Abstract
Responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory were obtained from 2,288 post-foundation students taking courses by distance learning at the Open University. A factor analysis of their subscale scores produced a solution that was commensurable with results of earlier research carried out with campus-based students. Indeed, their approaches to studying were more appropriate to the avowed aims of higher education, but this could be attributed to age differences between campus-based and distance-learning students. The approaches to studying of distance-learning students were affected by background variables such as gender, age, academic discipline and prior education, and they were more appropriate to the avowed aims of higher education than those of other students taking foundation courses by distance learning. Even when effects of background variables were taken into account, the distance-learning students' approaches to studying were related to pass rates and final grades. In particular, there was a strong negative association between reproducing orientation and academic outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babbie, E.R. (1973). Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Biggs, J.B. (1970). ‘Personality correlates of certain dimensions of study behaviour’, Australian Journal of Psychology 22, 287-297.
Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Bligh, D., Caves, R. and Settle, G. (1980). ‘“A” level scores and degree classifications as functions of university type and subject’, in Billing, D. (ed.), Indicators of Performance. Guildford, U.K.: Society for Research into Higher Education, pp. 17-30.
Caplan, P.J., Crawford, M., Hyde, J.S. and Richardson, J.T.E. (1997). Gender Differences in Human Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cattell, R.B. (1966). ‘The scree test for the number of factors’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 1, 245-276.
Clarke, R.M. (1986). ‘Students' approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: A cross-sectional study’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 56, 309-321.
Clarke, S. (1988). ‘Another look at the degree results of men and women’, Studies in Higher Education 13, 315-331.
Clennell, S. (ed.) (1984). Older Students in the Open University. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University.
Cohen, G., Stanhope, N. and Conway, M.A. (1992). ‘Age differences in the retention of knowledge by young and elderly students’, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 10, 153-164.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Coldeway, D.O. (1982). ‘Recent research in distance learning’, in Daniel, J.S., Stroud, M.A. and Thompson, J.R. (eds.), Learning at a Distance: A World Perspective. Edmonton: Athabasca University/International Council for Correspondence Education, pp. 29-37.
Coles, C.R. (1985). ‘Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their students' approaches to studying’, Medical Education 19, 308-309.
Conway, M. and Ross, M. (1984). ‘Getting what you want by revising what you had’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 738-748.
Daniel, J.S. (1996). Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1981). Applied Regression Analysis (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.
Ekins, J.M. (1992a). ‘The development of study processes in distance learning students’, in Jung, I.S. and Shin, W.J. (eds.), The Role of Open Universities in Promoting Education for All. Seoul: Korea Air and Correspondence University, pp. 331-345. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 402)
Ekins, J.M. (1992b, November). Study Approaches of Distance Learning Students, Studying in a Second Language. Paper presented at the 16th World Conference of the International Council for Distance Education, ‘Distance Education for the Twenty-First Century’, Nonthaburi, Thailand. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 810)
Entwistle, N., Hanley, M. and Hounsell, D. (1979). ‘Identifying distinctive approaches to studying’, Higher Education 8, 365-380.
Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
Faith, K. and Coulter, R.P. (1988). ‘Home study: Keeping women in their place?’, in Sewart, D. and Daniel, J.S. (eds.), Developing Distance Education. Oslo: International Council for Distance Education, pp. 195-198.
Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1990). ‘Does higher education promote independent learning?’, Higher Education 19, 307-322.
Harper, G. and Kember, D. (1986). ‘Approaches to study of distance education students’, British Journal of Educational Technology 17, 212-222.
Harper, G. and Kember. D. (1989). ‘Interpretation of factor analyses from the Approaches to Studying Inventory’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 59, 66-74.
Harris, D. (1987). Openness and Closure in Distance Education. Lewes, U.K.: Falmer Press.
Hayes, K. and Richardson, J.T.E. (1995). ‘Gender, subject and context as determinants of approaches to studying in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education 20, 215-221.
Hedges, L.V. and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Kember, D. (1995). Open Learning Courses for Adults: A Model of Student Progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kember, D. and Harper, G. (1987). ‘Implications for instruction arising from the relationship between approaches to studying and academic outcomes’, Instructional Science 16, 35-46.
Kidder, L.H. (1981). Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kim, J.-O. and Mueller, C.W. (1994). ‘Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues’, in Lewis-Beck, M.S. (ed.), Factor Analysis and Related Techniques. London: Sage, pp. 75-155.
Kirkup, G. and von Prümmer, C. (1990). ‘Support and connectedness: The needs of women distance education students’, Journal of Distance Education 5(2), 9-31.
Köymen, U.S. (1992). ‘Comparison of learning and study strategies of traditional and openlearning-system students in Turkey’, Distance Education 13, 108-117.
Lewis, R. and Spencer, D. (1986). What is Open Learning? An Introduction to the Series (Open Learning Guide 4). London: Council for Educational Technology.
Marland, P. (1989). ‘An approach to research on distance learning’, British Journal of Educational Technology 20, 173-182.
Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. and Beaty, E. (1993). ‘Conceptions of learning’, International Journal of Educational Research 19, 277-300.
Meyer, J.H.F. (1988). ‘Student perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying’, South African Journal of Higher Education 2, 73-82.
