Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of extracellular production and winter photosynthesis to estimates of primary production in a woodland stream community

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both winter photosynthesis and the release of extracellular DOC are commonly ignored in stream production studies. We examined these contributions in a second-order stream under a completely closed deciduous canopy. We estimate that in Sandy Run approximately 26% of the annual autochthonous particulate carbon is produced between December and March. Measured winter rates of photosynthesis were not significantly different than summertime rates. Contrary to implicit assumptions often made about stream primary productivity, winter production was as important as summer production. Highest rates of carbon assimilation, however, were measured in the spring and fall, and were significantly correlated with standing crops of stream algae as measured by chlorophyll concentration. The recovery of released DOC from stream algae indicated that this contribution was equivalent to 5% of the particulate contribution. Rates of DOC production were significantly correlated with rates of particulate production. We estimate that had winter photosynthesis and extracellular DOC production been ignored in Sandy Run, annual productivity would have been underestimated by about a third.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aloi, J. E., 1990. A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 656–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. & K. W. Cummins, 1979. Influences of diet on the life histories of aquatic insects. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, S. B. & M. L. Pace, 1991. The production of dissolved organic matter by phytoplankton and its importance to bacteria: patterns across marine and freshwater systems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 1078–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, D. E. & S. G. Fisher, 1981. Metabolism of a desert stream. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 301–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. J., G. E. Likens & D. L. Strayer, 1982. Photosynthetically produced dissolved organic carbon: An important carbon source for planktonic bacteria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 1080–1090.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W., J. R. Sedell, F. J. Swanson, G. W. Minshall, S. G. Fisher, C. E. Cushing, R. C. Peterson & R. L. Vannote, 1983. Organic matter budgets for stream ecosystems: problems in their evaluation. In: Barnes, J. R. & G. W. Minshall (eds), Stream Ecology: Application and Testing of General Ecological Theory. Plenum Press, NY: 299–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, F. H., 1980. The origin, composition and downstream transport of plant material in a small chalk stream. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G., 1977. Organic matter processing by a stream segment ecosystem: Fort River, Massachusetts, USA. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 62: 701–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G. & G. E. Likens, 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem Metabolism. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. H. & J. R. Webster, 1982. Periphyton production in an Appalachian river. Hydrobiology 97: 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornick, L. E., J. R. Webster & E. F. Benfield, 1981. Periphyton production in an Appalachian Mountain trout stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 106: 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1963. Imported organic matter and secondary productivity in streams. Proc. Int. Cong. Zool. 16: 324–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, S. & M. L. Bothwell, 1986. Photosynthetic characteristics of lotic periphyton. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 43: 1960–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. A. & T. L. Bott, 1982. Diel fluctuations of DOC generated by algae in a piedmont stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 1091–1100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. A. & T. L. Bott, 1985. Acclimation of stream-bed heterotrophic microflora: metabolic responses to dissolved organic matter. Freshwat. Biol. 15: 479–492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keithan, E. D. & R. L. Lowe, 1985. Primary productivity and spatial structure of phytolithic growth in streams in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee. Hydrobiology. 123: 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M. A.& H. B. N. Hynes, 1976. The fate of ‘dissolved’ organic carbon derived from autumn-shed maple leaves (Acer saccharum) in a temperate hard-water stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. S. & G. E. Likens, 1987. The importance of algae in a shaded headwater stream as food for an abundant caddisfly (Trichoptera).J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 6: 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., 1978. Autotrophy in stream ecosystems. Bio-Science 28: 767–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J.& J. R. Sedell, 1980. Relationships between metabolic parameters and stream order in Oregon. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 834–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. S., 1992. Coarse particulate detritus dynamics in small, montane streams of southwestern British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 49: 337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. & J. C. Roff, 1991. Primary production and potential availability of autochthonous carbon in southern Ontario streams. Hydrobiology 224: 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, G. W., F. B. Trama & R. W. Bachman, 1962. Evaluation of a modified C14 technique for shipboard estimation of photosynthesis in large lakes. Great Lakes Research Division Publication No. 8. Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. W., R. V. Schmidt & R. A. Reid, 1972. Acidification and bubbling as an alternative to filtration in determining phytoplankton production by the 14C method. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 29: 1627–1631.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J. D. H. & T. R. Parsons, 1968. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 167. Ottawa.

  • U.S.D.A. 1979. Soil Survey of Crawford County, Pennsylvania. Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.

  • Vollenweider, R. A., 1974. A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. International Biological Program Handbook No. 12. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. R., 1983. The role of benthic macroinvertebrates in detritus dynamics of streams: a computer simulation. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. R. & J. L. Meyer (eds.), 1997. Stream organic matter budgets. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 3–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. R., S. W. Golladay, E. F. Benfield, D. J. D' Angelo & G. T. Peters, 1990. Effects of forest disturbance on particulate organic matter budgets of small streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 120–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ostrofsky, M.L., Weigel, D.E., Hasselback, C.K. et al. The significance of extracellular production and winter photosynthesis to estimates of primary production in a woodland stream community. Hydrobiologia 382, 87–96 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003441206055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003441206055

Navigation