Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and temporal distribution of freshwater sponges in Connecticut lakes based upon analysis of siliceous spicules in dated sediment cores

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of 28 Connecticut water bodies for spicular remainsoffreshwater sponges preserved in lacustrine sediments revealed14species representing 10 genera. Sediments were examined atfivelevels (ca 1991, ca 1970, ca 1934, ca 1890, ca ≤ 1875)todocument changes in species composition, distribution, andabundance. Five species were recorded statewide in all fivegeologic regions: Spongilla lacustris, Heteromeyeniatubisperma, Anheteromeyenia ryderi, Eunapius fragilis, andEphydatia muelleri. Spongilla lacustris was the mostcommonand widely distributed species. Factors that may havecontributedto the observed distribution of the spongillids in Connecticutareregional differences in lake water chemistries, individualspeciestolerances, and differences in extent of dispersal of variousspecies. Most of the more abundant species are widelydistributedwith respect to water quality parameters. Anheteromeyeniaargyrosperma, Duosclera mackayi and Trochospongillapennsylvanica appear to be restricted to waters exhibitingthelower ranges for conductivity, alkalinity and calcium content.Ingeneral, a greater number of spicules was found in bottomsedimentsof the surveyed lakes as compared with the surface sediments.Oftenthis was correlated with increased sediment accumulation ratesinmore recent periods. When this fact is taken into account, itappears that populations of a number of sponge species haveremained relatively constant in many of the lakes over thepastcentury. However, in some lakes exhibiting lower or onlyslightlyhigher sediment accumulation rates at the surface, fewerspiculeswere also found in more recent sediments, suggesting an actualdecline in sponge population sizes. Changes in abundance overthelast 100 years may be related to changes in land use practicesinsurrounding watersheds and the associated changes in waterchemistries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annadale, N., 1911. Freshwater sponges, hydroids, and polyzoa. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Taylor and Francis, London: 27–126, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakus, G. J., 1968. Sedimentation and benthic invertebrates of Fanning Island, Central Pacific. Mar. Geol. 6: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazer, L. J. & P. E. Fell, 1986. Gemmules of Anheteromeyenia ryderiand Heteromeyenia tubisperma(Porifera: Spongillidae) from southern New England undergo diapause. Freshwat. Biol. 16: 479–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., 1985. The Face of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut Bull. 110, Hartford, CT.

  • Bormann, F. H., G. E. Likens & J. S. Eaton, 1969. Biotic regulation of particulate and solution losses from a forest ecosystem. BioScience 19: 600–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canavan, R. W. & P. A. Siver, 1995. Connecticut Lakes. A Study of the Chemical and Physical Properties of Fifty-six Connecticut Lakes. Connecticut College Arboretum, New London, CT: 299 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheatum, E. P. & J. P. Harris, Jr., 1953. Ecological observations upon the fresh-water sponges in Dallas County, Texas. Field Lab. 23: 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornett, R. J., L. Chant & D. Link, 1984. Sedimentation of 210Pb in Laurentian Shield lakes. Wat. Poll. Res. J. Can. 19: 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanto, E. M. & P. E. Fell, 1996. Distribution and ecology of freshwater sponges in Connecticut. Hydrobiologia 341: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshleman, S. K., 1950. A key to Florida’s fresh-water sponges, with descriptive notes. Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci. 12: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, P. E., 1993. Porifera. In Adiyodi, K. G. & R. G. Adiyodi (eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates VI, A, Asexual Propagation and Reproductive Strategies. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, K., P. A. Siver & A. Lott, 1995. Estimating the effects of changing land use patterns on Connecticut lakes. J. envir. Qual. 25: 325–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T. M., 1991. Porifera. In Thorp, J. H. & A. P. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York: 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & T. L. Simpson, 1976. Gemmule polymorphism in the freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris. Arch. Hydrobiol. 78: 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glew, J. R., 1989. A portable extruding device for close interval sectioning of unconsolidated core samples. J. Paleolimnol. 2: 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. V. & S. J. Herrmann, 1980. Paleolimnology of three species of fresh-water sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) from a sediment core of a Colorado semidrainage mountain lake. Trans. am. microsc. Soc. 99: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, F. W., 1971. A taxonomical investigation of the genus CorvomeyeniaWeltner (Spongillidae) with an introduction of Corvomeyenia carolinensissp. nov. Hydrobiologia 38: 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, F. W., 1974. Sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae). In Hart, C. W. & S. Fuller (eds), Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York: 29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, F. W., 1988. Utilization of freshwater sponges in paleolimnological studies. Palaeoecol. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 62: 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, F. W., P. J. Gleason & P. A. Stone, 1979. Paleolimnology of Lake Okeechobee, Florida: an analysis utilizing spicular components of freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae). Not. Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia 454: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, F. W. & B. G. Warner, 1986. Fossil fresh-water sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) from western Canada: an overlooked group of quaternary paleoecological indicators. Trans. am. microsc. Soc. 105: 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C. C., 1943. Some records of sponges, branchiobdellids, and molluscs from the Reelfoot Lake region. J. Tennessee Acad. Sci. 18: 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, M. E., 1935. An ecological study of the fresh-water sponges of Northeastern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 5: 463–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, M. E., 1939. An ecological study of the fresh-water sponges of Wisconsin, II. The influence of calcium. Ecology 20: 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, C. B., 1944. On the spicule-formation of Spongilla lacustris). I. The dependence of the spicule-formation on the content of dissolved and solid silicic acid of the milieu. Kgl. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Meddelelser 19. 1–45.

