Skip to main content
Log in

Mating behaviour in Moina brachiata (Jurine, 1820) (Crustacea, Anomopoda)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on mating behaviour in Anomopoda isavailable for very few species only, though matelocation and recognition certainly play an importantrole in maintaining reproductive isolation betweenspecies. Ephippial females and males of Moinabrachiata were observed in a drop of water under amicroscope for 10–20 minutes. Different combinationsof specimens were used, but copulation was onlyobserved when two males and two ephippial females wereplaced together. Males were very active, and oftentried to grasp a female, whereas females usually madeattempts to escape during the entire period of mating.Three phases were recognized: capture, positioning andcopulation. The male captured the female from thedorsal side, then moved to the ventral side and tooka position with its length axis being perpendicular tothat of the female, forming a sort of cross.Thereafter the pair started rotating around the lengthaxis of the female, while the male pushed thepostabdomen into the female‘s brood pouch. Copulationlasted from 16 to 25 seconds. When different kinds offemales were used, males showed preference forephippial females with an empty ephippium and enlargedovaries. Our results indicate that not only visual andtactile cues may be important in identifying speciesidentity and receptivity of the female, but alsochemical signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brauer, F., 1872. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Phyllopoden. Sber. kais. Akad. Wiss., Math.-naturw. Kl., Abt. I, 65: 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. J. & T. W. Snell, 1995. Glycoproteins in daphnids: Potential signals for mating? Arch. Hydrobiol. 134: 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. C. & J. G. Morin, 1990. Patterns of reproduction in ostracodes: a review. J. crust. Biol. 10: 184–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crease, T. J. & P. D. N. Hebert, 1983. A test for the production of sexual pheromones by Daphnia magna(Crustacea: Cladocera). Freshwat. Biol. 13: 491–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S. I. & D.G. Frey, 1991. Cladocera and other Branchiopoda. In Thorp, J. H. & A. P. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York: 723–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatzel, T. & H. K. Schminke, 1996. Mating behaviour of the groundwater copepod Parastenocaris phylluraKiefer, 1938 (Copepoda: Harpacicoida). Contributions to Zoology 66: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordo, T., L. M. Lubián & J. P. Canavate, 1994. Influence of temperature on growth, reproduction and longevity of Moina salina Daday, 1888 (Cladocera, Moinidae). J. Plankton Res. 16: 1513–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E. 1966. Co-occurrence of moinid Cladocera and possible isolating mechanisms. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 16: 1669–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E., 1968. The systematics and evolution of the Moinidae. Trans. am. phil. Soc. N.S. 58: 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravier, C. & P. Mathias, 1930. Sur la reproduction d’un Crustacé Phyllopode du groupe des Conchostracés (Cyzicus cycladoides (Joly)). C.R. acad. Sci. Paris 191: 183–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosvenor, G. H. & G. Smith, 1913. The life-cycle of Moina rectirostris. Quart. J. microsc. Sci. 58: 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurine, L., 1820. Histoire des Monocles, qui se trouvent aux environs de Genève. J. J. Paschoud, Paris, 260 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, P. & S. Dodson, 1993. Chemical communication in planktonic animals. Arch. Hydrobiol. 129: 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. W., B. E. Felgenhauer & L. G. Abele, 1986. Redescription of the clam shrimp Lynceus gracilicornis(Packard) (Branchiopoda, Conchostraca, Lynceidae) from Florida, with notes on its biology. Zool. Scr. 15: 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, P., 1937. Biologie des Crustaces Phyllopodes. Hermann & Cie, Paris, 107 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, O. F., 1785. Entomostraca seu Insecta Testacea, quae in aquis Daniae et Norvegiae reperit, descripsit et iconibus illustravit. Lipsiae et Havniae, 135 pp.

  • Scharfenberg, U., 1911. Studien und Experimente über die Eibildung und den Generationszyklus von Daphnia magna. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 3, Biologisches Supplement, 42 pp.

  • Scourfield, D. J., 1905. Die sogenannten Riechstäbchen bei den Cladoceren. Forschungsber. biol. Stat. Plön 12: 340–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, R. K., 1969. Life cycle of a chydorid cladoceran, Pleuroxus denticulatusBirge. Hydrobiologia 34: 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, N. N., 1971. Chydoridae fauny mira. Fauna SSSR. Nov. Ser. No. 101. Rakoobraznyye. Volume 1. vyp. 2, 531 pp.

  • Snell, T. W. & P. D. Morris, 1993. Sexual communication in copepods and rotifers. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & M. J. Carmona, 1994. Surface glycoproteins in copepods: potential signals for mate recognition. Hydrobiologia 292/293: 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, A., 1880. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Daphnoiden. VI. Samen und Begattung der Daphnoiden. Z. wiss. Zool. 33: 55–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forró, L. Mating behaviour in Moina brachiata (Jurine, 1820) (Crustacea, Anomopoda). Hydrobiologia 360, 153–159 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003105016758

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003105016758

Navigation