Skip to main content

The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments

Abstract

Direct instruction approaches, as well as the design processes that support them, have been criticized for failing to reflect contemporary research and theory in teaching, learning, and technology. Learning systems are needed that encourage divergent reasoning, problem solving, and critical thinking. Student-centered learning environments have been touted as a means to support such processes. With the emergence of technology, many barriers to implementing innovative alternatives may be overcome. The purposes of this paper are to review and critically analyze research and theory related to technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments and to identify their foundations and assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ackermann, E. (1991). From decontextualized to situated knowledge: Revisiting Piaget's water-level experiment, in I. Harel & S. Papert, eds., Constructionism (pp. 269–294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • APA (1992). Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: Guidelines for School Redesign and Reform (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. & Reder, L.M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing, in L. S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik, eds., Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., Spiro, R. & Anderson, M. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of connected discourse. American Educational Research Journal 15: 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, C. & Hunter, B. (1992). Restructuring, constructivism, and technology: Forging a new relationship. Educational Technology 32(7): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37: 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmont, J. (1989). Cognitive strategies and strategic learning. American Psychologist 37: 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1991). Implications of connectionism for thinking about rules. Educational Researcher 20(3): 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Franks, J., Vye, N. & Sherwood, R. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told, in S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony, eds., Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 470–497). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. (1985). Process versus product: A perspective on tools for communal and informal electronic learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1: 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1): 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1993). Stolen knowledge. Educational Technology 33(3): 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J-I. & Hannafin, M.J. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development 43(2): 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. & Reigeluth, C. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control. Educational Technology 32(10): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1991). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology 31(5): 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(1): 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J.S. & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics, in L.B. Resnick, ed., Knowing, Learning and Instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F.I.M. & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, G. & Mylonas, E. (1988). The Perseus Project: An interactive curriculum on classical Greek civilization. Educational Technology 28(11): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D.J. (1987). Outline of an education semiotic. The American Journal of Semiotics 5(2): 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. & Murphy, D. (1986). Designing systems that train learning ability: From theory to practice. Review of Educational Research 56: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer's view of constructivism. Educational Technology 31(5): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1990). The Systematic Design of Instruction (3rd Ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science 6: 37–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. & White, B. (1982). Learning physics from a dynaturtle. Byte 7: 324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver & Scanlon (1988). Conceptual change in science. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning (5): 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L.D. (1995). The design and analysis of a mathematical microworld. Journal of Educational Computing Research 12(1): 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R., Briggs, L. & Wager, W. (1988). Principles of Instructional Design (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. & Merrill, M.D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development 38: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research 46: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog, in E. Guba, ed., The Paradigm Dialog (pp. 17–27). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, K.M. & Grumelli, M. (1993, February). Focusing Pedagogy on Problem Solving: Modeling Problem-Solving Strategies in an Undergraduate Humanities Course. Presented at the National Conference on Successful College Teaching and Administration, Orlando, FL.

  • Hannafin, M.J. (1989). Interaction strategies and emerging instructional technologies: Psychological perspectives. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 18: 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(1): 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J. (1995). Open-ended learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and implications for automated design, in R. Tennyson, ed., Perspectives on Automating Instructional Design (pp. 101–129). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S.M. & Hill, J.R. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology 34(8): 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., Hooper, S.R., Rieber, L.P. & Kini, A. (1996). Research on and research with emerging technologies, in D. Jonassen, ed., Handbook of Research on Educational Communication and Technology (pp. 378–402). New York: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J. & Land, S. (in press). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education.

  • Hannafin, M.J. & Rieber, L.P. (1989a). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part I. Educational Technology Research and Development 37: 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M.J. & Rieber, L.P. (1989b). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part II. Educational Technology Research and Development 37: 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as a learning environment, in I. Harel & S. Papert, eds., Constructionism (pp. 41–84). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. & Hannafin, M.J. (1991). Psychological perspectives on emerging instructional technologies: A critical analysis. Educational Psychologist 26: 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development 39: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1992). What are cognitive tools? in P. Kommers & H. Mandl, eds., Cognitive Tools for Learning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1996). Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools, in D. Jonassen, ed., Handbook of Research on Educational Communication and Technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. & Inhelder, B. (1975). If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition 3(3): 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. & Murphy, D. (1990). Alternative new directions for instructional design. Educational Technology 30(8): 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R. (1975). Human Memory: Structures and Processes. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1987). The implications of cognitive psychology for computer-based learning tools. Educational Technology 27(11): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, S.M. & Hannafin, M.J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 44(3): 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, S.M. & Hannafin, M.J. (in press). Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study. Educational Technology Research and Development.

