Skip to main content
Log in

Size structure of aquatic communities: Lake Kinneret case

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A size spectra model of Lake Kinneret biota is presented. Mean- annual data on all major groups of aquatic organisms, collected over some 25 years at the Kinneret Limnological Laboratory, were used with corrections reflecting changes observed in 1996. The resulting spectrum is similar to the typical pattern known from previous comparative studies. Comparison of size spectra and quantitative descriptors of complete communities reveals consistent patterns. Highly important are the size spectra extremities, i.e. the smallest and largest organisms. Recent changes in the large organism (fish) part of the spectrum have been documented through application of dual-beam echosounder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergstein, T., Y. Henis & B. Z. Cavary, 1979. Investigations on the photosynthetic sulfur bacterium Chlorobium phaeobacteroides causing seasonal blooms in Lake Kinneret. Can. J. Microbiol. 25: 999–1007.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beurkle, U., 1987. Estimation of fish length from acoustic target strengths. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 44: 1782–1785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, P. R. & L. M. Dickie, 1992. Biomass spectra of aquatic systems in relation to fisheries yield. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 49: 1528–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavary, B. Z. & T. Bergstein, 1984. Fluctuations of bacterial activity in Lake Kinneret sediments. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1161– 1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chislenko, L. L., 1981. Structura fauny i flory v svyazi s razmerami organizmov. Moscow Univ. Press, Moscow, 208 pp. [Structure of fauna and flora as related to the sizes of organisms.] (In Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Degani, G., 1996. The Salamander at the Southern Limit of its Distribution. Laser Pages Publ., Jerusalem, 154 pp.

  • Gaedke, U., 1992. The size distribution of plankton biomass in a large lake and its seasonal variability. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 1202–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gophen, M., 1978a. The Productivity of Mesocyclops leuckarti (claus) in Lake Kinneret (Israel). Hydrobiologia 60: 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gophen, M., 1978b. Zooplankton. In C. Serruya (ed.), Lake Kinneret. Monographiae Biologicae. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague: 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gophen, M. & R. Landau, 1977. Trophic interactions between zooplankton and sardine Mirogrex terraesanctae populations in Lake Kinneret, Israel. Oikos 29: 166–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasz, M. & G. Fournier, 1996. Approximation of the size distribution of marine particles by a sum of log-normal functions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 744–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamenir, Y., 1986. Razmernaya structura ciklicheskih sistem: Vzaimosvyaz parametrov. Ecologiya Morya, 24: 42–51. [Dimensional structure of cyclic systems: Interrelation of parameters.] (In Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenir, Y., 1993. Interdisciplinary investigation of aquatic communities using size spectra. In H. Sterr et al. (eds), Interdisciplinary Discussion of Coastal Research and Coastal Management Issues and Problems: Proc. Intern. Coastal Congress, ICC-Kiel' 92. Lang, Frankfurt-am-Main: 468–476.

  • Kamenir, Y. G. & K. M. Khailov, 1987. Metabolic characteristics and total surface area of the living matter of the ocean: A comparison of size spectra. Oceanology 27: 492–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. R., 1974. Theory of size distribution in ecological communities. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 31: 1859–1862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. R. & L. M. Dickie, 1984. Measuring the Health of Aquatic Ecosystems. In V. W. Cairns et al. (eds), Contaminant Effects on Fisheries. Wiley & Sons, New York: 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, D. N. & E. J. Simmonds, 1992. Fisheries Acoustics. Chapman & Hall, London, 324 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinsky-Rushansky, N., T. Berman & Z. Dubinsky, 1995. Seasonal dynamics of picophytoplankton in Lake Kinneret, Israel. Freshwat. Biol. 34: 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P., 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia, 574 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. H., 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 329 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinghamer, P., 1981. Characteristic size distribution of integral benthic communities. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 38: 1255–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, R. W., A. Prakash & W. H. Sutcliffe, 1972. The size distribution of particles in the ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth, J. M., V. Smetacek & J. Lenz, 1978. Pelagic ecosystem structure: Heterotrophic compartments and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 1256–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G. & M. Munawar, 1986. Plankton size spectra in relation to ecosystem productivity, size, and perturbation. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 43: 1789–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprules, W. G. & A. P. Goyke, 1994. Size-based structure and production in the pelagia of Lakes Ontario and Michigan. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 51: 2603–2611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shteinman, B. & A. Gutman, 1993. Flow dynamics study for the river mouth in a freshwater lake (on example of River Jordan-Lake Kinneret). In S. S. Y. Wang (ed.), Advances in Hydro-Science and Engineering. Univ. Mississippi: 1154–1159.

  • Shteinman, B., E. Mechrez & A. Gutman, 1993. Spatial structure of a jet flow at a river mouth. Boundary-Level Meteorology 62: 379–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shteinman, B., A. Gitelson, Y. Yacobi, A. Parparov, S. Plotnitsky & S. Kaganovsky, 1996a. New approaches to determination of temporal and spatial variation of phytoplankton distribution in aquatic ecosystems. Lake Kinneret case study. In Y. Steinberger (ed.), Preservation of our World in the Wake of Change, 6B. ISEEQS Publ., Jerusalem: 565–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shteinman, B., V. Nikora, M. Ekhnich & A. Sukhodolov, 1996b. An experimental validation of the ‘frozen’ turbulence hypothesis for river flows. In S. Gavrilakis et al. (eds), Advances in Turbulence, 6. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 531–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L., T. Berman, R. Bonner, S. Barry & S. W. Weeks, 1993. Lake Kinneret: A seasonal model for carbon flux through planktonic biota. Limnol. Oceanogr. 38: 1680–1695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traynor, J. J. & J. E. Ehrenberg, 1979. Evaluation of the dual-beam acoustic fish target strength measurement method. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 1065–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky, V. I., 1978. Zhivoye Veshchestvo. Nauka, Moscow, 358 pp. [Living Matter.] (In Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walline, P. D., S. Pisanty, M. Gophen & T. Berman, 1993. The ecosystem of Lake Kinneret, Israel. In V. Christensen & D. Pauly (eds), Trophic Models of Aquatic Systems. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 26: 103–109.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamenir, Y., Walline, P., Shteinman, B. et al. Size structure of aquatic communities: Lake Kinneret case. Hydrobiologia 380, 43–47 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003275717069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003275717069

Navigation