helianthus. I diploid species. Brittonia 14: 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iuoras, M., 1987. FAO sunflower sub-network report 1984–86. pp. 1–15. In: D. Skoric (Ed), Genetic Evaluation of Helianthus Wild Species and Their Use in Breeding Programs. FAO, Szeged, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, C.C., 1988. Chromosome doubling of wild x cultivated sun-flower interspecific hybrids and its direct effect on backcross success. In: Proc. Int. Sunflower Conf., 12th, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. Int. Sunf. Assoc., Paris, France, pp. 287–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, C.C., J.M. Chandler & S.A. Wagner, 1988. Induced tetraploid and trisomic production of Helianthus annuus L. Genome 30: 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, C.C., 1992. Registration of four nuclear male-sterile sunflower genetic stock lines. Crop Sci 32: 1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan, C.C., 1996. Developing unique interspecific germplasm for sunflower improvement. Biotechnology & wild species. In: Proc. Int. Sunflower Conf., 14th, Beijing-Shenyang, P.R. China. Int. Sunf. Assoc., Paris, France, pp. 1111–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, C.C., 1997. Cytology and interspecific hybridization. In: A.S. Albert (Ed), Sunflower Technology and Production, pp. 497–558. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kräuter, R., A. Steinmetz & W. Friedt. 1991. Efficient interspecific hybridization in the genus Helianthus via ‘embryo rescue’ and characterization of the hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 82: 521–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laferrière, J.E., 1986. Interspecific hybridization in sunflowers: an illustration of the importance of wild genetic resources in plant breeding. Outlo Agricul 15: 104–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnier, M., 1976. Culture in vitro de l'embryon immature de Capsella bursa-pastoris Moench. Rev Cyt Biol Veget 39: 1–120.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, W., 1973. The development of the embryo sac of sunflower Helianthus annuus after fertilization. Can J Bot 51: 879–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G.C. & G.B. Collins, 1979. In vitro tissue culture of selected legumes and plant regeneration from callus cultures of red clover. Crop Sci 19: 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, V., 1976. Experimental Embryogenesis in Vascular Plants. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruso, J., S. Sukno, J. Domínguez-Giménez, J.M. Melero-Vara & J.M. Fernández-Martínez, 1996. Screening of wild Helianthus species and derived lines for resistance to several populations of Orobanche cernua. Plant Dis 80: 1165–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, G.J. & L.H. Rieseberg, 1997. Systematics, origin and germplasm resources of the wild and domesticated sunflower. In: A.S. Albert (Ed), Sunflower Technology and Production, pp. 21–26. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoric, D., 1992. Achievements and future directions of sunflower breeding. Field Crops Res 30: 231–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, A. & D.R. Davis, 1979. The culture of immature pea embryos. Ann Bot 44: 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukno, S., C.C. Jan, J.M. Melero-Vara & J.M. Fernández-Martínez, 1998. Sunflower interspecific hybrids: reproductive behaviour and broomrape resistance. Plant Breed 118: 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T.E., D.C. Zimmerman & C.E. Rogers. 1981. Wild Helianthus as a genetic resource. Field Crops Res 4: 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sukno, S., Ruso, J., Jan, C. et al. Interspecific hybridization between sunflower and wild perennial Helianthus species via embryo rescue. Euphytica 106, 69–78 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003524822284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003524822284

Navigation