Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceivability, intensionality, and the logic of Anselm's modal argument for the existence of God

  • Published:
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anselm (1945–1951). Opera omnia, ad fidem codicum recensuit Franciscus Salesius Schmitt, 6 vols. Edinburgh: Nelson & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselm (1974). Anselm of Canterbury, 4 vols. Trans. Jasper Hopkins and Herbert Richardson. Toronto and New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencivenga, Ermanno (1993). Logic and Other Nonsense: The Case of Anselm and his God. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, Robert (1976). Hartshorne's modal argument for the existence of God, Ratio 17: 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, Robert (1985). Anselm's Argument: The Logic of Divine Existence. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. Morris (1963). Kant's ‘Refutation’ of the ontological argument, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24: 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, Charles (1962). The Logic of Perfection and Other Essays in Neoclassical Metaphysics. LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, Charles (1965). Anselm's Discovery: A Re-Examination of the Ontological Proof God's Existence. LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, Charles (1967). Necessity, Review of Metaphysics 21: 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Desmond Paul (1967). The Logic of Saint Anselm. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, John (1967). A critique of the 'second Argument', in Hick and McGill, pp. 341–356.

  • Hick, John & McGill, Arthur C., eds. (l967). The Many-Faced Argument: Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, Dale (1994). Meinongian logic and Anselm's ontological proof for the existence of God, The Philosophical Forum 25: 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, Dale (1996). Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (1965). Critique of Pure Reason [1787]. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Norman (1960). Anselm's ontological arguments, The Philosophical Review 69: 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.O. (1963). Modal logic and the ontological proof of God's existence, Review of Metaphysics 17: 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin (1961). Avalid ontological argument?, The Philosophical Review 70: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin (1966). Kant's objection to the ontological argument, The Journal of Philosophy 63: 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin (1974). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, Graham (1979). Indefinite descriptions, Logique et Analyse 22: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, Graham (1995). Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purtill, R.L. (1966). Hartshorne's modal proof, The Journal of Philosophy 63: 397–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Stephen (1988). Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schufreider, Gregory (1978). An Introduction to Anselm's Argument. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, Jerome (l962). Existence, predication and the ontological argument, Mind 71: 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA

    Dale Jacquette

Authors
  1. Dale Jacquette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacquette, D. Conceivability, intensionality, and the logic of Anselm's modal argument for the existence of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42, 163–173 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003034726072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003034726072

Keywords

Search

Navigation