Skip to main content
Log in

On the surface of phenomenography: A response to Graham Webb

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Webb's (1997) critique of phenomenography is challenged. The descriptionof phenomenography is unrecognisable and based on an inadequate review of theliterature, while the whole attempt to invalidate this approach to researchis seen as far from disinterested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bereiter, C. (1994). 'Implications of postmodernism for science, science as progressive discourse', Educational Psychologist 29(1): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1987). The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ): Manual. Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1993). 'What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification', British Journal of Educational Psychology 63: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin, B. (1989). — Religionen, själen och livets mening. En fenomenografisk och existens-filosofisk studie av religionsundervisningens villkor. [Religion, the soul, and the meaning of life. A phenomenographic and existential study of the conditions of religious education.] Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonson, R. (1984). Rhetoric in sociology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1993). 'Advancing phenomenography. Questions of method', Nordisk Pedagogik 2/93: 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. (1993). 'Technology, bureaucracy and schooling. Discursive resources and control', Cultural Dynamics 6(1-2): 84–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1989). 'Towards a pedagogy of content', Educational Psychologist 24: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, J. (1983). 'A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method', in Harding S. and Hintikka, M.B. (eds), Discovering Reality. Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. (1994). Human Competence at work, An interpretative approach. Göteborg: BAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1994). 'Minding action: Conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices', Nordisk Peadgogik 2/94: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theman, J. (1983). Uppfattningar av politiskmakt. [Conceptions of political power.] Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uljens, M. (1993). 'The essence and existence of phenomenography', Nordisk Pedagogik 3/93: 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1984). 'Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: the insertion of Piaget into early education', in Changing the Subject. Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C. and Walkerdine, V. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, G. (1997). 'Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography', Higher Education 33: 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. and Pawluch, D. (1985). '}Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations}', Social Problems 32(3): 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekeblad, E. On the surface of phenomenography: A response to Graham Webb. Higher Education 33, 219–224 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002991417611

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002991417611

Keywords

Navigation