Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Discrimination in the Labour Market: An Efficient Vice?

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the presumption that more information improves economic decision-making, it is often claimed that statistical discrimination reduces inefficiencies. Outlawing discrimination then means foregone efficiency gains. This paper examines whether there is indeed an uncomfortable trade-off between equality and efficiency, by reconsidering some of the most significant statistical-discrimination models. The conclusion is that there is no firm basis for supposing that statistical discrimination is efficient. As well as disputing the efficiency claim, the paper casts further doubts on the common interpretation of the decomposition of empirical wage differentials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aigner, D.J. and G.G. Caine (1977), ‘Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets,’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30, pp. 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1972a), ‘Models of Job Discrimination,’ in: A.H. Pascal (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life, Lexington (Mass.), pp. 83–102.

  • Arrow, K.J. (1972b), ‘Some Mathematical Models of Race in the Labor Larket,’ in: A.H. Pascal (ed.), Racial Discrimination in Economic Life, Lexington (Mass.), pp. 187–203.

  • Arrow, K.J. (1973), ‘Higher Education as a Filter,’ Journal of Public Economics, 2, pp. 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R.D. and J.E. Campion (1982), ‘The Employment Interview: a Summary and Review of Recent Research,’ Personnel Psychology, 35, pp. 1281–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A.S. (1973), ‘Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates,’ Journal of Human Resources, 8, pp. 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R.J. (1982), ‘Estimating Wage Discrimination in the Labor Market,’ Journal of Human Resources, 17, pp. 606–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B.R. (1978), ‘The Effect of Americanization of the Earnings of Foreign-born Men,’ Journal of Political Economy, 86, pp. 897–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. (1988), ‘On the Decomposition of Wage Differentials,’ Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, pp. 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haagsma, R. (1991), ‘Statistical Discrimination and Competitive Signalling,’ Economics Letters, 36, pp. 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haagsma, R. (1993), ‘Is Statistical Discrimination Socially Efficient?,’ Information Economics and Policy, 5, pp. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haagsma, R. (1995), Microeconomic Models of Gender Discrimination in Labour Markets with Asymmetric Information, University of Amsterdam, unpublished dissertation.

  • Kee, P. (1993), The Economic Status of Male Immigrants in the Netherlands, University of Amsterdam, unpublished dissertation.

  • Kossoudji, S.A. (1988), ‘English Language Ability and the Labor Market Opportunities of Hispanic and East Asian Immigrant Men,’ Journal of Labor Economics, 6, pp. 204–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S.J. (1991), ‘The Enforcement of Equal Opportunity Laws under Imperfect Information: Affirmative Action and Alternatives,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S.J. and R. Startz (1983), ‘Private Discrimination and Social Intervention in Competitive Labor Markets,’ American Economic Review, 73, pp. 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcomson, J.M. (1981), ‘Unemployment and the Efficiency Wage Hypothesis,’ Economic Journal, 91, pp. 848–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D. (1988), ‘Employers Discriminatory Behavior and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination,’ Journal of Human Resources, 23, pp. 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R.L. (1973), ‘Male-female Differentials in Urban Labor Markets,’ International Economic Review, 14, pp. 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, R. (1978), Dealing With Discrimination, New York.

  • Phelps, E.S. (1972), ‘The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism,’ American Economic Review, 62, pp. 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S.W. and W.S. Siebert (1993), The Economics of Earnings, Cambridge (UK).

  • Riley, J.G. (1975), ‘Competitive Signalling,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 10, pp. 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J.G. (1979), ‘Informational Equilibrium,’ Econometrica, 47, pp. 331–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and J.E. Stiglitz (1976), ‘Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: an Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, pp. 629–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. and J.E. Stiglitz (1982), ‘A Model of Employment Outcomes Illustrating the Effect of the Structure of Information on the Level and Distribution of Income,’ Economics Letters, 10, pp. 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, S.J. (1986), ‘Is Statistical Discrimination Efficient?,’ American Economic Review, 76, pp. 228–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.M. (1976), ‘Towards a General Equilibrium Theory of Racial Wage Discrimination,’ Southern Economic Journal, 42, pp. 458–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973), ‘Job Market Signaling,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, pp. 355–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1974), ‘Competitive and Optimal Responses to Signals: Analysis of Efficiency and Distribution,’ Journal of Economic Theory, 7, pp. 296–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1975), ‘The Theory of “screening”, Education, and the Distribution of Income,’ American Economic Review, 65, pp. 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haagsma, R. Statistical Discrimination in the Labour Market: An Efficient Vice?. De Economist 146, 321–345 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003253113076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003253113076

Navigation