Skip to main content
Log in

THE THEORY OF APPEARING DEFENDED

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1961): Perception and the Physical World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1962): Sense and Sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A.J. (1956): The Problem of Knowledge. Harmondsworth, England: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, W. (1992): 'Vision and Experience: the Causal Theory and the Disjunctive Conception', Philosophical Quarterly 42, 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.J. (1957): Perceiving. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.J. (1971): 'The Theory of Appearing', in M. Black (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, pp. 97–112. New York: Books for Libraries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1969): Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. (1992): Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1977): 'Perceptual Objects', Synthese 35, 257–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1961): 'The Causal Theory of Perception', in his Studies in the Ways of Words, pp. 224–247. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, C.L. (1988): Color for Philosophers. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, G. (1991): 'Color and the Mind-Body Problem', Review of Metaphysics XLV, 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J.M. (1973): Experiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, J. (1992): 'The Causal Theory of Perception', Philosophical Quarterly 42, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1977): Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986): On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, B. (1990): 'Phenomenal States', in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 4. Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, pp. 81–108. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1982): 'Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge', Proceedings of the British Academy 68, 455–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1986): 'Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space', in P. Petit and J. McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context, pp. 137–168. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1983): The Subjective View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1991): The Problem of Consciousness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.E. (1922): Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974): 'What is it Like to be a Bat?' Philosophical Review LXXXIII, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, G. (1971): A Theory of Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, H.H. (1950): Perception. 2d ed. London: Methuen and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. (1985): 'The General Form of the Argument for Berkeleian Idealism', in J. Foster and H. Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley, pp. 163–186. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. (1990): 'The Objects of Perceptual Experience II', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LXIV, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963): Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, P. (1981): 'Experience, Vision, and Causation', in J. Dancy (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge, pp. 192–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, P. (1990): 'The Objects of Perceptual Experience I', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LXIV, 121–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, P. (1992): 'How to Interpret “Direct Perception”', in T. Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience, pp. 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. (1979): 'Perception and its Objects', in G. McDonald (ed.), Perception and Identity, pp. 41–60. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.A. (1969): 'Perception and the Time-Gap Argument', Philosophical Quarterly 19, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (1982): 'A Causal Analysis of Seeing', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XLII, 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langsam, H. THE THEORY OF APPEARING DEFENDED. Philosophical Studies 87, 33–59 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002994402591

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002994402591

Navigation