Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of cell-lines and regeneration of plants resistant to fusaric acid from Gladiolus × grandiflorus cv. ‘Peter Pears’

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell suspension cultures of ‘Peter Pears’, a cultivar of Gladiolus x grandiflorus (Hort.), susceptible to the fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli (Mass.), have been challenged with fusaric acid, one of the toxins produced by this pathogen. Selected cell-lines showed increased tolerance to the toxin and grew even on concentrations of fusaric acid up to 0.5 mm. When inoculated with a conidial suspension, the mycelial growth on selected cell-lines was limited compared to the control. Fusaric acid greatly reduced plant regeneration, and only two plants were obtained from the callus subcultured for a prolonged time on medium with fusaric acid. These plants have a significantly altered DNA content compared to the control. A reduced callus phase on toxin-containing medium, resulted in an improved regeneration and the DNA content of the regenerated plantlets was similar to the control. Some plants regenerated from these fusaric acid-insensitive cell-lines showed an increased tolerance to the toxin when cultured in vitro in presence of fusaric acid. The selected plants will be further tested for Fusarium-resistance once maturity is reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bulk, R.W. van den, 1991. Application of cell and tissue culture and in vitro selection for disease resistance breeding — a review. Euphytica 56: 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, H.S. & G. Wenzel, 1987. In vitro selection for fusaric acid resistant barley plants. Plant Breeding 99: 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daub, M.E., 1986. Tissue culture and the selection of resistance to pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24: 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. A. & W.R. Sharp, 1986. Applications of somaclonal variation. Biotechnology 4: 528–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gengenbach, B.G. & H.W. Rines, 1986. Use of phytotoxins in selection of disease resistant mutants in tissue culture. Iowa State J Research 60: 449–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschlag, F.A., 1988. Selection of peach cells for insensitivity to culture filtrates of Xanthomonas campestris pv.pruni and regeneration of resistant plants. Theor Appl Genet 76: 865–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, C.L., T.J. McCoy & T.R. Knous, 1984. Selection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cell lines and regeneration of plants resistant to the toxin(s) produced by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. medicaginis. Plant Sci Lett 34: 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H., G.L. Hartman, Y.H. Huang, C.D. Nickel & J.M. Widholm, 1996. Regeneration of soybean plants from embryogenic suspension cultures treated with toxic culture filtrate of Fusarium solani and screening of regenerants for resistance. Phytopatol 86: 714–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.K. & J.M. Jerkins, 1974. Evaluation of resistance in Gladiolus sp. to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli. Phytopathol 65: 481–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, H., 1972. Phytotoxins produced by fusaria. In: R.K.S. Wood, A. Ballio & A. Graniti (Eds.), Phytotoxins in plant disease, pp. 35–48. Academic Press, London New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, B.A.M., R.J. Scheffer & D.M. Elgersma, 1991. Interaction between Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and callus of susceptible and resistant tomato lines: fungal growth and phytoalexin accumulation. J Phytopathol 132: 57–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. & W.R. Scowcroft, 1981. Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60: 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, W.D. & R.L. Pryor, 1957. Susceptibility of Gladiolus varieties to Fusarium, Botrytis and Curvularia. Plant Disease Reporter 41: 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, T.J., R.L. Phillips & H.W. Rines HW, 1982. Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from oat (Avena sativa) tissue cultures: high frequency of partial chromosome loss. Can J Genet Cytol 24: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.D., J.C. Young & H.L. Trenholm, 1983. Fusarium toxins in field corn. I. Time course of fungal growth and production of deoxynivalenol and other mycotoxins. Can J Bot 61: 3080–3087.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J.G. & R.L. Pryor, 1958. Evaluation of 160 varieties of Gladiolus for resistance to fusarium yellows. Plant Disease Reporter 42: 1405–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, R.L., 1971. Relative survival of seven gladiolus cultivars after field exposure to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 96: 367–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remotti, P.C., 1995. Primary and secondary embryogenesis from cell suspension cultures of Gladiolus. Plant Sci 107: 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remotti, P.C. & H.J.M. Löffler, 1995. Callus induction and plant regeneration from Gladiolus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 42: 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remotti, P.C. & H.J.M. Löffler, 1996. The involvement of fusaric acid in the bulb-rot of Gladiolus. J Phytopathol 144: 405–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roebroek, E.J.A. & J.J. Mes, 1992. Physiological races and vegetative compatibility groups within Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli. Netherlands J Plant Pathol 98: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacristan, M.D., 1982. Resistant responses to Phoma lingam of plants regenerated from selected cell and embryogenic cultures of haploid Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 61: 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, L.M., D.B. Saur, R. Burroughs, H.E. Mohr & J.D. Hubbard, 1979. Ergosterol as a measure of fungal growth. Phytopathol 69: 1202–1203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahin, E.A. & R. Spivey, 1986. A single dominant gene for Fusarium wilt resistance in protoplast-derived tomato plants. Theor Appl Genet 73: 164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda, H., H. Hayashi, K. Yamamoto & T. Hirai, 1984a. Selection of resistant tomato calli to fusaric acid. Ann Phytopathol Soc Japan 50: 538–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda, H., N. Tanaka & T. Hirai, 1984b. Effects of the culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici on tomato callus growth and selection of resistant callus cells to the filtrate. Ann Phytopathol Soc Japan 50: 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, G. & B. Foroughi-Wehr, 1993. In vitro selection. In: M.D. Hayward, N.O. Bosemark & I. Romagosa (Eds.), Plant Breeding: Principles and prospects, pp. 353–370. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, G., 1985. Strategies in unconventional breeding for disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 23: 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Remotti, P.C., Löffler, H.J. & van Vloten-Doting, L. Selection of cell-lines and regeneration of plants resistant to fusaric acid from Gladiolus × grandiflorus cv. ‘Peter Pears’. Euphytica 96, 237–245 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003034215722

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003034215722

Navigation