Meyer, J.H.F. and Dunne, T.T. (1991). ‘Study approaches of nursing students: Effects of an extended clinical context’, Medical Education 25, 497-516.
Meyer, J.H.F., Dunne, T.T. and Richardson, J.T.E. (1994). ‘A gender comparison of contextualized study behaviour in higher education’, Higher Education 27, 469-485.
Meyer, J.H.F. and Parsons, P. (1989). Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the Lancaster Inventory: A comparative study' Studies in Higher Education 14, 137-153.
Miller, C.D., Finley, J. and McKinley, D.L. (1990). ‘Learning approaches and motives: Male and female differences and implications for learning assistance programs’, Journal of College Student Development 31, 147-154.
Montanelli, R.G., Jr. and Humphreys, L.G. (1976). ‘Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: A Monte Carlo study’, Psychometrika 41, 341-348.
Morgan, A. (1984). ‘A report on qualitative methodologies in research in distance education’, Distance Education 5, 252-267.
Morgan, A. (1991). Research into Student Learning in Distance Education. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University. Underdale, South Australia: University of South Australia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 371)
Morgan, A., Gibbs, G. and Taylor, E. (1980). Students' Approaches to Studying the Social Science and Technology Foundation Courses: Preliminary Studies (Study Methods Group Report No. 4). Milton Keynes: Open University, Institute of Educational Techology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 639)
Newble, D.I. and Clarke, R.M. (1986). ‘The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in an innovative problem-based medical school’, Medical Education 20, 267-273.
Newble, D. and Clarke, R. (1987). ‘Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative medical school’, in Richardson, J.T.E., Eysenck, M.W. and Warren Piper, D. (eds.), Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes, U.K.: SRHE and Open University Press, pp. 39-46.
Parsons, P. (1988). ‘The Lancaster Approaches to Studying Inventory and Course Perceptions Questionnaire: A replicated study at the Cape Technikon’, South African Journal of Higher Education 2, 103-111.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction (3rd edn.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N.J. (1981). ‘Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 368-383.
Richardson, J.T.E. (1993). ‘Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory’, Studies in Higher Education 18, 3-13.
Richardson, J.T.E. (1994a). ‘Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: A literature survey’, Higher Education 27, 449-468.
Richardson, J.T.E. (1994b). ‘Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying’, Studies in Higher Education 19, 309-325.
Richardson, J.T.E. (1994c). ‘Mature students in higher education: Academic performance and intellectual ability’, Higher Education 28, 373-386.
Richardson, J.T.E. (1996). ‘Measures of effect size’, Behavior ResearchMethods, Instruments, and Computers 28, 12-22.
Richardson, J.T.E. and King, E. (1991). ‘Gender differences in the experience of higher education: Quantitative and qualitative approaches’, Educational Psychology 11, 363-382.
Rumble, G. (1989). ‘“Open learning”, “distance learning”, and the misuse of language’, Open Learning 4, 28-36.
Severiens, S.E. and ten Dam, G.T.M. (1994). ‘Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis’, Higher Education 27, 487-501.
Thomas, K. (1988). ‘Gender and the arts/science divide in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education 13, 123-137.
Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and Subject in Higher Education. Buckingham, U.K.: SRHE and Open University Press.
Thorpe, M. and Grugeon, D. (1987). ‘Moving into open learning’, in Thorpe, M. and Grugeon, D. (eds.), Open Learning for Adults. Harlow, U.K.: Longman, pp. 1-11.
Vermunt, J.D. (1995). ‘Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies’, European Journal of Psychology of Education 10, 325-349.
Vermunt, J.D.H.M. and van Rijswijk, F.A.W.M. (1988). ‘Analysis and development of students' skill in selfregulated learning’, Higher Education 17, 647-682.
Von Prümmer, C. (1994). ‘Women-friendly perspectives in distance education’, Open Learning 9(1), 3-12.
Von Prümmer, C. and Rossié, U. (1988). ‘Gender in distance education at the FernUniversität’, Open Learning 3(2), 3-12.
Watkins, D. (1982). ‘Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students’, Australian Journal of Education 26, 76-85.
Watkins, D. (1983). ‘Assessing tertiary study processes’, Human Learning 2, 29-37.
Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1985). ‘A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students’, Human Learning 4, 127-141.
Weinstein, C.E., Underwood, V.L., Wicker, F.W. and Cubberley, W.E. (1979). ‘Cognitive learning strategies: Verbal and imaginal elaboration’, in O'Neil, H.F., Jr. and Spielberger, C. D. (eds.), Cognitive and Affective Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press, pp. 45-75.
Weinstein, C.E., Zimmermann, S.A. and Palmer, D.R. (1988). ‘Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI’, in Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T. and Alexander, P.A. (eds.), Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 25-40.
Woodley, A. (1984). ‘The older the better? A study of mature student performance in British universities’, Research in Education (32), 35-50.
Woodley, A. and McIntosh, N. (1980). The Door Stood Open: An Evaluation of the Open University Younger Students Pilot Scheme. Barcombe, U.K.: Falmer Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richardson, J.T., Morgan, A. & Woodley, A. Approaches to studying in distance education. Higher Education 37, 23–55 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003445000716
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003445000716