Skip to main content
Log in

Metacognition in basic skills instruction

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metacognition is increasingly recognized as important to learning. This article describes self-regulatory processes that promote achievement in the basic skills of reading and mathematical problem solving. Self-regulatory behaviors in reading include clarifying one's purpose, understanding meanings, drawing inferences, looking for relationships, and reformulating text in one's own terms. Self-regulatory behaviors in mathematics include clarifying problem goals, understanding concepts, applying knowledge to reach goals, and monitoring progress toward a solution. The article then describes the author's experiences integrating metacognition with reading and mathematics instruction and highlights students' reactions to learning to think metacognitively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, M. (1989). Student questioning: A case for freshman academic empowerment. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 5(2): 17‐24.

    Google Scholar 

  • APA Division 15 Committee on Learner-centered Teacher Education for the 21st Century (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for the teaching of educational psychology in teacher education programs. NEP/15 Newsletter for Educational Psychologists(1), November, 4‐5, 8.

  • Baker, L. and Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, J.L. Kamil and P. Rosenthal, eds., Handbook of reading research.New York: Longman Press.

  • Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N. and Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. American Psychologist(10): 1078‐1089.

  • Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science: 121‐152.

  • Davey, B. and McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 256‐262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P.A. and Ehrlich, A. (1991). The population explosion.NewYork: Simon and Schuster.

  • Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist(10): 906‐911.

  • Hartman, H.J. (1994). From reciprocal teaching to reciprocal education. Journal of Developmental Education(1): 2‐8, 32.

  • Hartman, H. and Sternberg, R.J. (1993). A broad BACEIS for improving thinking. Instructional Science: 401‐425.

  • Long, J.D. and Long, E.W. (1987). Enhancing student achievement through metacomprehension training. Journal of Developmental Education(1): 2‐5.

  • Palincsar, A.S. and Brown, A.L. (1989). Instruction for self-regulated reading. In L.B. Resnick and L.E. Klopfer, eds., Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Yearbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction (2): 117‐175.

  • Paris, S.G. and Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior3 (1): 5‐22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., Wixson, K.K. and Palincsar, A.S. (1986). Instructional approaches to reading comprehension. Review of Research in Education3: 91‐128.

  • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1989). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In L.B. Resnick and L.E. Klopfer, eds., Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Yearbook.

  • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A.H. Schoenfeld, ed., Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving.New York: Academic Press.

  • Silver, E.A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem solving instruction. In A.H. Schoenfeld, ed., Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E.A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10: 195‐210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, N.A., Simpson, M.L. and Hayes, C.G. (1992). Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students. Journal of Developmental Education6 (1): 2‐10.

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1981). Intelligence as thinking and learning skills. Educational Leadership 39(1): 18‐20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1986). Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills.York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • Wagner, R.K. and Sternberg, R.J. (1984). Alternative conceptions of intelligence and their implications for education. Review of Educational Research(2): 179‐223.

  • Whimbey, A. and Lochhead, J. (1986). Problem solving and comprehension.EHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gourgey, A.F. Metacognition in basic skills instruction. Instructional Science 26, 81–96 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003092414893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003092414893

Keywords

Navigation