Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business valuing in academia

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, M. (1992). Imposters in the Temple: The Decline and Fall of the American University. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlton, D.M. and Kalikow, T.J. (1986). ‘Who will offer the degrees of the future?’, North Central Association Quarterly 60(3), 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. (1985). ‘Academic freedom: A structural approach’, Educational Theory 35(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A.W. (1985). ‘Involvement the cornerstone of excellence’, Change 17(40), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L. (1963). Initation to Sociology: A Humanistic Approach. New York: Anchor/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1987). The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1990). Dwarfs and Giants. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilik, L.J. and Blum, M.C. (1989). ‘Deja vu all over again: Incentives in academic management’, Academe 75(1), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1982). Beyond the Ivory Tower: Social Responsibilities of the Modern University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1986). ‘Toward higher learning: The importance of assessing outcomes’, Change 18(60), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L.H., McFerron, J.R. and Lynch, D.M. (1987). ‘Support for teaching the liberal arts: an institutional dilemma’, Higher Education 16(4), 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M. (1906). ‘The University of Berlin and and the proposed changes in the German system of national education’, The Arena. October, pp. 345–351.

  • Callahan, R.E. (1962). Education and the Cult of Efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P.C. and Crebert, R.C. (1991). ‘Ivory tower to concrete jungle: The difficult transition from the academy to the workplace of learning environment’, Journal of Higher Educatian 62(5), 570–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.M. (1964). The Social and Political World of the Muckrakers. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, T.B. (1985). ‘Nattering nabobs, habits of the mind, persons in relation: The future of liberal arts education in a specialized society’, Liberal Education 71(1), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camera (1995). ‘Multi-million deal’, December 24, p. 1.

  • ‘Democracy and the colleges’ (1910). The Nation. 21 April, pp. 395–396.

  • Fairweather, J.S. (1989). ‘Academic research and instruction: The industrial connection’, Journal of Higher Education 60(4), 200–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, C. (1984). ‘Trying higher education: An eight count indictment’, Change 16(4), 28–33, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D.P. (1988). ‘Issues confronting American education’, Higher Education 16(3), 230– 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giamatti, A.B. (1976). A Free and Ordered Space: The Real World of the University. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. (1962). The Community of Scholars. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariman, R. (1991). ‘The liberal matrix: Pluralism and professionalism in the American university’, Journal of Higher Education 61(4), 451–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, H.B. (1986). ‘Reform? Higher education? Don't be absurd’, Phi Delta Kappan 68(4), 217, 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, R.M. (1936). The Higher Learning in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.E.L. and Carter, R.E. (1959). ‘Some procedures for estimating ‘news holes’ in content analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly 23, 399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, H.P. (1901). Munsey's. The University of Chicago. November, pp. 154–165.

  • Kadish, M.R. (1991). Toward an Ethic in Higher Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1984). ‘Liberal learning: A record of presidential neglect’, Change 16(6), 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G.T. (1903). ‘How shall the college curriculum be determined?’, The Forum. July– September, pp. 130–148.

  • Logan, R.D. & Mannino, J.D. (1988). ‘The two pillars of wisdom: And the dummying-down of higher education’, Liberal Education 74(1), 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, F.W. (1971). ‘Educational accountability: A social science critique’, Planning and Changing 2(1), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, F.W. (1988). ‘Reforming education in the 1980s’, Peabody Journal of Education 63(4), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, T.J. (1986). ‘College: Raising a new vision’, Change 18(6), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F.R. (1984). ‘Entrepreneurism: The Trojan horse of education’, College Board Review 133, 16–19, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mieczkowski, B. (1995). The Rot at the Top: Dysfunctional Bureauracy in Academia. Landaqm, MD: University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C.M. (1902). ‘The schools in the promotion of progress’, The Arena. July, pp. 15–20.

  • Needham, H.B. (1905a). ‘The college athlete: His amateur code: Its evasion and administration’, McClure's. July, pp. 260–273.

  • Needham, H.B. (1905b) ‘The college athlete: His commercialism is making him a professional’, McClure's. pp. 115–128.

  • Newman, J.H. (1960). The Idea of the University. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Observation in a big university’ (1903). The Nation. 22 January, pp. 67–69.

  • ‘Our democratic American college’ (1909). The Nation. 1 April, pp. 324–326.

  • Perkin, H. (1984–85). ‘Redesigning the university for the 1980s and beyond: An international perspective’, College Board Rewiew 134, 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Personal communications to Frank W. Lutz, 1993–95. Professional college coaches’ (1903). The Nation. 16 July, pp. 46–47.

  • Quehl, G.H. (1988). ‘Higher education and the public interest’, Academe 74(5), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regier, C.C. (1932). The Era of the Muckrakers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Register (1995). ‘In search of quality in higher education’, November 19, p. 1.

  • Reitman, S.W. (1992). The Educational Messiah Complex: America's Faith in the Culturally Redemptive Value of Schools. Sacramento, CA: Caddo Gap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway, E.J. (1901). ‘College fraternities’, Munsey's. February, pp. 728–742.

  • Riesman, D. (1958). Constraint and Vanety in American Education. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday, Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, F. (1984). ‘Power of professors: The impact of specialization and professionalization on the curriculum’, Change 16(4), 12–17, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, R.J. (1967). The School as a Center for Inquiry. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Scholarship in a great republic – and elsewhere’ (1901). The Nation. 6 May, pp. 391–392.

  • ‘Scholarship and research’ (1907). The Nation. 10 February, pp. 131–132.

  • Shapiro, H. (1968). The Muckrackers and American Society. Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, H.T. (1990). ‘Reflections on the future of unitersity based rearch’, Educational Record 71(2), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, M. (1990). ‘College Sports Inc.: The athletic department vs. the university’, Phi Delta Kappan 72(12), K1–K12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (1994). The American School: 1646–1993. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Story, D. (1901.) ‘A menace to freedom: The college trust’, The Arena. September, pp. 244– 257.

  • Stratton, G.M. (1907). ‘The power of the Yale faculty’, The Nation. 14 November, p. 443.

  • ‘Teacher of the old school’ (1909). The Nation. 7 January, pp. 8–9.

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1905). ‘The qualitative study of education’, The Forum. January–March, pp. 443–440.

  • ‘The football debauch’ (1902). The Nation. 4 December, pp. 441–442.

  • ‘The superfluous in education’ (1911). The Nation. 27 April, pp. 417–418.

  • Turnbull, W.W. (1986). ‘Are they learning anything in college?’, Change 16(5), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘University administration’ (1908). The Nation. 3 December, pp. 551–552.

  • Veblen, T. (1918). The Higher Learning in American. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, T.E. (1901a). ‘A college for the people’, The Arena. July, pp. 15–20.

  • Will, T.E. (1901b). ‘A menace to freedom: The college trust’, The Arena. September, pp. 244– 257.

  • Wilshire, B. (1987). ‘Can the university defend the values upon which it stands?’, Journal of Higher Education 58(3), 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshire, B. (1990). ‘Professionalization as purification ritual: Allination and disintegration in the university’, Journal of Higher Education 61(3), 280–293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas-Pan American, 1201 W. University Drive, Edinburg, TX, 78539-2999, USA.

    Frank W. Lutz

  2. St. Mary's College, 700 Terrace Heights #36, Winona, MN, 55987-1399, USA.

    Robert W. Field

Authors
  1. Frank W. Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert W. Field
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, F.W., Field, R.W. Business valuing in academia. Higher Education 36, 383–420 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003473919179

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003473919179

Search

Navigation