Abstract
The efficiency of between and within family selection in a full-sib family recurrent selection programme was investigated using data from three cycles of recurrent selection. Correlations between mid-parent values and offspring were high for sugar content and juice purity characters, but low for root weight and sugar yield. This suggests that single root selection within full-sib families is effective in the improvement of sugar content and juice purity, but ineffective for root weight and sugar yield. Root weight and sugar yield will respond better to between full-sib family selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brim, C.A. & J.W. Burton, 1979. Recurrent selection in soybeans: II. Selection for increased percent protein in seeds. Crop Sci 33: 21–28.
Bulmer, M.G., 1971. The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat 105: 201–211.
Burton, J.W. & B.F. Carver, 1993. Selection among S1 families vs. selfed half-sib or full-sib families in autogamous crops. Crop Sci 19: 494–498.
Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 3rd edn. Longman, London.
Goldringer, I. & P. Brabent, 1993. Sélection récurrente chez les autogames pour l'amélioration des variétés lignées pures: une revue bibliographique. II Agronomie 13: 561–577.
Griffing, B., 1956. A generalized treatment of the use of diallel crosses in quantitative inheritance. Heredity 10: 31–50.
Hallauer, A.R., 1981. Selection and breeding methods. In: K.J. Frey (Ed.), Plant Breeding II, pp. 3–55. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Hallauer, A.R., 1985. Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. Crit Rev Plant Sci 3: 1–34.
Hallauer, A.R., W.A. Russell & K.R. Lamkey, 1988. Corn breeding. In: G.F. Sprague & J.W. Dudley (Eds.), Corn and Corn Improvement, 3rd edn., pp. 463–564. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Hecker, R.J. & R.H. Helmerick, 1985. Sugar beet breeding in the United States. In: G.E. Russell (Ed.), Progress in Plant Breeding, Vol. 1, pp. 37–61. Butterworths, London.
Loffler, C.M., R.H. Bush & J.V. Wiersma, 1983. Recurrent selection for grain protein percentage in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci 23: 1097–1101.
Kenworthy, W.J. & C.A. Brim, 1979. Recurrent selection in soybeans: I. Seed yield. Crop Sci 19: 315–318.
Mead, R., 1988. The design of experiments: statistical principles for practical application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Patterson, H.D. & R. Thompson, 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–553.
Patterson, H.D. & E.R. Williams, 1976. A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63: 83–92.
Patterson, H.D., E.R. Williams & E.A. Hunter, 1978. Block designs for variety trials. J Agric Sci (Camb) 90: 395–400.
Payne, R.W., P.W. Lane, P.G.N. Digby, S.A. Harding, P.K. Leech, G.W. Morgan, A.D. Todd, G.T. Wilson, S.J. Welham & R.P. White, 1993. Genstat 5, Release 3, Reference Manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Quinton, M. & C.S. Smith, 1992. Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 70: 1060–1067.
Quinton, M. & C.S. Smith, 1995. Comparison of evaluation — selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 73: 2208–2212.
Robertson, A., 1977. The effect of selection on the estimation of genetic parameters. Z Tierzüchtg Züchtgsbiol 94: 131–135.
Robinson, D.L., R. Thompson & P.N.G. Digby, 1982. REML — a program for the analysis of non-orthogonal data by restricted maximum likelihood. COMPSTAT 82. Short Communications Summmaries of Posters. Physica Verlag, Vienna.
Thompson, R., 1984. The use of multiple copies of data in forming and interpreting analysis of variance. In: K. Hinkelmann (Ed.), Experimental Design, Statistical Model and Genetic Statistics, pp. 155–171. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, B., Mackay, I., Caligari, P. et al. The efficiency of between and within full-sib family selection in a recurrent selection programme in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 95, 355–359 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003026800450
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003026800450