  • Language Development and Hypermedia Research Group (1992). Bubble Dialogue: A new tool for instruction and assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(2): 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge.

  • Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivistic values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(3): 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow D. & Johnson, D. (1993). Integrating emerging technologies into fitness education. FAHPERD Journal Fall: 38–42.

  • Levin, J. & Waugh, M. (1987). Educational simulations, tools, games, and microworlds: Computer-based environments for learning. International Journal of Educational Research 12(1): 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Eichinger, D., Anderson, C., Berkheimer, G. & Blakeslee, T. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(3): 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E., Stern, J. & Linn, M. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding. Educational Technology 28(11): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. & Merrill, M. (1990). Transaction shells: A new apprach to courseware authoring. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23(1): 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. & Muilenburg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher 25(5): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionin, G. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos. Educational Technology 33(1): 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist 19: 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research 59: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaslin, M. & Good, T. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational Researcher 21(3): 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today 37: 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., Li, Z. & Jones, M. (1990a). Limitations of first generation instructional design. Educational Technology 30(1): 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., Li, Z. & Jones, M. (1990b). The second generation instructional design research program. Educational Technology 30(3): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1956). Information and memory. Scientific American 8: 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers' Association (1993). NSTA Standards for Science Teacher Preparation: An NSTA Position Statement. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers' Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal 28(1): 117–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. (1988). Schoolworlds/Microworlds: Computers and the Culture of the Classroom. New York: Pergammon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1(2): 117–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993a). The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993b). Mindstorms (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R.D., (1991). Learning through multimedia. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 7: 58–66.

  • Pea, R.D., (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education, in G. Salomon's, ed., Distributed Intelligence (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge.

  • Perkins, D. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology 31(5): 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning, in G. Salomon's, ed., Distributed Intelligence (pp. 89–109). New York: Cambridge.

  • Perkins, D. & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher 18(1): 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review of Educational Research 58: 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher 24(7): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M. (1989). Educational technology at the crossroads: New mindsets and new directions. Educational Technology Research and Development 37(1): 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology 36(5): 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P. (1992). Computer-based microworlds: A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(1): 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal in Research in Science Teaching 30(2): 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of Media, Cognition, and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1986). Information technologies: What you see is not (always) what you get. Educational Psychologist 20: 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Globerson, T. & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions froma reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology 81(4): 620–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher 4: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing, in S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal & R. Glaser, eds., Thinking and Learning Skills: Research and Open Questions (pp. 563–577). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J. & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 5: 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. & Yerushalmy, M. (1987). The Geometric Supposer: Using microcomputers to restore invention to the learning of mathematics, in D. Perkins, J. Lockhead & J. Bishop, eds., Thinking: Proceedings of the Second International Conference (pp. 525–536). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotsberger, P. (1996). Instructional uses of the World Wide Web: Exemplars and precautions. Educational Technology 36(2): 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M. & Coulson, R. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology 5: 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. & Jengh, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility, random access instruction, and hypertext: Theory and technology for non-linear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter, in D. Nix and R. Spiro, eds., Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 3: 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, E. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16: 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strommen, E. & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology, and the future of classroom learning. Education and Urban Society 24: 466–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, B.D., Macy, G. & Pope, J. (1991). The book, the computer, and the humanities. T.H.E. Journal 8: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Dawson, G. (1992). Constraints to curriculum reform: Teachers and the myths of schooling. Educational Technology Research and Development 40(1): 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trollip, S.R. & Lippert, R.C. (1987). Constructing knowledge bases: A promising instructional tool. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 14(2): 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigger, D., Byard, M., Draper, S., Driver, R., Hartley, R., Hennessy, S., Mallen, C., Mohamed, R., O'Malley, C., O'shea, T. & Scanlon, E. (1991). The ‘conceptual change in science’ project. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 7: 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. & Horwitz, P. (1987). ThinkerTools: Enabling Children to Understand Physical Laws. Cambridge, MA: BBN Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1929). The Aims of Education. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education, in I. Harel & S. Papert, eds., Constructionism (pp. 193–203). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership? Educational Technology 3: 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, N., Haan, B., Meyrowitz, N. & Drucker, S. (1988). Intermedia: The concept and the construction of a seamless information environment. Computer 21(1): 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(1): 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. & McNeese, M. (1995). A situated cognition approach to problem solving, in J. Flach, P. Hancock & K. Vicente, eds., The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HANNAFIN, M.J., LAND, S.M. The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science 25, 167–202 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002997414652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002997414652

  • student-centered learning
  • learning environments
  • technology