  • Kratz, T. K., T. M. Frost & J. E. Elias, 1991. Reconstruction of a regional, 12 000-yr silica decline in lakes by means of fossil sponge spicules. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 1244–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G. E., F. H. Bormann, N. M. Johnson, D. W. Fisher & R. S. Pierce, 1970. Effects of forest cutting and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in the Hubbard Brook watershed-ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 40: 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. G., 1953. Louisiana fresh-water sponges, with ecological observations of certain sponges of the New Orleans area. Trans. am. Microsc. Soc. 72: 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidhofer, J. R., 1940. The freshwater sponges ofWisconsin. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 32: 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norvell, W. A., C. R. Frink & D. E. Hill, 1979. Phosphorus in Connecticut lakes predicted by land use. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5426–5429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okland, K. A. & J. Okland, 1989. The amphiatlantic freshwater sponge Anheteromeyenia ryderi, (Porifera: Spongillidae) taxonomic-geographic implications of records from Norway. Hydrobiologia 171: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okland, K. A. & J. Okland, 1996. Freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) of Norway: distribution and ecology. Hydrobiologia 330: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Old, M. C., 1931. A new species of fresh-water sponge. Trans. am. microsc. Soc. 50: 298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Old, M. C., 1932a. Environmental selection of the fresh-water sponges (Spongillidae) of Michigan. Trans. am. microsc. Soc. 51: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Old, M. C., 1932b. Taxonomy and distribution of the fresh-water sponges (Spongillidae) of Michigan. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters 15: 439–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe, J., 1973. Etude quantitative de la regulacion du squelette chex une eponge d’eau douce. Arch. Biol., Bruxelles 84: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, J. T. & A. A. Racek, 1968. Comprehensive revision of a worldwide collection of freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae). US. Nat. Mus. Bull. No. 272.

  • Poirrier, M. A., 1969. Louisiana fresh-water sponges: Taxonomy, ecology and distribution. PhD. Thesis. Louisiana StateUniversity. Univ. Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, Number 70–9083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirrier, M. A., 1977. Systematic and ecological studies of Anheteromeyenia ryderi(Porifera: Spongillidae) in Louisiana. Trans. am. microsc. Soc. 96: 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirrier, M. A. & M. Winter, 1990. Gemmule pneumatic layer development in Louisiana populations of Spongilla lacustris. In Rutzler, K. (ed.), New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C.: 491–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, E., 1887. Contributions toward a synopsis of the American forms of fresh-water sponges with descriptions of those named by other authors and from all parts of the world. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 39: 158–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racek, A. A., 1970. The Porifera. In Hutchinson, G. E. et al. (eds), Ianula: An Account of the History and Development of the Lago di Monterosi, Latium, Italy. Trans. am. phil. Soc. Phila., N.S. 60: 143–149.

  • Reiswig, H. M. & A. Ricciardi, 1993. Resolution of the taxonomic status of the freshwater sponges Eunapius mackayi, Eunapius igloviformis, and Spongilla johanseni(Porifera: Spongillidae). Trans. am. microsc. Soc. 112: 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, A. & H. M. Reiswig, 1993. Freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) of eastern Canada: taxonomy, distribution and ecology. Can. J. Zool. 71: 665–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richelle-Maurer, E., Y. Degoudenne, G. Van de Vyver & L. Dejonghe, 1994a. Some aspects of heavy metal tolerance in freshwater sponges. In van Soest, R. W. M., Th. M. G. van Kempen & J. C. Braekman (eds), Sponges in Time and Space. Balkema, Rotterdam: 351–354.

  • Richelle-Maurer, E., Y. Degoudenne, G. Van de Vyver & L. Dejonghe, 1994b. Some aspects of the ecology of Belgian freshwater sponges. In van Soest, R. W. M., Th. M. G. van Kempen & J. C. Braekman (eds), Sponges in Time and Space. Balkema, Rotterdam: 341–350.

  • Simpson, T. L., 1984. The Cell Biology of Sponges. Springer Verlag, New York, 662 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, T. L. & J. J. Gilbert, 1973. Gemmulation, gemmule hatching, and sexual reproduction in fresh-water sponges. I. The life cycle of Spongilla lacustrisand Tubella pennsylvanica. Trans. microsc. Soc. 92: 422–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siver, P. A. & L. J. Marsicano, 1995. Quantifying historical conductivity and trophic levels using a paleolimnological approach. Report submitted to the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection: 2–54.

  • Smith, D. G., 1991. The sponges: Porifera, Spongillidae. In Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Massachusetts. Department of Zoology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst: 2–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F., 1921. Distribution of the fresh-water sponges of North America. State III. Dept. Registration Educ. Div. Nat. History Survey 14: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurtz, C. B., 1950. Fresh-water sponges of Pennsylvania and adjacent states. Not. Nat. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 228: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Connecticut College, New London, CT, 06320, USA

    Gina M. Paduano & Paul E. Fell

Authors
  1. Gina M. Paduano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul E. Fell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paduano, G.M., Fell, P.E. Spatial and temporal distribution of freshwater sponges in Connecticut lakes based upon analysis of siliceous spicules in dated sediment cores. Hydrobiologia 350, 105–121 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003031730882

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003031730882

Search

Navigation